Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement

Jan.12
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

Key Takeaways

 

• Appellant: the Commonwealth of Virginia (notice filed by the attorney general)

• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

• Statute: Virginia Chapter 23.2 flavored-vape restrictions

• District ruling: state-constitution and equal-protection claims blocked; statute found preempted by FDCA and Tobacco Control Act

• Case: NOVA Distro Inc. et al. v. Miyares et al., No. 3:25-cv-00857, E.D. Va.

 


 

2Firsts, January 12, 2026 – According to Law360, Virginia is asking the Fourth Circuit to overturn a court order that partially blocked the state from enforcing a ban on flavored vapes. The commonwealth notified U.S. District Judge David J. Novak that it seeks to upend his December order finding Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

 

The report says the suit is one of many nationwide seeking to stop state-issued vape bans, and notes the complaint’s framing that the prohibitions help “Big Tobacco,” with allegations that large tobacco companies drove the Virginia law to push out smaller companies.

 

Novak’s order said plaintiffs Nova Distro Inc. and Tobacco Hut and Vape Fairfax Inc. could not proceed with claims that the law violated the Virginia constitution or the Equal Protection Clause. The judge did find the law was ultimately preempted, stating that the FDCA allows states to regulate vape sales in ways “in addition to, or more stringent than,” federal law, but does not allow states to make identical regulations.

 

The case is NOVA Distro Inc. et al. v. Miyares et al., No. 3:25-cv-00857, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

 

Image source: Law360

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Canada: “I Want My Pouches” launches during National Non-Smoking Week to push easier adult access to nicotine pouches
Canada: “I Want My Pouches” launches during National Non-Smoking Week to push easier adult access to nicotine pouches
Canadian consumer advocacy group I Want My Pouches announced its launch during National Non-Smoking Week, calling for straightforward, consistent and practical adult access to nicotine pouches.
Jan.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kazakhstan’s Astana Baikonur District Fines Illegal Smokeless Tobacco Sales Over USD 5,800
Kazakhstan’s Astana Baikonur District Fines Illegal Smokeless Tobacco Sales Over USD 5,800
Authorities in Astana’s Baikonur District have intensified enforcement against illegal smokeless tobacco and related products in 2025. Police conducted 59 inspection raids, identifying 63 cases of illegal sales of smokeless tobacco (nasvay). Total fines imposed reached KZT 3,096,450(approximately USD 5,880). Officials said inspections and preventive outreach will continue.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Guam checks 277 eligible retailers in 2025; eight found selling tobacco or disposable vapes to minors aged 16–20
Guam checks 277 eligible retailers in 2025; eight found selling tobacco or disposable vapes to minors aged 16–20
he Guam Behavioral Health and Wellness Center said that out of 277 eligible tobacco retailers inspected in 2025, eight were found selling tobacco or disposable e-cigarettes or vapes to minors aged 16–20, and one retailer failed to display the required “No Sale Under 21” prohibition sign.
Jan.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
USITC Issues Final Ruling in 337-TA-1392 Investigation, Imposes Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
USITC Issues Final Ruling in 337-TA-1392 Investigation, Imposes Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
USITC issues final ruling on oil vaporizing devices, components violating tariff law, with limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | Claiming a “first multi-beverage vaporizer” with refillable juice/cocktail water chamber, PEAKBAR launches new device in the U.S.
Product | Claiming a “first multi-beverage vaporizer” with refillable juice/cocktail water chamber, PEAKBAR launches new device in the U.S.
PEAKBAR’s new H2O 40K has begun selling through U.S. online retailers including Vape Sourcing. Marketed as the “world’s first multi-beverage vaporizer,” the device is promoted as allowing users to add liquids such as juice and cocktails into a water chamber for pairing. Publicly listed specifications include 20 ml of e-liquid, a rated 40,000 puffs, 0.5% nicotine, a 1,000 mAh rechargeable battery, and two power modes at 22W and 12W.
Jan.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Singapore to Extend Etomidate Controls and Table New Vape Legislation in 2026
Singapore to Extend Etomidate Controls and Table New Vape Legislation in 2026
Singapore will maintain etomidate’s classification under drug control laws while preparing new legislation targeting e-vaporisers, as authorities reinforce a hardline regulatory stance on vaping.
Feb.05