Top Medical Journal Retracts E-Cigarette Smoking Cessation Effectiveness Paper

Industry Insight by 2FIRSTS
Apr.15.2024
Top Medical Journal Retracts E-Cigarette Smoking Cessation Effectiveness Paper
JAMA retracts e-cigarette quitting study for major coding errors and doubts on accuracy, causing widespread concern and controversy.

Recently, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) retracted an article published two months ago about vaping e-cigarettes due to researchers notifying the editors of "significant coding errors" and other issues in the study.

Top Medical Journal Retracts E-Cigarette Smoking Cessation Effectiveness Paper
Withdrawal page | Image source: American Medical Association Journal

 

This paper titled "Effectiveness of e-cigarettes compared with varenicline and nicotine gum for smoking cessation: a randomized clinical trial" was originally published in the January 29th issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, led by Dr. Liu Zhaobo from the Smoking Control and Respiratory Disease Prevention Department at Beijing Friendship Hospital. The researchers in this study found that in terms of helping people quit smoking, using e-cigarettes is not inferior to prescription medications and is more effective than nicotine gum. The paper has garnered widespread attention in the medical community, non-professional media, and social media.

 

Top Medical Journal Retracts E-Cigarette Smoking Cessation Effectiveness Paper
Withdrawal notice | Image source: Journal of the American Medical Association

 

However, the article was later retracted.

 

The retraction notice for this paper was issued on March 29th as follows:

 

We have identified significant coding errors that are difficult to correct. We also found discrepancies in the calculations, which have raised doubts about the accuracy and reliability of the reported results. Therefore, we believe it is necessary to retract this article in order to maintain the integrity of scientific research and uphold the trust of our readers and the medical community. All co-authors have agreed to the retraction. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or confusion this may have caused.

 

According to the academic media Research Gate, Liu Zhao later responded to media inquiries via email, stating that the article was voluntarily retracted by the research team. He provided the following explanation in response:

 

As we explained to the editors of the Journal of the American Medical Association, following the publication of this paper, we plan to conduct a secondary analysis. In this process, we discovered that 109 participants who should have been in the NRT group were incorrectly placed in the EC group, and another 109 participants who should have been in the EC group were incorrectly placed in the NRT group. We immediately conducted an analysis and found that the main results had changed, therefore, we promptly wrote a letter to the editor explaining this issue and requesting the retraction of the paper.

 

Furthermore, according to publicly available information, no other articles have been affected by these issues. According to Clarivate's Web of Science, the research findings in question have been cited once.

 

Dr. Liu Chaobo, the first author of the paper by the group called 2FIRSTS, was contacted for details regarding the withdrawal notice. Dr. Liu stated that the withdrawal notice was clearly explained and no further information could be disclosed. Additionally, a call was made to the Tobacco Control and Cessation Center at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital to inquire about the details, but the staff member who answered the call claimed to be unaware of the situation.

 

2FIRSTS will continue to follow the latest developments on the research paper and its retraction.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Kenya’s BAT Kenya resumes Velo nicotine pouches after citing regulatory clarity
Kenya’s BAT Kenya resumes Velo nicotine pouches after citing regulatory clarity
BAT Kenya says it has resumed sales of Velo oral nicotine pouches after receiving regulatory clarity, reinforcing its push into non-combustible products as cigarette consumption falls.The company reported a 10% drop in turnover in 2025, with revenue closing at KSh23.2 billion (about $178.64 million), largely attributed to the growing presence of illegal tobacco products.
Mar.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
JTI Korea Rebrands Ploom Sticks to “EVO,” Launches 8 Variants
JTI Korea Rebrands Ploom Sticks to “EVO,” Launches 8 Variants
JTI Korea said it will rebrand the dedicated stick line for its heated tobacco device Ploom, changing the name from “Mebius for Ploom” to “EVO.”
Mar.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Syria announces comprehensive ban on e-cigarettes covering production, trade, sale and use
Syria announces comprehensive ban on e-cigarettes covering production, trade, sale and use
Syria Damascus health authorities announced a comprehensive ban on e-cigarettes, prohibiting their production, circulation, sale and use, citing health risks and the need to protect public health, particularly among children and young people.
Mar.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Pennsylvania to Publish Vape Manufacturer Directory by June 20
Pennsylvania to Publish Vape Manufacturer Directory by June 20
Now that Act 57 of 2025 is in effect, every manufacturer of nicotine-containing electronic cigarettes sold or offered for retail sale in Pennsylvania must be certified by the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General.
Apr.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York Proposal to Tax Nicotine Pouches at 75% Draws Opposition
New York Proposal to Tax Nicotine Pouches at 75% Draws Opposition
A proposal by New York Governor Kathy Hochul to impose a steep tax on nicotine pouches has drawn opposition from law-enforcement officials and business groups, who say it could expand the state’s illicit tobacco market. The measure was included in Hochul’s preliminary two-year USD 260 billion budget plan and would treat nicotine pouches like other tobacco products.
Mar.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Reynolds Appeals ITC Defeat in Disposable Vape Section 337 Case to U.S. Federal Circuit
Reynolds Appeals ITC Defeat in Disposable Vape Section 337 Case to U.S. Federal Circuit
On March 13, 2026, R.J. Reynolds and related companies filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, seeking review of the U.S. International Trade Commission’s final ruling in the disposable vape Section 337 investigation.
Mar.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai