WHO Urges Equal Treatment and Ban on Flavored E-cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.14.2023
WHO Urges Equal Treatment and Ban on Flavored E-cigarettes
World Health Organization (WHO) urges governments to treat e-cigarettes like traditional tobacco, threatening tobacco companies' investment in tobacco alternatives.

According to a report by Reuters in London, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a document on December 14 urging governments worldwide to treat e-cigarettes on par with traditional tobacco and ban all flavors, which could potentially jeopardize tobacco companies' investments in tobacco alternatives.

 

Some researchers, advocates, and governments view e-cigarettes as a crucial tool in reducing deaths and diseases caused by tobacco. However, United Nations agencies state that "urgent action" is needed to control them.

 

The World Health Organization cites some studies stating that there is insufficient evidence to confirm e-cigarettes' effectiveness in helping smokers quit and that they are harmful to one's health, potentially leading to nicotine addiction, especially among non-smokers, particularly children and adolescents.

 

In global regions influenced by the World Health Organization, the number of 13-15 year old teenagers using e-cigarettes has surpassed that of adults. The WHO's press release cites strong marketing tactics as a driving force behind the popularity of e-cigarettes.

 

According to the World Health Organization, "children and adolescents are lured and enslaved by e-cigarette at an early age, which could lead to nicotine addiction.

 

The Director-General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has called on countries to implement stringent measures.

 

The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for changes that include banning all additives, such as menthol, in addition to implementing tobacco control measures on e-cigarettes, such as high taxes and restrictions on their use in public places. However, it is important to note that the WHO does not have authoritative power over national regulations and can only provide guidelines. These recommendations are usually voluntarily adopted and implemented.

 

The World Health Organization and several other anti-tobacco organizations are advocating for stricter regulations on new nicotine products, aiming to undermine the future strategies of tobacco giants like Philip Morris International (PMI) and British American Tobacco.

 

Major tobacco companies are seeking to establish new sources of revenue by embracing tobacco alternatives in order to counter the declining smoking rates and stringent regulations faced by certain markets.

 

The tobacco industry claims that e-cigarettes pose significantly fewer health risks than traditional tobacco and can help reduce the harms associated with smoking. They argue that certain flavors and lower prices are crucial in encouraging smokers to switch to e-cigarettes, a viewpoint that is also shared by some tobacco control advocates.

 

The World Health Organization has reported that e-cigarettes produce certain substances, some of which are known to be carcinogenic and pose risks to heart and lung health. The report cites studies indicating that they also harm the brain development of young individuals.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Reuters/AP: China Cancels E-cigarette Export Tax Rebate, Manufacturing Industry Faces Cost and Risk Pressures
Reuters/AP: China Cancels E-cigarette Export Tax Rebate, Manufacturing Industry Faces Cost and Risk Pressures
China officially cancels e-cigarette export tax rebate, putting manufacturing under cost and risk pressure.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report|Russia scales back anti-vaping drive, limits ban to single-region trial
Special Report|Russia scales back anti-vaping drive, limits ban to single-region trial
After months of debate, Russian lawmakers have retreated from plans for a nationwide vaping ban, opting instead for a single-region pilot. The shift reflects pressure from business groups and fiscal authorities, amid warnings that sweeping prohibitions could fuel illegal trade while undermining efforts to regulate the market.
Jan.22
Russia proposes extending voluntary labeling pilot for reusable e-cigarettes to Aug. 31, 2026
Russia proposes extending voluntary labeling pilot for reusable e-cigarettes to Aug. 31, 2026
Russia’s Ministry of Industry and Trade has proposed extending a voluntary labeling pilot covering reusable e-cigarettes and similar personal electric vaporizing devices until August 31, 2026. A draft government decree has been published on the unified portal for posting drafts of normative legal acts.
Jan.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nebraska Lawmakers Consider Major Tax Hikes on Cigarettes, Vapes and Other Nicotine Products
Nebraska Lawmakers Consider Major Tax Hikes on Cigarettes, Vapes and Other Nicotine Products
Nebraska lawmakers are considering two tax bills targeting nicotine products. LB1124 would raise the cigarette tax from $0.64 to $1.64 per pack, while LB1238 would shift cigarettes to a 30% tax on the retailer’s purchase price and increase taxes on alternative nicotine and other tobacco products to 30%. The commentary argues the hikes could raise consumer costs, pressure small retailers, and increase cross-border shopping and illicit market activity.
Feb.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
France drops a vaping clause from the 2026 finance bill after use of Article 49.3
France drops a vaping clause from the 2026 finance bill after use of Article 49.3
A provision in France’s 2026 finance bill intended to regulate vaping products was abandoned after Sébastien Lecornu used Article 49.3 on January 20 to commit the government’s responsibility on the “revenue” section of the state budget.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products have received Marketing Granted Orders (MGO) through the PMTA pathway. The authorizations were completed under the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot program in “record time,” with the FDA citing lower levels of harmful constituents while stressing that the decision applies only to the specified products and does not mean they are safe or FDA approved.
Regulations
Dec.20