Critics Question World Health Organization's Stance on E-cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.10.2024
Critics Question World Health Organization's Stance on E-cigarettes
World Health Organization's statement on e-cigarette-induced seizures sparks controversy on social media, prompting fact-checking and debate.

According to a report by the Daily Mail, the World Health Organization recently made a statement on the social platform "X", claiming that e-cigarettes can cause seizures within a few hours, which has sparked criticism from various parties. The global health organization's statement on "X" was fact-checked by internet users, and the social platform later released a community statement.

 

Critics Question World Health Organization's Stance on E-cigarettes
Translate to English: WHO post | Image source: X

 

The announcement stated: "The basis of this post is research that has not been peer-reviewed and the evidence is uncertain. The basis of this statement is approximately 120 uncertain events that have occurred since 2019."

 

Dr. Charles Gardner, a developmental neurobiologist in Brooklyn, tweeted, "Please provide peer-reviewed evidence to support the claim that e-cigarettes 'typically' trigger seizures within 24 hours. If you cannot do this, please delete your tweet. Note: I have reviewed the literature and have not found any studies showing that e-cigarettes increase the risk of seizures.

 

In addition, some users have referred to the World Health Organization as clowns and liars, claiming that they are spreading propaganda. Steve Rolles, senior policy analyst at the Transform Drug Policy Foundation, also said, "I am convinced this is nonsense. Why is the World Health Organization's stance on e-cigarettes so peculiarly out of line?"

 

Critics Question World Health Organization's Stance on E-cigarettes
Supplementary statement of the WHO post | Image source: X

 

In a community announcement on "X," a link to an editorial on e-cigarettes and epilepsy was included. The editorial, published in the Journal of Adolescent Health, discusses a 2019 study analyzing 122 cases of seizure and other neurological symptoms in individuals who reported using e-cigarettes in the past 24 hours. Due to its potential to trigger seizures, researchers suggest that participants may be at risk for nicotine-induced epilepsy and symptoms.

 

However, the editorial pointed out that the details of the study "raise questions about causality, which must be considered when assessing the actual health risks of nicotine e-cigarettes for adolescents." It also noted, "A major question is why inhaling nicotine from e-cigarettes can trigger seizures, while inhaling nicotine from traditional tobacco does not.

 

The authors point out that a person would need to inhale a large dose of nicotine to trigger a seizure, but e-cigarette devices contain much lower levels of nicotine compared to traditional cigarettes. Additionally, the toxic effects of high doses of nicotine are expected to appear within minutes of inhalation and dissipate within a few hours. The authors state, "Seizures do not seem likely to occur if there are no other systemic toxic effects present.

 

In the United States, the use of e-cigarettes has reached record levels, with over 17 million adults and 2 million children addicted to these devices. An editorial pointed out a flaw in a 2019 study, stating that the analysis of reported seizures was based on self-reporting and not always clear. Descriptions varied, with some individuals reporting severe seizures while others detailed tremors or seizure-like activity. In most cases, these events were not evaluated by medical professionals. The editorial's author noted that nicotine could potentially cause anxiety attacks and unconscious muscle contractions, leading some individuals to misinterpret these symptoms as seizures, even though they are not.

 

Despite traditional cigarette smoking rates decreasing each year, the number of people using e-cigarettes is continuously increasing, especially among middle and high school students. An analysis from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2023 found that 2.1 million children, or nearly 8% of the student population, are using these devices, with 47% of children who have tried e-cigarettes still currently using them.

 

E-cigarettes typically come in attractive flavors such as cotton candy and caramel custard, and their packaging designs appeal to younger users. Data shows that approximately 90% of young people report having used products with fruit or candy flavors.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana's Alcohol and Tobacco Commission (ATC) ordered tobacco certificate holders in September to remove certain vaping products marketed under Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG, iJOY and other brands from inventory under the state's foreign-adversary product law. The agency later listed 257 MR FOG products and 77 Lost Mary product entries as lawful for sale. The Lost Mary revision expressly stated that compliance evidence had been received for 20 additional products. 2Firsts compliance expert Kurt said potential filings could include e-liquid and ingredient-origin records, U.S. nicotine-analog supply-chain documentation and FDA premarket application status.
Regulations
Oct.08
Special Report|From CrossBar 20K to 6-Methyl Nicotine KUMI: Two Routes Into U.S. State Vape Directories?
Special Report|From CrossBar 20K to 6-Methyl Nicotine KUMI: Two Routes Into U.S. State Vape Directories?
Several U.S. states have incorporated the September 9, 2020 PMTA filing deadline into eligibility rules for certain vaping products. CrossBar 20K drew attention after appearing on Pennsylvania's 163-entry directory. A broader 2Firsts investigation found that related registration businesses also listed KUMI and CROSSBAR SIX products, with 171 KUMI-related entries across Louisiana, Nebraska and Wisconsin. Corporate records link Scott Silverman to Blue Nine LLC and VR Products I LLC. PMTA compliance expert Mr. K said historical applications and nicotine-analogue products may offer two different approaches to state-directory access.
Regulations
Oct.26
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
At InterTabac 2026, nicotine pouch growth was visible not only in brands but across equipment, raw materials and OEM manufacturing. 2Firsts interviewed AIRSCREAM commercial head Steve Moore on how many pouch factories Europe may ultimately need and where manufacturers can differentiate, from formulation and flavour to pouch materials, production consistency and customer service. The category continues to expand, but questions remain over future capacity, consolidation and the long-term structure of the supply chain.
Sep.18
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
American Vapor Manufacturers (AVM) and Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY filed separate motions on October 7, 2026, seeking to intervene on the FDA's side in a lawsuit challenging its enforcement guidance for certain e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with pending premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). Seven public health and tobacco-control organizations, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, sued the agency in July to overturn the policy. AVM argues that vacating the guidance could disrupt orders, inventory, retail distribution and investments in regulatory submissions.
Regulations
Oct.09
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04