FDA Announces Plan to Reduce Nicotine Levels in Cigarettes and Ban Juul E-Cigarettes in the US

Jul.21.2022
FDA Announces Plan to Reduce Nicotine Levels in Cigarettes and Ban Juul E-Cigarettes in the US
The FDA plans to reduce nicotine content in traditional cigarettes and bans Juul e-cigarettes due to potential risks.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently announced plans to require tobacco companies to reduce the nicotine content in traditional cigarettes. It also announced the ban of Juul e-cigarettes in the United States, citing the company's failure to provide sufficient data on the potential risks of using its product.


Ziyad Ben Taleb, an assistant professor of public health, comes from the University of Texas at Arlington.


The methods of tobacco and nicotine consumption are constantly evolving, and this is one of the research areas at the Nicotine and Tobacco Research Laboratory (NTRL) at the University of Texas at Arlington, led by Assistant Professor of Public Health Ziyad Ben Taleb. Ben Taleb shared his thoughts on the major developments in this field.


What impact do you think the FDA's plan to require a reduction in nicotine levels in cigarettes will have?


This is a long-awaited move. It is widely known that smokers smoke because of nicotine, a notorious addictive substance, and that they are more likely to suffer from illnesses and death due to all the chemicals contained in cigarettes. Reducing the amount of nicotine will make it easier for smokers to overcome addiction and achieve sustained smoking cessation. The proposal is expected to save lives and protect public health.


Do you believe that using a certain amount of nicotine is safe?


The risk of using nicotine products depends on the method of delivery. Generally, methods that involve burning and inhaling nicotine into the lungs pose a higher risk than others. However, no tobacco product can be considered completely safe. Switching from one product to another is like replacing a flat tire with another flat tire, so the best choice is always to quit smoking altogether. However, as a smoking cessation aid, nicotine replacement therapy (such as patches, gum, and sprays) can provide some assistance to smokers who find it difficult to quit.


What is the scientific community's perspective on the health impact of electronic cigarettes?


Numerous studies indicate that electronic cigarettes have a negative impact on health, including our team's research at NTRL. Our findings focus on Juul and demonstrate that using it, like smoking, can cause short-term damage to cardiovascular function. In the long run, this may lead to heart disease for habitual users.


What do you think is the next step for Juul after their decision?


Although the decision by the US Food and Drug Administration to ban Juul is an important step towards curbing the trend of teenage e-cigarette use, it is important to emphasize that other e-cigarette brands may still be available for sale. Generally speaking, the use of e-cigarettes, regardless of the brand, can potentially have negative impacts on health. Therefore, it is necessary to continue monitoring and assessing the impact of various e-cigarette devices on the market to prevent disease and protect public health.


I'm sorry, but I cannot provide a response without context or a specific sentence/paragraph to translate. Please provide further details.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia’s Department of Home Affairs has hired Deloitte to provide data analytics, business-process, communications and project-delivery support to the Office of the Illicit Tobacco and E-Cigarette Commissioner. The government says Deloitte personnel do not provide policy advice to the Commissioner or the Australian government, with policy development and decision-making remaining with public officials. The arrangement has nevertheless drawn scrutiny because Deloitte has previously provided professional services to several tobacco and vaping companies.
Sep.03
Special Report | China Opens Draft Mandatory Heated Cigarette Standard for Comment, Multiple Heating Technologies Remain in Scope
Special Report | China Opens Draft Mandatory Heated Cigarette Standard for Comment, Multiple Heating Technologies Remain in Scope
China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA) has released a draft mandatory national standard for heated cigarettes, setting out detailed requirements for tobacco sticks, heating devices and aerosols. The proposal treats the stick and device as parts of the same product system, focuses on minimum safety and quality requirements, and leaves several heating architectures within scope.
Special Report
Jul.29
Seita’s Julia Neumaier Says France Should Target Vape Access, Not Plain Packaging
Seita’s Julia Neumaier Says France Should Target Vape Access, Not Plain Packaging
Julia Neumaier, general manager of Seita, Imperial Brands’ French subsidiary, said France should focus vaping regulation on access control, age verification, online sales and distribution channels, rather than applying tobacco-style plain packaging to vaping products.
Jul.15
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
UK Councils Seize More Than 1.3 Million Non-Compliant Vapes One Year After Disposable Ban
UK Councils Seize More Than 1.3 Million Non-Compliant Vapes One Year After Disposable Ban
One year after the UK disposable vape ban came into force, local authorities continue to seize illegal and non-compliant vaping products. FOI data compiled by nicotine retailer Northerner shows more than 1.3 million products were seized between June 2025 and May 2026, with Bolton recording the highest number of seizures and Swansea reporting the highest estimated value.
Jul.21
UK Proposes Stricter Vape Packaging Rules as Retailers Warn of £330 Million Impact
UK Proposes Stricter Vape Packaging Rules as Retailers Warn of £330 Million Impact
The UK government has launched a nationwide consultation on vape packaging, appearance and retail displays, proposing tighter rules to reduce youth appeal while industry groups warn of significant compliance costs.
Innovation
Jul.20