Effects of Flavor Ban on E-Cigarette Users

Dec.02.2022
Effects of Flavor Ban on E-Cigarette Users
Less than 5% of surveyed adult e-cigarette users quit smoking due to bans, with most switching to alternative tobacco products.

A study published in Tobacco Control revealed that out of 3,500 adult e-cigarette users surveyed, less than 5% quit smoking due to bans. Instead, the majority of respondents turned to other tobacco products not covered by the ban or different flavors of e-cigarettes.


An increasing body of literature suggests that the flavorings in e-cigarettes can cause harm when inhaled, making the ban on flavors reasonable," says Deborah J. Ossip, an expert in tobacco research and professor in the Department of Public Health Sciences and Community Center. The University of Rochester Medical Center's Department of Health and Prevention was a co-author of the study. "However, the ban appears to be ineffective. People, including young people, can still obtain flavored products and are still using them.


Dr. Dongmei Li, Associate Professor of Clinical and Translational Research in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health Sciences at URMC, stated that a major concern is that the ban does not cover disposable e-cigarettes and cartridge-based e-cigarettes that use tanks instead of pods.


Other types of flavored e-cigarettes, especially disposable e-cigarettes, have become very popular after the FDA policy," says Li. "The FDA policy also did not ban mint or tobacco-flavored products - our research shows that many people turned to mint-flavored e-cigarettes after the ban. It seems that many people think that menthol is a good taste.


In the survey of respondents, nearly 30% have switched to canned or disposable flavored e-cigarettes, while another 30% have switched to mint or tobacco flavored pods. 14% have switched to combustible products like cigarettes, 5% have switched to smokeless tobacco, and less than 5% have quit using electronic cigarettes since the ban was enacted.


2FIRSTS will continue to track and report on this issue. Further updates will be available on the "2FIRSTS APP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
An exclusive 2Firsts investigation found an unpublished FDA update on e-cigarette marketing authorizations that mirrors market speculation, suggesting Glas’s application may have cleared internal review, though no official confirmation has been issued.
Regulations
Dec.21
Russian Police Seize Over 150,000 Counterfeit E-Cigarettes Worth More Than USD 1.65 Million
Russian Police Seize Over 150,000 Counterfeit E-Cigarettes Worth More Than USD 1.65 Million
Russian police in Tambov have detained a man for storing and selling unmarked e-cigarettes. Over 150,000 counterfeit e-cigarettes, cartridges, and e-liquids were seized, valued at more than 126.5 million rubles (approximately USD 1.65 million). Tests revealed that the nicotine content of the seized products exceeded the levels stated on their packaging. A criminal case has been opened under Article 171.1, Part 6 of the Russian Criminal Code.
Dec.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Survey Shows E-cigarette Use Doubles Among Young Thais
Survey Shows E-cigarette Use Doubles Among Young Thais
Thailand’s latest national health survey shows a sharp increase in e-cigarette use among people under 30, particularly among female adolescents. Researchers found that vaping has not reduced overall tobacco harm and has instead driven growth in new nicotine users, with younger ages of initiation. Public health experts urged sustained enforcement and comprehensive policies centred on banning e-cigarettes, strengthening law enforcement and expanding public awareness to protect children and youth.
Dec.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT Expects Around 2% Revenue and Operating Profit Growth in FY25
BAT Expects Around 2% Revenue and Operating Profit Growth in FY25
British American Tobacco (BAT) reaffirmed its 2026 guidance while announcing a £1.3 billion (approximately USD 1.65 billion) share buyback for FY26. The company expects around 2% growth in revenue and adjusted profit from operations for FY25. Accelerating New Category growth, driven by Velo Plus and improving U.S. Vuse performance, is expected to deliver double-digit H2 revenue growth.
Dec.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia asks Fourth Circuit to stay order blocking parts of its unauthorized-vape sales law
Virginia asks Fourth Circuit to stay order blocking parts of its unauthorized-vape sales law
Virginia has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to stay a district court order that blocks enforcement of certain provisions of a state law restricting the sale of unauthorized vaping products. The district court held the law was preempted to the extent it enforced federal requirements under the FDCA and the Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai