Delay of Nicotine Ban Implementation in Perm Region

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mar.07.2024
Delay of Nicotine Ban Implementation in Perm Region
The ban on selling nicotine products in kiosks in Russia's Perm region, originally set for March 1, has not been implemented.

According to a report by 59.RU on March 6, the planned ban on the sale of nicotine products in kiosks in Russia's Perm region, which was originally scheduled to take effect on March 1, has not yet been implemented. However, according to reports, the ban is currently not in effect.

 

It is reported that the bill will be officially released in December 2023. On December 13, 2023, Act No. 261-PK stipulates that the law will come into effect on March 1, 2024, but not earlier than 90 days after the official release date.

 

Effective on March 1, 2024, but not before 90 days from its official publication.

 

This statement suggests that the bill will not be able to take effect in early March, because it was officially released only on December 15 of last year, and 90 days have not yet passed. In addition, the federal law "Mandatory Requirements for the Russian Federation" also has similar provisions:

 

Normative legal documents that stipulate mandatory requirements must come into effect on March 1st or September 1st of the respective year, but may only take effect 90 days after the official publication of the relevant normative legal document, and not before.

 

The government of the Kama region responded, "The law will be officially issued on March 15, 2024, and will take effect 90 days later."

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products have received Marketing Granted Orders (MGO) through the PMTA pathway. The authorizations were completed under the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot program in “record time,” with the FDA citing lower levels of harmful constituents while stressing that the decision applies only to the specified products and does not mean they are safe or FDA approved.
Regulations
Dec.20
Coral Springs, Florida Moves to Extend Ban on New Vape Shops as Number of Existing Stores Reaches 23
Coral Springs, Florida Moves to Extend Ban on New Vape Shops as Number of Existing Stores Reaches 23
Coral Springs, Florida is considering extending its six-month moratorium on new smoke and vape shops as it works to finalize zoning rules and regulatory measures in response to a rapid increase in such retailers in recent years. The city is already home to 23 smoke and vape shops.
Dec.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. vape firms appeal Mississippi synthetic-nicotine ban, citing FDA authority preemption
U.S. vape firms appeal Mississippi synthetic-nicotine ban, citing FDA authority preemption
A coalition of U.S. vape industry groups has appealed a Mississippi law banning the sale of e-cigarette products containing synthetic nicotine, arguing the statute effectively conditions sales on FDA authorization and unlawfully encroaches on federal regulatory authority. The law took effect in July 2025 and has already begun to be enforced.
Dec.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
JUUL Files ITC Complaint over Vaporizer Device Infringement
JUUL Files ITC Complaint over Vaporizer Device Infringement
The U.S. International Trade Commission has instituted a Section 337 investigation following a complaint filed by JUUL Labs, Inc. and VMR Products LLC. The complaint alleges that certain vaporizer devices, cartridges and related components infringe two U.S. patents. The investigation covers importation, sale for importation and post-importation sales in the United States, with the complainants seeking a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
Dec.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Wisconsin Fines Vape Retailers Nearly $13 Million for Selling Unapproved Products
Wisconsin Fines Vape Retailers Nearly $13 Million for Selling Unapproved Products
The state of Wisconsin has fined one retailer nearly USD 12.44 million and another USD 450,000 for violating the state’s new vape sales law, which took effect in September and restricts sales to an approved list of products.
Dec.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai