Proposed Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products in Guam
According to postguam's report on February 5th, legislators listened to extensive testimonies regarding the proposal to ban flavored tobacco products in Guam during Friday's public hearing.
Despite support from health professionals and organizations, some individuals have put forth suggestions for amendments. Meanwhile, the proposal has also faced strong opposition from individuals who use e-cigarette devices, shop owners, and other stakeholders. They advocate for a more targeted approach to enforcement, rather than outright banning sales, including holding adults responsible for supplying e-cigarette products to minors.
The 229-37 Bill, aimed at banning the sale of flavored tobacco products in Guam, is one of several proposed measures targeting the reduction of youth smoking or e-cigarette use. The proposal was initially introduced by Senator Thomas Fisher in early last year, originally known as the 50-37 Bill. Subsequently, the bill was withdrawn and resubmitted as the 229-37 Bill earlier this year, following modifications suggested by the American Cancer Society.
The current legislation clearly defines flavored tobacco products and prohibits the sale of menthol cigarettes and all other flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, without exception. According to Alex Welsh, Senior Regional Media Advocacy Manager at the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, any product that has already obtained market authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will be exempted.
Dr. Annette Davis, Chairperson of the Guam State Epidemiology Outcomes Task Force, has voiced her concern over the "alarming" increase in teenage smoking, particularly the use of e-cigarettes and other smoking devices.
Dr. David states, "Flavored tobacco products are the preferred choice for the majority of our youngest tobacco users, whether they smoke, chew, or use e-cigarettes. A study has found that if e-cigarettes are flavored with mint, candy, or fruit, the likelihood of adolescents experimenting with them increases four to six times. Moreover, novice smokers who prefer mint-flavored tobacco products are more likely to become addicted to nicotine and transition to regular tobacco use later in life.
However, some individuals who oppose the 229 bill argue that e-cigarettes have helped them quit their dependence on traditional cigarettes or tobacco. They further point out that a ban may only lead people to revert back to using other products, ultimately resulting in a loss of tax revenue for the Guam government and economic harm.
Notice
1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.
2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.
Copyright
This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.
This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.