E-cigarette: Reexamining its Effectiveness and Regulation in Europe

Aug.14.2023
E-cigarette: Reexamining its Effectiveness and Regulation in Europe
E-cigarette sales are increasing, prompting calls for stricter regulations to curb the rising trend among teenagers in Europe.

The e-cigarette, once hailed as a smoking cessation tool, may warrant reconsideration as tobacco companies are now advocating for stricter regulations on its usage.


In recent years, the phenomenon of teenagers using e-cigarettes has been spreading across Europe.


Since 2013, the number of teenagers aged 11 to 17 in the UK who have used e-cigarettes has quadrupled. In France, over half of teenagers aged 17 have tried e-cigarettes. In Italy, the proportion of teenagers aged 11 to 17 who have used e-cigarettes in the past month has doubled since 2014, and there has also been a noticeable increase in Latvia and Romania.


While e-cigarettes are widely believed to assist adult smokers in quitting, government officials, doctors, public health experts, and the general public are now sounding the alarm over the increasing use of these products among teenagers. Even the industry itself is calling for stronger regulation.


James Murphy, director of research and science at British American Tobacco (BAT), has stated that the company is willing to take measures to reduce the appeal and accessibility of e-cigarettes to young people.


He stated:


I believe that if we establish these protective measures in our surroundings, it will further redirect the attention of adults who are interested in making a change, while making it less appealing for teenagers whom we do not want to be exposed to these products.


His comments echo those of his boss, Tadeu Marroco, the CEO of British American Tobacco, who earlier this month stated the need for "better regulations" to address the issue of youth vaping.


Since e-cigarettes first entered the market, there has been a significant shift with the emergence of small disposable e-cigarettes in soft colors and cotton candy-like flavors. These e-cigarettes are now easily obtainable from unscrupulous sellers across Europe.


A new reality has prompted people to question whether lawmakers were completely mistaken when they formulated regulations for e-cigarettes a decade ago, and if it is now necessary to amend these rules.


The intense showdown among the legislators, coupled with rumors, threats, and fierce lobbying.


On October 8, 2013, at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, tensions ran high as Linda McAvan, the chief negotiator for the Tobacco Products Directive, called for a "wise and calm" discussion, urging to avoid the "distortions" witnessed in recent weeks.


The topic of the meeting was the proposal by the European Commission to classify the majority of e-cigarettes as medicinal products, which would require them to go through a pharmaceutical authorization process. EU member states have mostly reached a consensus on this issue, but European Parliament members have not yet made a decision.


Lobbyists and avid e-cigarette users are becoming increasingly restless, fueling rumors that Brussels is planning to ban e-cigarettes. The members of parliament have been bombarded with intense lobbying tactics, with some describing the situation as unprecedented within the usual scope of parliamentary proceedings.


McCarthy, a member of the Labour Party in the UK, is also a member of the Social and Democratic Progressive Party. She stated that although the documents primarily address traditional cigarettes, the issue of e-cigarettes has quickly become a major topic of discussion.


It quickly turned into a highly aggressive lobbying campaign," the former Member of the European Parliament told Politico magazine. The CEO of an e-cigarette company was relentless, she said, leaving messages on her phone and sending emails to her, referring to McCawen as his "archenemy." She and her team had considered filing a police report.


In the end, lobbying groups and enthusiastic e-cigarette users successfully persuaded lawmakers that e-cigarettes require lenient regulatory measures.


They are nearly zealous advocates for e-cigarettes," liberal member of parliament Rebecca Taylor remarked to The New York Times, describing herself as "one of several European Parliament members who have been urged by former smokers to embrace the use of e-cigarettes.


Taylor and other members of liberal, European conservative, and European People's Party groups have proposed amendments that would eliminate the requirement for e-cigarettes to undergo medicinal authorization, only requiring authorization if they are claimed to be smoking cessation devices.


The amendment ultimately passed.


Dr. Jørgen Vestbo, a renowned clinical physician and honorary professor of respiratory medicine at the University Hospital of South Manchester in the United Kingdom, has been persistently critical of e-cigarettes. He firmly believes that transforming e-cigarettes into medical products could help prevent numerous issues that have already arisen.


Tidying up the chaos


The focus has shifted from health to attracting young people in the tobacco industry, and European regulations have generally worked well. Murphy describes it as a "fairly pragmatic regulatory framework" that has led many people to switch from smoking to e-cigarettes. He says,


This is why some of the lowest smoking rates in the world have emerged.


However, he also suggested that perhaps the rules should be adjusted to reduce the interest of teenagers in using e-cigarettes.


Murphy stated that BAT is willing to restrict the flavors of e-cigarettes to three categories, such as tobacco, mint, and fruit, while excluding candy and other novelty flavors like alcohol (which requires little effort for BAT as the company currently only offers these three flavor categories).


I believe that standards can be established regarding packaging and formatting, for example, 'these are the acceptable formats' and 'this is the permitted packaging style'.


The transformation has already begun.


The National Anti-Smoking Committee in France has proposed a ban on all flavors, while the then Health Minister, François Braun, expressed support for the prohibition of disposable e-cigarettes in May.


In Germany, the Bavarian government is pushing for a ban on disposable e-cigarettes across the European Union. The country's drug commissioner states that regulating the appearance and packaging of e-cigarettes will help reduce their usage among young people.


In the United Kingdom, the government is not only encouraging companies to seek drug licenses for their products, but it is also planning to introduce new taxes on e-cigarettes. Additionally, there are plans to offer introductory e-cigarette kits to smokers.


At the same time, the European Commission has retained the possibility of stricter e-cigarette regulation in its future revision of the Tobacco Products Directive, stating that further consideration should be given to the need for developing or clarifying regulations regarding the use of flavors and advertising promotions.


As Brussels starts considering the potential revision of regulations, lawmakers who supported the light-touch approach a decade ago now appear to be more open to regulation.


European People's Party MEP Peter Liese supported an amendment in 2013 to halt the categorization of medical products. He maintains an open stance towards implementing stricter regulations for e-cigarettes, including cracking down on the use of flavors.


He also pointed out that it is necessary to evaluate disposable e-cigarettes to determine whether they should continue to be allowed. He stated that the only reason these products exist is to attract those who are unwilling to purchase long-term use devices: "Of course, there is a hope for more children who want to quit smoking than smokers," he said.


Even e-cigarettes could potentially be included in prescriptions and could offer some help, as it would mean the product can be reimbursed, allowing individuals who truly need these products to access them at a lower price, according to Lisa.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
2Firsts First Look|China to End VAT Export Rebates on Vape Devices and Nicotine in April 2027, Following Earlier Removal for HTP Devices and Nicotine Vapes
2Firsts First Look|China to End VAT Export Rebates on Vape Devices and Nicotine in April 2027, Following Earlier Removal for HTP Devices and Nicotine Vapes
China's Ministry of Finance and State Taxation Administration announced on October 12, 2026, that value-added tax (VAT) export rebates for vape devices, nicotine and its salts, and certain non-combustible inhalation products will be eliminated from April 1, 2027. The measure adds four tobacco- and nicotine-related customs codes, including 8543400010, which covers vape devices and qualifying empty pods. China previously eliminated rebates for nicotine-containing vaping products and devices under code 8543400090 in April 2026. According to industry classification information held by 2Firsts, the latter currently corresponds to heated tobacco devices. Export excise tax refund and exemption arrangements will remain unchanged.
Special Report
Oct.12
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
DOJO officially launched the BLAST7K Fresh on September 17, 2026, introducing a UK-market prefilled pod product with 6ml of e-liquid and a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 7,000 puffs. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, the INSTA-JUICED structure and COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology, while retaining compatibility with existing BLAST pods. The launch comes less than two weeks before the UK's Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1. At the new duty rate, 6ml of vaping liquid would correspond to £1.32 in VPD. DOJO has not stated that the product's 6ml format was designed in response to the new duty.
Sep.20
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Alimentation Couche-Tard said U.S. same-store sales in its “other nicotine products” category grew at a double-digit rate in the first quarter of fiscal 2027, led by nicotine pouches, while overall U.S. same-store merchandise revenues increased 1.7%. The company also said its Canadian nicotine business continued to face regulatory pressure and illicit-market headwinds. The U.S. performance coincides with Couche-Tard's participation in efforts to reopen Canadian convenience-store access to authorized nicotine pouches, though the company has not established a direct causal link between the two.
Sep.14
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona's First Things First is pushing for an excise tax equal to 50% of the retail price of vaping products, estimating that the measure could generate about $100 million annually. The agency says its tobacco-tax revenue has fallen 47% from 2008 levels. Arizona has attempted to broaden its nicotine tax base in each of the past two years: a 2025 bill proposed a 50% wholesale-price tax, while a 2026 measure shifted to a 50% retail-price tax covering alternative nicotine products and vapor products. Separately, the state enacted HB 4001 this year to establish a new licensing and sales framework for alternative nicotine products.
Sep.21