Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement

Jan.12
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

Key Takeaways

 

• Appellant: the Commonwealth of Virginia (notice filed by the attorney general)

• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

• Statute: Virginia Chapter 23.2 flavored-vape restrictions

• District ruling: state-constitution and equal-protection claims blocked; statute found preempted by FDCA and Tobacco Control Act

• Case: NOVA Distro Inc. et al. v. Miyares et al., No. 3:25-cv-00857, E.D. Va.

 


 

2Firsts, January 12, 2026 – According to Law360, Virginia is asking the Fourth Circuit to overturn a court order that partially blocked the state from enforcing a ban on flavored vapes. The commonwealth notified U.S. District Judge David J. Novak that it seeks to upend his December order finding Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

 

The report says the suit is one of many nationwide seeking to stop state-issued vape bans, and notes the complaint’s framing that the prohibitions help “Big Tobacco,” with allegations that large tobacco companies drove the Virginia law to push out smaller companies.

 

Novak’s order said plaintiffs Nova Distro Inc. and Tobacco Hut and Vape Fairfax Inc. could not proceed with claims that the law violated the Virginia constitution or the Equal Protection Clause. The judge did find the law was ultimately preempted, stating that the FDCA allows states to regulate vape sales in ways “in addition to, or more stringent than,” federal law, but does not allow states to make identical regulations.

 

The case is NOVA Distro Inc. et al. v. Miyares et al., No. 3:25-cv-00857, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

 

Image source: Law360

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

China’s E-Cigarette Exports Fall Slightly to USD 10.6 Billion in 2025, U.S. Market Further Consolidates Lead
China’s E-Cigarette Exports Fall Slightly to USD 10.6 Billion in 2025, U.S. Market Further Consolidates Lead
China’s e-cigarette exports totaled approximately USD 10.60 billion in 2025, down 3.3% year-on-year from USD 10.96 billion in 2024, according to annual trade data released by the General Administration of Customs of China. Despite the mild decline, exports remained firmly above the USD 10 billion mark, with a clear rebound in the fourth quarter.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT CEO: to ramp up ‘next-generation’ tobacco capacity in Italy, plans €500 mln investment in Trieste plant by 2027
BAT CEO: to ramp up ‘next-generation’ tobacco capacity in Italy, plans €500 mln investment in Trieste plant by 2027
British American Tobacco (BAT) CEO Tadeu Marroco said the group will continue to invest in equipment and technology in Italy and expand capacity for next-generation tobacco products such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco. BAT’s Trieste innovation hub is slated to receive a total investment of 500 million euros by 2027 and add 16 new production lines.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysian Sabah GOF seizes e-cigarettes, vapes and e-liquids worth over  USD 156,333 in seven-district operation
Malaysian Sabah GOF seizes e-cigarettes, vapes and e-liquids worth over USD 156,333 in seven-district operation
In Sabah, Malaysia’s General Operations Force (GOF) seized thousands of e-cigarette devices, vapes and e-liquids worth more than RM635,000 and detained 23 people during a simultaneous integrated operation across seven districts.
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMTA Roundtable Opens with Industry Questioning Product Characterization Standards, FDA Defends Regulatory Boundaries
PMTA Roundtable Opens with Industry Questioning Product Characterization Standards, FDA Defends Regulatory Boundaries
At the opening of FDA’s PMTA roundtable, small ENDS manufacturers warned that unclear product characterization standards are limiting their ability to invest and raise capital. FDA officials acknowledged industry concerns but said regulatory flexibility is constrained by statutory and procedural boundaries.
Feb.11
Product | “Prefilled + Refill” Combo, Up to 30,000 Puffs Claimed: DOJO BLAST 30K PRO Launches in the UK and France
Product | “Prefilled + Refill” Combo, Up to 30,000 Puffs Claimed: DOJO BLAST 30K PRO Launches in the UK and France
DOJO has launched the upgraded BLAST 30K PRO on its official website. The device features a (2+8) ml ×2 “2 ml prefilled pod + 8 ml refill” configuration, delivering 20 ml of e-liquid per kit and claiming up to 30,000 puffs. It is also labeled as fully compatible with BLAST 10K Pods.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Report: 43% of 546 Canadian specialty vape shops found non-compliant in federal inspections
Report: 43% of 546 Canadian specialty vape shops found non-compliant in federal inspections
Health Canada’s vaping compliance and enforcement report covering inspections from April 2024 to March 2025 found 43% of 546 specialty vaping businesses were not compliant with the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act and the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act, according to the report cited. Health inspectors seized vaping products at 235 specialty vaping establishments.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai