Australia Government to Crack Down on Illegal Tobacco and E-cigarette Sales

Sep.30.2024
Australia Government to Crack Down on Illegal Tobacco and E-cigarette Sales
South Australia government to crack down on illegal tobacco and e-cigarette sales, offenders may face over $1 million fines.

According to a report by the Daily Mail on September 30th, the South Australian government is set to crack down on illegal tobacco and e-cigarette sales. Stores found in violation may be ordered to cease operations for several months and could face fines exceeding one million Australian dollars.


The South Australian government is moving forward with legislation to empower Consumer and Business Services Minister Andrea Michaels to shut down shops suspected of selling illegal products. If the legislation passes, the minister's initial order will have a 72-hour duration and can be extended to six months with approval from a local magistrate.


Any store that violates the order may face fines up to a maximum of 1.1 million Australian dollars, while individuals could be fined up to 700,000 Australian dollars. Michaels stated that the government's special task force has already seized illegal tobacco and e-cigarettes worth over one million Australian dollars, but further action is still needed.


This is a good start, but we have seen some of the targeted shops reopen almost immediately, which is unacceptable. We will not allow these criminals to profit from targeting unsuspecting people and endangering the health of our children, using the proceeds to fund other illegal activities.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

California Federal Judge Signals Likely Class Certification in Juul–Altria Antitrust Case
California Federal Judge Signals Likely Class Certification in Juul–Altria Antitrust Case
U.S. District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California indicated on Friday that he will likely certify classes of direct and indirect purchasers accusing e-cigarette makers Juul Labs Inc. and former rival Altria Group Inc. of conspiring to limit product variety and violate antitrust laws.
Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Judge Dismisses Some Claims in Arkansas THC Vape Class Action
Judge Dismisses Some Claims in Arkansas THC Vape Class Action
U.S. District Judge Brian S. Miller has dismissed some claims from a proposed class action alleging that vape products contained THC levels above legal limits, while allowing others to proceed. The court rejected warranty and drug liability claims but upheld RICO, negligence, and fraud allegations against multiple defendants.
Nov.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Belgium Plans to Ban All Vape Flavours Except Tobacco, Backed by Health Council
Belgium Plans to Ban All Vape Flavours Except Tobacco, Backed by Health Council
Belgian Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke has announced plans to ban all e-cigarette flavours except tobacco, following new advice from the Superior Health Council (CSS). The move marks a major policy shift, as the Council now fully supports flavour restrictions to curb youth vaping.
Nov.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thailand to Establish Inter-Agency Committee to Strengthen E-Cigarette Enforcement
Thailand to Establish Inter-Agency Committee to Strengthen E-Cigarette Enforcement
The Thai government will establish an inter-agency committee under the Prime Minister’s Office to address the rapid spread of e-cigarettes among youth. Deputy Prime Minister Sophon Sarum said the fragmented enforcement across multiple laws and agencies has created gaps. The new mechanism will coordinate enforcement, report directly to the Cabinet, and propose legal amendments if current laws are insufficient.
Nov.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMI’s Smoke-Free Playbook: What Jacek Olczak Really Told Wall Street
PMI’s Smoke-Free Playbook: What Jacek Olczak Really Told Wall Street
At the Morgan Stanley Global Consumer & Retail Conference on December 2, 2025, PMI CEO Jacek Olczak delivered a clear message: the company’s smoke-free shift is now its central strategy. From ZYN’s surge in the U.S. to IQOS’s global momentum and a changing regulatory tone, his remarks sounded less like an earnings update and more like a declaration of PMI’s smoke-free future.
PMI
Dec.03
EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia
EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia
The EUIPO has ruled that Imiracle failed to demonstrate actual commercial use of its “Elfbar Crystal” brand in Slovakia, and therefore rejected in full the company’s opposition to Shenzhen SKE Technology’s application to register the “Crystal” trademark. The EUIPO noted that the sales records submitted by Imiracle were limited in scope and that the product packaging was in Ukrainian, which it found insufficient to prove that the products had been placed on the Slovak market.
Dec.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai