Controversy Surrounding American Young People Switching to E-Cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feb.27.2024
Controversy Surrounding American Young People Switching to E-Cigarettes
AHA expresses concern over American youth switching to e-cigarettes, sparking debate among medical experts.

According to a report by The Libertarian Republic, the American Heart Association (AHA) has expressed concern about the trend of young people in the United States switching from tobacco cigarettes to e-cigarettes. However, medical experts argue that there is a contradiction in AHA's statement, as they believe that vaping e-cigarettes is not necessarily a form of tobacco use.

 

The AHA stated in a press release that while the decreasing trend of adolescent smoking is a gratifying victory, the success is overshadowed by the alarming trend of young Americans turning to e-cigarettes and cigars, moving away from traditional cigarettes.

 

Dr. Michael Siegel, a professor in the Department of Community Health Sciences at the School of Public Health at Boston University, noticed contradictions in the statement issued by the American Heart Association. He wrote, "The American Heart Association first expressed pleasure at the decrease in youth smoking rates, but then in the same sentence, expressed dissatisfaction with youth staying away from smoking.

 

Dr. Siegel first corrected the American Heart Association's statement that e-cigarettes are tobacco products. " 'Using e-cigarettes' is not a form of tobacco use. E-liquid does not contain any tobacco, and using e-cigarettes does not involve the heating or burning of tobacco. Therefore, youth using e-cigarettes should not be considered youth using tobacco. 'Using e-cigarettes' is definitely not a form of tobacco use," Dr. Siegel said.

 

He further pointed out: "Even when given the opportunity to clarify their conflicting statements, the American Heart Association chooses to stand by their view that the transition of teenagers from tobacco cigarettes to non-tobacco cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is concerning. Essentially, they are saying that the trend of significantly reducing smoking by keeping kids away from the most toxic consumer product is alarming, because there are teenagers occasionally vaping e-cigarettes (we know, very few kids regularly vape e-cigarettes, much less than those who smoke).

 

Dr. Siegel, who has worked in the field of tobacco control for 25 years, feels saddened by his former colleagues' dogmatic resistance to e-cigarettes.

 

I am troubled and disappointed by the recent trend from the organization I have been working with for many years, which is to urge children to stay away from smoking. What is truly disturbing is that, due to the anti-smoking campaigns, they have come to believe that smoking is no more dangerous than vaping e-cigarettes, causing teenagers to start smoking again.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
An exclusive 2Firsts investigation found an unpublished FDA update on e-cigarette marketing authorizations that mirrors market speculation, suggesting Glas’s application may have cleared internal review, though no official confirmation has been issued.
Regulations
Dec.21
PMTA Roundtable Opens with Industry Questioning Product Characterization Standards, FDA Defends Regulatory Boundaries
PMTA Roundtable Opens with Industry Questioning Product Characterization Standards, FDA Defends Regulatory Boundaries
At the opening of FDA’s PMTA roundtable, small ENDS manufacturers warned that unclear product characterization standards are limiting their ability to invest and raise capital. FDA officials acknowledged industry concerns but said regulatory flexibility is constrained by statutory and procedural boundaries.
Feb.11
PMI reports full-year 2025 results with net revenues of $40.6 billion and smoke-free net revenues were about $16.9 billion
PMI reports full-year 2025 results with net revenues of $40.6 billion and smoke-free net revenues were about $16.9 billion
Philip Morris International (PMI) released its Q4 and full-year 2025 results on February 6, 2026. PMI reported full-year net revenues of $40,648 million ($40.6 billion), reported diluted EPS of $7.26 and adjusted diluted EPS of $7.54. PMI said smoke-free net revenues were $16.9 billion and represented 41.5% of total net revenues, with smoke-free products available in 106 markets and over 43 million estimated adult consumers.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
Law360 reports that a Fifth Circuit panel expressed skepticism about the FDA’s claim that it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarette products, noting that only six applications had been approved out of hundreds of thousands and that near-100% denials look like a ban.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMTA Manufacturing Panel Sees Small Firms Warn “Unknown Is Death” as FDA Defends Review Boundaries
PMTA Manufacturing Panel Sees Small Firms Warn “Unknown Is Death” as FDA Defends Review Boundaries
During FDA’s Feb 10 PMTA roundtable (manufacturing controls panel), small ENDS manufacturers warned that uncertainty in manufacturing expectations creates existential financial risk. FDA officials reiterated review flexibility is constrained by statutory and scientific boundaries. The panel debated testing standards, documentation requirements, open-system responsibility, supply chain changes, and software updates—highlighting unresolved PMTA challenges for small manufacturers.
Feb.11
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
A group of vape distributors and retailers has sued to block enforcement of a Texas law that criminalizes selling or marketing vape products containing e-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in countries designated as “foreign adversaries” by the U.S. Commerce Secretary. The plaintiffs argue the law violates the U.S. Constitution because only Congress may regulate foreign commerce.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai