Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement

Jan.12
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

Key Takeaways

 

• Appellant: the Commonwealth of Virginia (notice filed by the attorney general)

• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

• Statute: Virginia Chapter 23.2 flavored-vape restrictions

• District ruling: state-constitution and equal-protection claims blocked; statute found preempted by FDCA and Tobacco Control Act

• Case: NOVA Distro Inc. et al. v. Miyares et al., No. 3:25-cv-00857, E.D. Va.

 


 

2Firsts, January 12, 2026 – According to Law360, Virginia is asking the Fourth Circuit to overturn a court order that partially blocked the state from enforcing a ban on flavored vapes. The commonwealth notified U.S. District Judge David J. Novak that it seeks to upend his December order finding Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

 

The report says the suit is one of many nationwide seeking to stop state-issued vape bans, and notes the complaint’s framing that the prohibitions help “Big Tobacco,” with allegations that large tobacco companies drove the Virginia law to push out smaller companies.

 

Novak’s order said plaintiffs Nova Distro Inc. and Tobacco Hut and Vape Fairfax Inc. could not proceed with claims that the law violated the Virginia constitution or the Equal Protection Clause. The judge did find the law was ultimately preempted, stating that the FDCA allows states to regulate vape sales in ways “in addition to, or more stringent than,” federal law, but does not allow states to make identical regulations.

 

The case is NOVA Distro Inc. et al. v. Miyares et al., No. 3:25-cv-00857, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

 

Image source: Law360

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Virginia Restricts Vape Sales to Products Listed in State Directory From April 1
Virginia Restricts Vape Sales to Products Listed in State Directory From April 1
From April 1, vape shops in Virginia may sell only liquid nicotine and vapor products listed in the state directory. The Office of the Attorney General has recommended that commonwealth attorneys begin enforcing the 2024 law.
Apr.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
The Ohio Supreme Court has agreed to hear Attorney General Dave Yost’s appeal seeking to revive lawsuits against three Ohio vape retailers. Lower courts dismissed the cases, finding that federal law governs whether vaping products may be marketed and sold.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ireland’s 2026 amendment bill to regulate nicotine pouches and tighten rules on vaping products
Ireland’s 2026 amendment bill to regulate nicotine pouches and tighten rules on vaping products
The Irish government has approved the publication of the Public Health (Tobacco Products and Nicotine Inhaling Products) (Amendment) Bill 2026. The bill would ban the sale of nicotine consumption products such as nicotine pouches to those under 18 and further regulate nicotine vaping products.
Mar.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thai Vape User Numbers Rose More Than 11-Fold in Three Years, Group Says Ban Should Be Reassessed
Thai Vape User Numbers Rose More Than 11-Fold in Three Years, Group Says Ban Should Be Reassessed
A network of e-cigarette users in Thailand has urged the new government to review the country’s vape ban, saying official data show that use has risen sharply despite more than a decade of prohibition.
Mar.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
JT Launches Limited-Edition Ploom AURA “Fuchsia Flare” in Advance Sales Starting March 10
JT Launches Limited-Edition Ploom AURA “Fuchsia Flare” in Advance Sales Starting March 10
Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT) began advance sales on March 10 for the fifth limited-edition color of its heated tobacco device “Ploom AURA,” named “Fuchsia Flare.” The product is available through the CLUB JT online shop and Ploom Shops nationwide at a price of JPY 2,980. From March 17, it will also be sold in limited quantities at convenience stores nationwide and selected tobacco retailers.
Mar.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Report: 43% of 546 Canadian specialty vape shops found non-compliant in federal inspections
Report: 43% of 546 Canadian specialty vape shops found non-compliant in federal inspections
Health Canada’s vaping compliance and enforcement report covering inspections from April 2024 to March 2025 found 43% of 546 specialty vaping businesses were not compliant with the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act and the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act, according to the report cited. Health inspectors seized vaping products at 235 specialty vaping establishments.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai