YouGov and ASH Youth Survey 2022 on E-cigarette Use among UK Children.

Jul.13.2022
YouGov and ASH Youth Survey 2022 on E-cigarette Use among UK Children.
E-cigarette use among UK children aged 11-17 has risen from 4% in 2020 to 7% in 2022, according to ASH's annual youth survey. Disposable e-cigarettes are now the most commonly used, with Elf Bar and Geek Bar brands being most popular. ASH has called for closer monitoring of the worrying e-cigarette trend, but noted that 92% of under-18s do not smoke or vape. The survey also found that fruit flavours remain the most popular, and that Tik Tok was the most commonly cited online promoter of e-cigare

According to the annual Youth Survey on Smoking and Health (ASH), conducted by YouGov in March and released on July 7th, the current rate of electronic cigarette use among children aged 11 to 17 in the UK has risen from 4% in 2020 to 7% in 2022. The proportion of children who admit to having tried an electronic cigarette has also increased from 14% in 2020 to 16% in 2022.


The disposable e-cigarette is now the most commonly used product in the e-cigarette industry. According to data, its usage has increased by more than seven times from 7% in 2020 and 8% in 2021, to reach 52% in 2022. Elf Bar and Geek Bar are the most popular brands, with the majority of users only having tried these two brands. Only 30% of users have experimented with any other brands.


Over the past year, concerns have grown about the increasing popularity of disposable e-cigarettes among young people, but this is the first time national data has shown the scale of the change. According to ASH, the survey results indicate a worrying increase in e-cigarette use that requires close monitoring. However, the organization points out that 92% of those under 18 who have never smoked have also never vaped – only 2% have used e-cigarettes more than once or twice.


The most common reason non-smokers use e-cigarettes is still "just to try it out" (65%). For young smokers, the most common reasons for using e-cigarettes is "because I like the taste" (21%), followed by "I like the experience" (18%), and then "just to try it out" (15%), but they also said, "because I'm trying to quit smoking" (11%) or "e-cigarettes aren't smoking" (9%). Fruit flavors remain the most popular (57%).


The use of e-cigarettes is closely linked to age. Of those aged between 11 and 15, 10% have tried e-cigarettes, while the figures rise to 29% for 16 and 17-year-olds (the current figures for e-cigarette use among 16 and 17-year-olds are 4% and 14% respectively). Although there has been an increase in the use of e-cigarettes by minors, the underage smoking rate is lower than it was in 2020 (14% in 2022 compared to 16% in 2020).


This year, a survey for the first time included questions about awareness of e-cigarette promotion. Among those aged 11 to 17, over half (56%) reported knowing about e-cigarette promotion, with the most common sources being in-store or online. Former e-cigarette users had the highest awareness rate (72%). Tik Tok was the most commonly cited source of online promotion (45%), followed by Instagram (31%).


In response to the investigation's findings, the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) has called for a series of strict measures to combat retailers who sell e-cigarettes to young people without regard for their safety.


John Dunne, the chief executive of UKVIA, stated in a press release that the organization understands the need to strike a balance between supporting adult smokers to quit smoking while not encouraging those under 18 or who have never smoked to start.


The UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) has sent a letter to the Department of Health and Social Care proposing measures to crack down on the sale of e-cigarettes to minors whilst also maintaining their crucial role in helping smokers quit. The recommendations suggest fines of £10,000 (USD 11,897) and the introduction of a national retail licence scheme.


I'm sorry, I cannot complete this task as there is no original text or information provided for me to translate.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine are already appearing in e-cigarettes and oral pouches, even as key human evidence remains limited. A new Nixodine-S study adds nonclinical data showing differences from nicotine in cytotoxicity and receptor activity, while independent studies point to a more complex toxicological picture. With supply-chain activity growing and FDA seeking clearer authority over nicotine analogues, the industry now faces a larger question: what evidence is needed before these substances can credibly replace nicotine?
SCIENCE
Sep.23
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia's federal government introduced a new illicit tobacco enforcement bill on September 10 that would strengthen evidentiary presumptions, representative sampling, seizure and forfeiture procedures, proceeds-of-crime powers and obligations for customs and logistics operators. The proposal follows the Combatting Illicit Tobacco Act 2026, which took effect in August and increased penalties while expanding investigative and asset-recovery tools. Together, the reforms extend Australia's crackdown from tougher criminal sanctions into import, logistics and evidentiary enforcement.
Sep.14
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
PMI Global R&D Chief Meets Chinese Tobacco Regulator as China Advances Heated Cigarette Standards
PMI Global R&D Chief Meets Chinese Tobacco Regulator as China Advances Heated Cigarette Standards
Philip Morris International’s global R&D chief Michele Cattoni met Liu Sanjiang, deputy director of China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, in Beijing on Aug. 27. The meeting comes as China advances mandatory standards for heated cigarettes and nicotine pouches, laying groundwork for their domestic introduction. Cattoni has held senior roles in PMI’s heated tobacco development, while China’s draft standard covers multiple heating architectures, including systems similar in principle to PMI’s IQOS ILUMA technology.
Aug.27