Controversy Surrounding E-Cigarettes as Smoking Cessation Tool

Jan.10.2023
Controversy Surrounding E-Cigarettes as Smoking Cessation Tool
A study claims e-cigarettes do not help smokers quit, but experts criticize its design and potential bias.

In December of last year, the UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS) confirmed the "key role" that e-cigarettes have played in driving smoking rates in the country to their lowest point in history. However, a study published in the Tobacco Control journal shortly after claims that e-cigarettes are not effective tools for quitting smoking. This report has come under criticism from experts and the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA).


This study has sparked a headline in the Daily Mail claiming "study finds e-cigarettes cannot help people quit regular cigarettes." The headline came just seven days after the UK encouraged smokers to switch to e-cigarettes as a means of quitting traditional smoking.


A record-breaking 4 million people in the UK are now using electronic cigarettes, according to the UK National Statistics Office. This widespread shift towards e-cigarettes is believed to be partially responsible for a decrease in the smoking rate in the UK to just 13.3% - the lowest recorded figure to date.


Professor Peter Hajek from Queen Mary University of London states that the conclusion 'e-cigarettes have not made a significant contribution to smoking cessation among the population' cannot be drawn from the available data.


A new study from George Washington University in the United States focuses on "dual users" - people who smoke cigarettes and use electronic cigarettes. The study analyzed data from 2013 to 2019 and concluded that "before 2019, the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) did not contribute to substantial smoking cessation at the population level.


The authors of the study stated that their findings "suggest that reducing smoking can help dual users quit using both products," but critics argue that the study has limitations.


Dr. Sarah Jackson, Head Researcher of the Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group at University College London (UCL), stated that this study did not assess whether or not e-cigarettes help smokers quit smoking.


To determine whether using electronic cigarettes can help people quit smoking, we need to study the difference in smoking cessation rates between users of electronic cigarettes and non-users.


Other studies have already done so, using observational and experimental research designs, and indicate that smokers who attempt to quit smoking using e-cigarettes are more likely to succeed.


The UKVIA believes that vaping can aid smokers in quitting | Source: moffitt.org


Professor John Britton, esteemed epidemiologist at the University of Nottingham, stated, "The design of this study selected individuals who either found it difficult to quit smoking or did not want to quit. In this scenario, the good news is that some individuals were able to achieve success.


This study cannot tell us whether smokers who become dual users are more successful at quitting smoking than smokers who do not become dual users.


Therefore, the message of this paper is that quitting smoking is very difficult, but using electronic cigarettes may help you achieve it. Saying that e-cigarettes can stop you from quitting smoking in the "real world" is incorrect.


Peter Hajek, the director of the Tobacco Dependence Research Unit at Queen Mary University of London, stated that the conclusion that "e-cigarettes make no significant contribution to people quitting smoking" cannot be drawn from the data.


This study focused only on individuals who did not quit smoking and became "dual users" of e-cigarettes, excluding those who quit smoking altogether. Despite the selection of individuals who did not immediately receive full benefits, more than 25% of dual users actually quit smoking.


Excluding those who completely switch to using e-cigarettes and only evaluating their effectiveness on those who become dual users presents a serious methodological problem. It is like picking the best apples from a fertilized orchard, measuring the remaining apples, and declaring that the fertilizer is ineffective.


The tobacco control press release is particularly misleading. It claims that dual use is harmful, but in reality it is associated with reduced smoking and subsequent smoking cessation, making it actually beneficial. It also asserts that the study found e-cigarettes do not help smokers quit more easily, but the paper did not make such a statement.


Professor Robert West, Honorary Professor of Health Psychology at University College London, stated that "this study cannot resolve whether e-cigarettes at a population level help or hinder smoking cessation, but this conclusion may be temporary - so it is surprising to see such a statement from a reputable scientific journal.


A recent study on population trends reveals that individuals attempting to quit smoking are more likely to succeed if they use electronic cigarettes. Moreover, the increasing use of electronic cigarettes in the population is positively correlated with an increase in successful attempts to quit smoking over time.


This confirms strong evidence from randomized trials in which smokers were randomly assigned to receive either electronic cigarettes or products such as nicotine patches, gum, and lozenges. These studies clearly demonstrate that electronic cigarettes are superior.


The press release claims that data suggests the use of e-cigarettes may not be helpful in aiding a sample population to quit smoking, which is particularly surprising given that at the start of the research, individuals who used e-cigarettes daily were more likely to quit smoking in the following two years compared to non-daily users. This is contrary to the direction they seem to be asserting.


John Dunne, the Director General of UKVIA, stated, "No wonder smokers are feeling confused when faced with such mixed messages.


At a recent vaping summit in London, Rosanna O'Connor from the Health Improvement and Differentiation Office advised attendees not to always trust what they read in the media. I fully agree with her statement.


When the same newspaper tells you one day how e-cigarettes can help people quit smoking in the UK, and then contradicts itself the next day, it may seem amusing, but there is a serious point to be made here.


Misinformation about e-cigarettes has prevented smokers from switching to e-cigarettes, which in turn means that lives will continue to be unnecessarily lost due to deadly combustible cigarettes.


When the UK Office for National Statistics expresses enough confidence to say that electronic cigarettes have played a "major role" in reducing smoking rates in the UK, we can be certain that this is true.


If anyone truly doubts whether e-cigarettes can really help people quit smoking, they can ask any of the country's four million e-cigarette users for their thoughts!



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
At InterTabac 2026, nicotine pouch growth was visible not only in brands but across equipment, raw materials and OEM manufacturing. 2Firsts interviewed AIRSCREAM commercial head Steve Moore on how many pouch factories Europe may ultimately need and where manufacturers can differentiate, from formulation and flavour to pouch materials, production consistency and customer service. The category continues to expand, but questions remain over future capacity, consolidation and the long-term structure of the supply chain.
Sep.18
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Bret Koplow said the PMTA pathway is “predicated on tobacco harm reduction.” He outlined four CTP priorities: youth prevention, helping adults quit or switch to lower-risk products, improving relative-risk communication, and reducing unauthorized products. Koplow also addressed flavored e-cigarettes, public risk perceptions, industry credibility and efforts to make PMTA reviews more efficient and predictable.
Sep.26
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Altria Showcases Ploom, Marlboro Heated Tobacco Sticks and Non-Nicotine Energy Products at NACS Show 2026
Altria Showcases Ploom, Marlboro Heated Tobacco Sticks and Non-Nicotine Energy Products at NACS Show 2026
At the 2026 NACS Show, Altria displayed Ploom devices alongside imagery of Marlboro-branded heated tobacco sticks, while also featuring RIOT Energy and Proper Wild non-nicotine products. The booth showcased on! PLUS nicotine pouches, including 12 mg variants not listed among FDA-authorized products as of October 9, and NJOY e-cigarettes. Altria also presented convenience-store traffic figures highlighting its retail presence. 2Firsts examines the company's expanded product portfolio, non-nicotine business activities and the regulatory status of products displayed at the show.
EXPO
Oct.10
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28