Aspire Submits Registration Statement for US IPO

Feb.22.2023
Aspire Submits Registration Statement for US IPO
Aspire, an e-cigarette and CBD product company, submitted registration to list on NASDAQ with an expected $155.25 million in funding.

On February 20th, the electronic cigarette and CBD product company, Aspire, filed a registration statement to go public on the US stock market.


The company intends to go public on the NASDAQ stock exchange, with a proposed maximum share price of $9 and the aim of raising $155.25 million by issuing 17.25 million shares. The registration statement provides details on the company's current operations, risk factors, and equity structure.


The parent company of Aspire, a business department, is a manufacturer of vape and CBD products. The total global retail sales of vape products from 2015 to 2020 and the retail sales forecast for 2021 to 2024 are also presented in the registration document (see chart below).


Source: US Securities and Exchange Commission


According to data, during the early days of the company's establishment (2015-17), an open system was more welcomed by the market. However, since the gradual replacement of open vaping systems with closed ones, closed systems have become the mainstream in the market and surpassed open systems in 2019. That year, the global sales of closed vaping systems reached $9.688 billion, surpassing open systems' $8.392 billion.


The company predicts that closed systems will continue to dominate the market and that global vape sales will reach $66.8 billion by 2023.


Since 2019, the company has been expanding its CBD market in the United States and Canada. In 2020, the global sales of cannabis products reached $2.9 billion.


Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


In addition, the company also undertakes OEM/ODM business for electronic atomization systems.


According to Aspire's registration document, the company's main market is Europe, with the European market accounting for 61% of the company's total performance in 2020, followed by 22.6% in the United States. Their efforts to expand in the Asia-Pacific market have been significant, increasing from 0.1% in 2019 to 9.5%.


Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


The risk factors listed in the registration statement of the company are as follows:


Existing and newly enacted laws, regulations, and policies could present barriers to the company's future business operations and have significant adverse effects. Currently, the company can only legally sell one product, Nautilus Prime, in the US, which accounted for less than 11% of the company's US revenues in the year ending June 30, 2020. As a result, the company can no longer sell products that accounted for more than 89% of their US revenues in that same period, leading to a decline in US sales in the six months ending December 31, 2020. The market for cannabis vaporization products is still immature, with most sales occurring in the US, and expansion in the US or globally is not guaranteed. Recently, joint statements from the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, proposed rule changes from NASDAQ, and a bill passed by the US Senate have all called for stricter standards when evaluating the qualifications of auditors for emerging market companies, especially those auditors that are not subject to PCAOB inspections outside of the US. These developments could increase uncertainty around the company's issuances. If there is evidence to suggest or research to show that the use of electronic vaporization or cannabis products poses long-term health risks, the use of such products could significantly decrease, which would have a substantial adverse impact on the company's business, financial condition, and operating performance. The company's operations entail inherent risks and uncertainties, including developments in regulatory environments, medical discoveries, and the market's acceptance of electronic cigarette devices. The company faces potential adverse effects due to sales, product liability, and user complaints. Misuse or abuse of the company's products could lead to potential adverse health effects, leading to complaints, product liability claims, and negative publicity. The company faces competition in the electronic vaporization industry, including larger, more well-known companies with a significantly larger market share, and Aspire may not effectively compete. In addition, widespread outbreaks of diseases, natural disasters, or improper behavior by employees or distributors could harm the company's interests and reputation and have an adverse impact on its business operations.


2FIRSTS will continue to follow this topic and provide timely updates. Stay tuned for our latest coverage.


Reference:


Aspire has filed a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

UK Vape Duty Starts in October as Hayati, DOJO and Others Launch Lower-Capacity Products With Lower Per-Unit Tax
UK Vape Duty Starts in October as Hayati, DOJO and Others Launch Lower-Capacity Products With Lower Per-Unit Tax
The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Ahead of implementation, DOJO, PIXL and Hayati have introduced or been reported to be adding lower-capacity tiers alongside larger products. DOJO has added a 6ml BLAST7K Fresh below its 10ml BLAST10K Fresh, PIXL offers both a 12ml 8000 and a 6ml 5K, while retailer Ninja Vapes says Hayati is preparing a 7ml 4K alongside its existing 12ml 6K. The pattern points to a growing lower-capacity tier in the UK market, although the brands have not all explicitly linked the changes to the new duty.
Sep.23
2Firsts On-Site | CTIHK Showcases Nicotine Pouches, Heated Tobacco and Chinese Cigars at InterTabac 2026
2Firsts On-Site | CTIHK Showcases Nicotine Pouches, Heated Tobacco and Chinese Cigars at InterTabac 2026
At InterTabac 2026 in Dortmund, China Tobacco International (HK) Company Limited (CTIHK) is exhibiting across two separate booths in Hall 5 and Hall 4. Products observed by 2Firsts include heated tobacco products, nicotine pouches, Chinese cigars and tobacco leaf. Nicotine pouch products on display include TOOP, Shuangxi and Ashima.
Market
Sep.16
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Ispire Q4 Revenue Rebounds 33% but Full-Year Sales Still Fall 25% as FY2027 Focus Shifts to Malaysia Manufacturing, ODM, Nicotine Pouches and Age Verification
Ispire Q4 Revenue Rebounds 33% but Full-Year Sales Still Fall 25% as FY2027 Focus Shifts to Malaysia Manufacturing, ODM, Nicotine Pouches and Age Verification
Ispire Technology reported FY2026 revenue of about $96 million, down 24.7% year over year, as U.S. cannabis-vapor hardware and European e-cigarette sales declined by $17.4 million and $12.7 million, respectively. Fourth-quarter revenue rose 32.5% to $26.7 million, while quarterly gross margin fell to 6.3%. For FY2027, the company is prioritizing Malaysia manufacturing and vapor ODM while continuing to develop nicotine pouches, IKE Tech age-verification technology and G-Mesh licensing. Ispire has not separately disclosed the revenue or profit contribution of those newer businesses.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Canada Considers Easing Pharmacy-Only Nicotine Pouch Sales Rules, Potentially Reopening Convenience Store Channel
Canada Considers Easing Pharmacy-Only Nicotine Pouch Sales Rules, Potentially Reopening Convenience Store Channel
Canada's federal government is considering changes to current restrictions on where nicotine pouches can be sold, potentially allowing authorized products to return to convenience stores and other general retail channels, although no decision has been made. Since 2024, emerging nicotine replacement therapy products such as nicotine pouches have been largely restricted to behind-the-counter pharmacy sales. Health Canada, meanwhile, continues to recall unauthorized and higher-strength nicotine pouches, indicating that the current discussion concerns retail access for authorized products rather than a broad relaxation of nicotine pouch regulation.
Sep.14
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14