Understanding Legal Age Limits for Purchasing E-Cigarettes

Aug.31.2022
The age of purchasing and using electronic cigarettes varies between countries, with the US recently changing to 21 years old. Restrictions aim to prevent underage use.

Over the past decade, electronic cigarettes have experienced rapid development, becoming the most popular category of tobacco products and a common solution for those trying to quit smoking. However, with their increasing popularity has come a problematic group of customers – curious minors. Regulatory agencies and legislators have implemented various strategies to prevent young people from using electronic cigarettes, with the most common approach being age restrictions on purchasing these products.

 

Similar to alcohol, mandating a minimum age for the sale of electronic cigarettes is not a perfect solution, but it remains the most reliable method for reducing youth use. Legislators are tasked with determining the age at which individuals can legally purchase e-cigarettes. However, punishing retailers who violate the law and enforcing the regulations can prove challenging. Mistakes in enforcement may inadvertently increase smoking among young people or adults or contribute to the creation of a black market.

 

In most countries, electronic cigarettes are either regulated as tobacco products or as a separate consumer product category, or are not regulated at all. In some countries, electronic cigarette products are prohibited. In countries where they are regulated, the legal age to purchase electronic cigarettes is usually the same as the legal age of majority. In most countries, this age is 18 years old, but as we will see, the situation varies, for example in the US, the largest electronic cigarette market in the world, the legal age to use electronic cigarettes is 21 years old.

 

What is the legal age for purchasing and using e-cigarettes in the United States?

 

In response to pressure from tobacco control groups and concerned parents, Congress passed the new 21st federal tobacco law in December 2019. The law was included in the year-end federal appropriation bill, signed into law by President Trump on December 20th, and went into effect immediately. While it encompasses both cigarettes and other tobacco products, the driving force behind this legislation was concern over youth use of e-cigarettes.

 

The bill adds a provision to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act stating that it is illegal for any retailer to sell tobacco products to anyone under the age of 21. It mandates that each state enforce age restrictions or risk losing some federal drug abuse grant money. The new law does not penalize individuals under the age of 21 for purchasing, using, or possessing tobacco products (usually referred to as "PUP laws"), but only imposes fines on retailers who sell to underage customers.

 

Advocating for the Tobacco Control Act on the 21st.

 

In 2016, the FDA determined that it was federally prohibited to sell electronic cigarette products to those under 18 years of age. By classifying smokeless devices and e-liquids as tobacco products, they automatically fell under existing federal restrictions. The minimum age for purchasing e-cigarettes has been a core demand of tobacco control activists who have long described the e-cigarette market as a "wild west" in need of FDA regulation. The truth is not quite as exciting: at the time federal action was taken, 48 states already had their own age restrictions in place.

 

The legal age for electronic cigarettes varies across countries worldwide.

 

With the exception of countries that have banned electronic cigarettes and those without regulations surrounding them, the majority of nations simply use the legal age of adulthood to set the minimum age for purchasing electronic cigarette products (as well as other adult products).

 

Some countries have a national legal age but allow individual states or provinces to set a higher legal age. For example, Canada's national minimum age is 18, but many provinces and territories have set the age of 19 as the legal age to purchase e-cigarette products. In Australia, the sale of nicotine-containing products (excluding cigarettes) without a doctor's prescription is illegal, but the use of non-nicotine e-cigarettes is allowed and the purchasing age varies by state.

 

If you plan to bring electronic cigarette products to another country, it is wise to contact the authorities of that country before departing to learn about the latest information on electronic cigarette laws and practices.

 

Countries where the legal age for electronic cigarettes is 18 years old:

 

Belgium, Bhutan, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Ecuador, England, El Salvador, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Poland, Portugal, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Slovenia, South Africa, Sweden, Tajikistan, Togo, Tuvalu, Ukraine, Vietnam, Wales.

 

The legal age for purchasing electronic cigarettes is 19 years old in this country.

 

Jordan, South Korea, and Turkey.

 

Countries where the legal age for e-cigarette consumption is 20 years old:

 

Japan

 

Country with legal vaping age of 21 years old:

 

Ethiopia, Guam, Honduras, the Republic of Palau, the Philippines, and the United States (source: the Johns Hopkins University Global Tobacco Control website, Knowledge-Action-Change Global Tobacco Harm Reduction website, and VAPING360 survey)

 

Who knows when adulthood truly begins?

 

No one knows exactly when adolescence ends or adulthood begins - in fact, it varies for each person. However, lawmakers must decide on a legal age of majority that allows young people to vote, sign contracts, apply for credit, serve in the military, and purchase age-restricted products such as alcohol, tobacco, and other items considered inappropriate for children.

 

Age is always a compromise, but it acknowledges that we allow adults to make many risky choices. The U.S. 21 Tobacco Law is a special law because it considers smoking (and vaping) too risky to the point where cigarettes (and e-cigarettes) must be taken away from young people. Most countries in the world have not found enough evidence to support the necessity of taking such extreme measures.

 

Statement.

 

This article is compiled from third-party information and is for industry exchange and learning purposes only.

 

This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and the company is unable to confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is solely intended for industry-related exchange and research purposes.

 

Due to limitations in our translation abilities, this article may not exactly reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.

 

2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or international issues and positions.

 

The compilation of information is the property of the original media and authors. If there is any copyright infringement, please contact us for deletion.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme will take effect on October 1, 2026. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK will face a flat excise duty of £2.20 per 10ml, whether or not they contain nicotine. Newly manufactured or imported products released onto the UK market from October 1 will require a valid duty stamp, while eligible existing unstamped inventory can continue to be sold through March 31, 2027. From April 1, 2027, all vaping products outside duty suspension must carry a valid stamp.
Sep.03
Altria Showcases Ploom, Marlboro Heated Tobacco Sticks and Non-Nicotine Energy Products at NACS Show 2026
Altria Showcases Ploom, Marlboro Heated Tobacco Sticks and Non-Nicotine Energy Products at NACS Show 2026
At the 2026 NACS Show, Altria displayed Ploom devices alongside imagery of Marlboro-branded heated tobacco sticks, while also featuring RIOT Energy and Proper Wild non-nicotine products. The booth showcased on! PLUS nicotine pouches, including 12 mg variants not listed among FDA-authorized products as of October 9, and NJOY e-cigarettes. Altria also presented convenience-store traffic figures highlighting its retail presence. 2Firsts examines the company's expanded product portfolio, non-nicotine business activities and the regulatory status of products displayed at the show.
EXPO
Oct.10
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
HM Revenue & Customs put the UK's Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme into effect on October 1. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK are now subject to duty at £2.20 per 10ml, regardless of nicotine content. The stamp regime will introduce digital functionality designed to provide traceability throughout the supply chain, with approved manufacturers, importers and warehousekeepers required to report product movements and retailers and consumers eventually able to scan stamps to verify authenticity. China exported $177 million of vape-related products to the UK in August, up 51.4% year over year, increasing the significance of the new compliance regime for China's Shenzhen-centered vape supply chain.
Regulations
Oct.04
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22