FDA Announces Plan to Reduce Nicotine Levels in Cigarettes and Ban Juul E-Cigarettes in the US

Jul.21.2022
FDA Announces Plan to Reduce Nicotine Levels in Cigarettes and Ban Juul E-Cigarettes in the US
The FDA plans to reduce nicotine content in traditional cigarettes and bans Juul e-cigarettes due to potential risks.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently announced plans to require tobacco companies to reduce the nicotine content in traditional cigarettes. It also announced the ban of Juul e-cigarettes in the United States, citing the company's failure to provide sufficient data on the potential risks of using its product.


Ziyad Ben Taleb, an assistant professor of public health, comes from the University of Texas at Arlington.


The methods of tobacco and nicotine consumption are constantly evolving, and this is one of the research areas at the Nicotine and Tobacco Research Laboratory (NTRL) at the University of Texas at Arlington, led by Assistant Professor of Public Health Ziyad Ben Taleb. Ben Taleb shared his thoughts on the major developments in this field.


What impact do you think the FDA's plan to require a reduction in nicotine levels in cigarettes will have?


This is a long-awaited move. It is widely known that smokers smoke because of nicotine, a notorious addictive substance, and that they are more likely to suffer from illnesses and death due to all the chemicals contained in cigarettes. Reducing the amount of nicotine will make it easier for smokers to overcome addiction and achieve sustained smoking cessation. The proposal is expected to save lives and protect public health.


Do you believe that using a certain amount of nicotine is safe?


The risk of using nicotine products depends on the method of delivery. Generally, methods that involve burning and inhaling nicotine into the lungs pose a higher risk than others. However, no tobacco product can be considered completely safe. Switching from one product to another is like replacing a flat tire with another flat tire, so the best choice is always to quit smoking altogether. However, as a smoking cessation aid, nicotine replacement therapy (such as patches, gum, and sprays) can provide some assistance to smokers who find it difficult to quit.


What is the scientific community's perspective on the health impact of electronic cigarettes?


Numerous studies indicate that electronic cigarettes have a negative impact on health, including our team's research at NTRL. Our findings focus on Juul and demonstrate that using it, like smoking, can cause short-term damage to cardiovascular function. In the long run, this may lead to heart disease for habitual users.


What do you think is the next step for Juul after their decision?


Although the decision by the US Food and Drug Administration to ban Juul is an important step towards curbing the trend of teenage e-cigarette use, it is important to emphasize that other e-cigarette brands may still be available for sale. Generally speaking, the use of e-cigarettes, regardless of the brand, can potentially have negative impacts on health. Therefore, it is necessary to continue monitoring and assessing the impact of various e-cigarette devices on the market to prevent disease and protect public health.


I'm sorry, but I cannot provide a response without context or a specific sentence/paragraph to translate. Please provide further details.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation party has proposed cutting tobacco excise by 75%, arguing that lower legal cigarette prices could narrow the gap with illicit tobacco and reduce demand for black-market products. The proposal comes as Australia continues expanding enforcement against illicit tobacco supply chains through border controls, retail inspections and organised-crime investigations. Supporters argue high taxes have contributed to illicit-market growth, while opponents warn that lower tobacco prices could undermine public-health goals. The proposal is a party policy position and has not been adopted by the Australian government.
Aug.18
Snowplus Enters Japan’s FamilyMart Network With Zero-Nicotine NEO Line and Kishidan Campaign
Snowplus Enters Japan’s FamilyMart Network With Zero-Nicotine NEO Line and Kishidan Campaign
Snowplus distributor H&S said the zero-nicotine, zero-tar NEO vaping line will begin rolling out across FamilyMart stores in Japan from September 14, 2026, excluding some locations. The DASH line will also be sold at selected FamilyMart stores in southern Kyushu and Okinawa. Snowplus simultaneously named Japanese rock band Kishidan as a brand ambassador, combining convenience-store distribution with a broader consumer marketing push in Japan.
Sep.15
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14