FDA faces scrutiny over safety of nicotine alternatives

Aug.04.2022
FDA faces scrutiny over safety of nicotine alternatives
FDA under scrutiny for lack of action on synthetic nicotine ban and delayed PMTA process. Review to be conducted by Reagan-Udall Foundation.

As we all know, the FDA has come under scrutiny for approving safer nicotine alternatives and related issues. Last month, the agency faced harsh criticism from Senators Dick Durbin (Democrat, Illinois) and Susan Collins (Republican, Maine). In a letter, the senators cited a news report and criticized the FDA for its lack of action on the "synthetic nicotine ban," stating that the FDA "appears to have once again failed to protect our nation's children.


Similarly, Chairman of the Smoke-Free Kids campaign, Matt Myers emphasizes that the FDA should exercise its authority and remove the products from the market. "All unauthorized synthetic nicotine products are now illegal, and according to the law, they must be removed from the market now, not at some uncertain date in the future.


Furthermore, the FDA has faced continuous condemnation for failing to complete the PMTA process in a timely manner at the designated deadline. Adding insult to injury, the FDA has also been forced to pause its recently issued Juul marketing denial order (MDO), citing the need for more thorough review.


Of course, to make these mistakes look like they're being taken seriously, Commissioner Califf announced a review of the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP). Commissioner Califf stated, "Every field is full of dedicated and talented people who work tirelessly on various scientific, policy, legal, and administrative activities. FDA employees should receive the best support so that they can fulfill their steadfast commitment to public health and to the American public we serve.


The audit will be carried out by a non-profit organization, the Reagan-Udall Foundation, in collaboration with unnamed experts to evaluate the processes and procedures, resources, and organizational structure of the food plan and CTP.


Is the Reagan-Udall Foundation reliable?


According to Filter, many people have expressed disappointment with the results of the self-audit announcement of the Reagan-Udall Foundation. "Many of the individuals investigating the foundation were handpicked from Reagan-Udall's board of directors, who are supporters of the safer nicotine zone," Filter reports. The foundation has not disclosed how many people participated in the audit, adding to the uncertainty around the issue. Notably, board members include Georges C. Benjamin, who is a proponent of prohibitionist organization Truth Initiative, and James E.K. Hildreth, a professor at Nashville's Meharry Medical College who has received millions of dollars in research grants from Juul.


According to a former employee of CTP interviewed by Filter, "I don't expect any major changes." It is currently unclear whether the Reagan-Udall Foundation will be a prohibitionist collaborator or a true partner to millions of adult smokers who are using e-cigarette products to quit smoking.


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been accused of failing to fulfill its regulatory authority to approve e-cigarette products that promote public health, without remorse. This is not due to an overloaded system or inadequate funding - the agency collects nearly $1 billion in user fees annually. "The FDA's bureaucrats have refused to take responsibility for this fact, which is the reality," added Amanda Wheeler, president of the American e-cigarette manufacturer.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is provided for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is solely for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the compiled article may not accurately express the same message as the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government's stance and statements regarding domestic issues, issues involving Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, as well as foreign affairs.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10
HG Innovation, linked to IMiracle and ELFBAR, wins China patent for 6-methylnicotine salts covering vaping and oral products
HG Innovation, linked to IMiracle and ELFBAR, wins China patent for 6-methylnicotine salts covering vaping and oral products
HG Innovation Limited has been granted a Chinese invention patent covering 6-methylnicotine salt formulations and their use in oral and vaping products. The technology forms salts between 6-methylnicotine and alicyclic carboxylic acids, with granted claims extending to oral products, atomization substrates and electronic atomization devices. Applicant-generated tests reported differences in oxidation stability, in-vitro cytotoxicity and aerosol heavy-metal performance compared with selected benzoate or lactate controls. HG Innovation is directly linked to the broader IMiracle and ELFBAR business network.
Sep.04
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Smoore’s first-half 2026 revenue rose 19.9%, but the results revealed growing structural risks beneath the headline growth. Heat-not-burn contributed about 61% of incremental revenue and remains driven largely by one core customer, while traditional vaping markets diverged, own-brand growth slowed and China enterprise revenue declined further. Gross profit and adjusted profit lagged revenue growth, while second-quarter revenue growth slowed to about 1.9%, putting greater focus on the quality, concentration and sustainability of Smoore’s expansion.
Capital Markets
Aug.20
Iowa Enforces Vape Registry Law as Retailers Warn Product Limits Could Increase Store Pressure
Iowa Enforces Vape Registry Law as Retailers Warn Product Limits Could Increase Store Pressure
Iowa has begun enforcing its vape registry law, requiring vape products to be registered before they can be legally sold in the state. The move follows a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to lift an injunction that had blocked enforcement. Retailers have warned that tighter product availability rules could increase pressure on vape shops. One Iowa retailer said that if only a limited number of products remain available, many stores could face significant business challenges.
Aug.06
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
Australian authorities have disclosed two major enforcement actions that go beyond product seizures and retail closures to examine how illicit tobacco and vape networks operate. On Aug. 14, the Multi Agency Strike Team said seven people had been charged and two criminal networks were valued by authorities at a combined A$80 million, or about US$56.8 million. Investigators allege the groups used bonded warehouses, freight businesses and “trusted insiders” in legitimate industries to circumvent border controls. In a separate operation on Aug. 11, more than 100 service stations were targeted as authorities sought information on illicit tobacco importation, distribution networks and the movement of sales proceeds.
Aug.17
UK Reform Party Proposes Cap of 1,000 Vape Shops Under Plan to Tighten Retail Controls
UK Reform Party Proposes Cap of 1,000 Vape Shops Under Plan to Tighten Retail Controls
The UK Reform Party has proposed limiting the number of dedicated vape shops in the country to around 1,000 as part of a plan to tighten oversight of vape retail channels. The proposal was put forward by Reform UK deputy leader and MP Lee Anderson. The plan remains a political proposal and has not become UK government policy, with no detailed legislation, implementation timeline or allocation rules announced.
Aug.10