Byd Electronic Obtains Production License for E-Cigarettes in China

Aug.05.2022
BYD's subsidiary has obtained an e-cigarette manufacturing license, indicating its legal participation in the industry and potential competition.

In the past two years, with the successive release of new policies on electronic cigarette regulation, enterprises engaged in the production and operation of electronic cigarette products, vaporizers, and nicotine used in electronic cigarettes are required to obtain a production license, leading to some domestic electronic cigarette companies turning into the mainstream, and the electronic cigarette industry is moving towards a healthy and orderly development. Recently, BYD announced that it has obtained a production license, which means that BYD Electronics has officially participated in competition in the field of electronic cigarette OEMs with a legal identity.


BYD Electronics receives production license.


On August 4th, BYD Electronic announced on their official public account that their wholly-owned subsidiary, BYD Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd., has been awarded a production license (for electronic cigarette processing enterprises) by the National Tobacco Monopoly Bureau. This means that BYD Electronic can now legally compete in the field of electronic cigarette processing.


BYD Electronic has announced that the company has completed the patent layout and automated production line for its full range of electronic atomization products. The company has integrated its own capabilities in new materials research and development, precision molds, product design and development, as well as intelligent manufacturing, with the goal of becoming a leader and practitioner in the field of health and harm reduction.


For A-share investors, BYD is best known for its new energy vehicles, to the extent that many people consider it to be just an auto company.


It is understood that BYD Electronic spun off from BYD and mainly engages in contract manufacturing of intelligent phones, masks, and e-cigarettes. As early as 2018, BYD Electronic has been laying out the e-cigarette business, and officially launched its ceramic atomization core (ceramic core) technology brand "BEEMCORE" in 2021.


It is worth mentioning that, on the morning of August 4th, BYD Electronic announced that it had been awarded a license to produce tobacco monopolies, and its stock price rose more than 12% at one point during the day, indicating the capital market's expectation for its electronic cigarette business.


Simaole's dominant market position may be challenged.


Aside from BYD Electronics, on the same day, SMIC announced on its official WeChat account, "SMIC Technology," that three fully-owned subsidiaries under the SMIC Group, Shenzhen McWalters Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen McBrother Technology Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen Weiplus Technology Co., Ltd., have been awarded the Tobacco Monopoly Bureau's production permits for tobacco monopoly enterprises. The issuance of these permits further strengthens SMIC's confidence in its future development, and the overall production and operation of the group will proceed according to the planned schedule.


It is undeniable that Smoore is currently the leading electronic cigarette company in China and even globally, and many institutions have high expectations for its development.


It is reported that in 2021, Smoore's global market share continued to expand to 22.8%, surpassing the total of the second to fifth places, and maintaining its position as the world's largest electronic atomization device manufacturer. However, Smoore's stock price has recently dropped significantly as investors believe that BYD and Luxshare Precision's entry into the industry will divide Smoore's market share and reduce their profitability.


However, industry insiders estimate that BYD's outsourcing capacity will not be too high, mainly because they are new to the industry and approved production capacity is mainly based on past business data. Some insiders have disclosed that the approved quantity for the pod is very low.


According to the "Regulations on the Management of Electronic Cigarettes" and related Q&A issued by the China National Tobacco Authority on March 11, 2022, anyone engaged in the production, wholesale, or retail of electronic cigarettes in China must obtain the relevant tobacco monopoly license. The regulations also specify that there will be a transition period from May 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022.


Starting from June, the government began conducting qualification and production capacity audits, which will continue until early October. This means that the production licenses and production capacity status of e-cigarette companies will be intensively disclosed in August and September. It is understood that both brand owners and factories are required to disclose their approved production capacity status.


Currently, it is a critical moment for license issuance. It is understood that regulatory agencies have established numerous teams to visit companies and conduct different types of inspections based on the industry. For example, for aerosol companies, the focus is on the completeness of licenses, compliance with site regulations, scientific manufacturing processes, quality control requirements, employee training and vocational education, as well as annual production capacity and sales history.


BYD Electronic stated that it will firmly support the national policies related to electronic cigarettes, operate its production in compliance with laws and regulations, and make positive contributions to the healthy and orderly development of the industry.


Simoer stated that in the future, they will continue to adhere to regulatory requirements and promote standardized, orderly development. They will also firmly support related national policies and operate in compliance with the law. Simultaneously, they will use scientific and technological innovation as the driving force for enterprise development, actively promote the long-term, healthy development of the industry, serve global customers and users, and fulfill their corporate responsibilities to contribute positively to society.


This article contains excerpts or reproductions of third-party information and its copyright belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion. Any unit or individual who needs to reprint, please contact the author and do not reprint directly.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Pennsylvania Lists 163 Vape Products Eligible for Sale, Including Vuse and JUUL; Previously Pending Chinese Brands Such as OXBAR Remain Absent, While Unlisted Products Including Geek Bar Face Enforcement From October 19
Pennsylvania Lists 163 Vape Products Eligible for Sale, Including Vuse and JUUL; Previously Pending Chinese Brands Such as OXBAR Remain Absent, While Unlisted Products Including Geek Bar Face Enforcement From October 19
Pennsylvania begins enforcing its electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) directory restrictions on October 19, 2026. The October 18 directory contained 163 product records from seven manufacturers, including Vuse, JUUL, NJOY, Logic and Naked 100. Geek Bar, RAZ and Lost Mary were absent. BAT, Altria, Japan Tobacco and JUUL collectively accounted for 112 records, or 68.7%, while Imperial Brands' blu had no listings. The directory included 15 disposable vape records, 40 bottled e-liquids and 10 products labeled 0mg, but no open-system refillable devices. Twenty-two manufacturer certifications remained under review. Four Logic models corresponding to Smoore's pending records were listed under the brand owner, while LYCO, OXBAR and Boulder/Rock had no approved directory entries.
Regulations
Oct.19
Kumulus Vape2026 H1 Revenue Falls 8.3% but Profit Rises 24% as B2B Weakens and Consumer Channels Grow
Kumulus Vape2026 H1 Revenue Falls 8.3% but Profit Rises 24% as B2B Weakens and Consumer Channels Grow
French vaping company Kumulus Vape reported first-half 2026 revenue of €25.5 million, down 8.3% year over year, as its core B2B distribution business fell 11% to €21.6 million. B2C and store-network revenue rose 5.6% and 17.8%, respectively. Commercial margin increased to 26.3% from 21.7%, while net profit rose 24.1% to €0.8 million. The company attributed the profitability improvement to catalog optimization, logistics restructuring and the ramp-up of Labster, its in-house production unit for proprietary brands.
Market
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Product | KIWI Launches Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro in Germany, Two Hardware Tiers Share Backward-Compatible 2ml Pods
Product | KIWI Launches Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro in Germany, Two Hardware Tiers Share Backward-Compatible 2ml Pods
KIWI has launched the Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro refillable pod systems in Germany at official prices of €18 and €29, respectively. Spark 2 uses an 800mAh removable lithium-ion battery in a pen-style body, while Spark 2 Pro features a 1,400mAh removable battery, a box-shaped design and vibration feedback every 20 puffs. Both devices use the same 2ml Spark V2 pods in 0.8Ω and 1.2Ω versions, with AirSync airflow adjustment and a choice between Cotton Tips and conventional Drip Tips. The new pods also remain compatible with the original KIWI Spark.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Wisconsin Vape Directory One Year On: Retailer Reports Four Store Closures and 70% Staff Cuts
Wisconsin Vape Directory One Year On: Retailer Reports Four Store Closures and 70% Staff Cuts
Wisconsin's electronic vaping device directory has been fully enforced for more than a year, and local vape retailers say the reduced range of eligible products has contributed to declining sales, store closures and layoffs. Johnny Vapes owner Ben Hall said he has closed four of seven locations and cut about 70% of his staff. State law bars the sale of vaping devices not listed on the Wisconsin Department of Revenue directory and allows penalties of $1,000 per day for each unlisted device sold or offered for sale. In April 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit allowed enforcement of the law to continue.
Regulations
Oct.10
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16