Federal Appeals Court Rejects E-Cigarette Marketing Challenge Again.

Aug.31.2022
Federal Appeals Court Rejects E-Cigarette Marketing Challenge Again.
Federal appeals court rejects request to review FDA ban on marketing e-cigarettes, marking the seventh such loss for manufacturers.

In four separate rulings, the Federal Appeals Court has once again rejected requests from electronic cigarette manufacturers to review the FDA's marketing rejection orders (MDO). Seven companies have now lost their challenges in the circuit courts, while six have emerged victorious.


A three-judge panel in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled against Gripum LLC, an Illinois-based company producing bottled e-cigarette liquid under several brands, and upheld the decision of the FDA.


The company known as Gripum, also referred to as the OPMH project, submitted a pre-market tobacco application (PMTA) in September 2020 for approximately 200 bottled e-liquid products with non-tobacco flavors. The application was received by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products in September. On August 8th, 2021, Gripum submitted a letter of intent for review and was granted a delay on FDA enforcement in November of the same year. On April 20th of this year, the company participated in an oral argument in court.


Gripum alleges that the FDA's refusal to allow marketing is arbitrary and capricious, as neither Congress (in the Tobacco Control Act) nor the agency (in its guidance documents) have "established any necessary, discernible standards" to determine whether Gripum's products are "appropriate for the protection of public health." The company also argues that the FDA changed the evidence standard for PMTAs after the application deadline had passed and failed to conduct personalized PMTA reviews as required by the Tobacco Control Act.


The Federal Appeals Court still faces multiple challenges on other issues, as well as unresolved internal appeals within the FDA.


The court rejected all three arguments presented by Gripum, stating that the FDA's "method of decision-making was both reasonable and in accordance with the Tobacco Control Act.


Two electronic cigarette manufacturers, Triton Distribution and Vaptasia of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, as well as four companies from Washington, D.C., had previously failed in similar reasoning during two rounds of appeals. However, last week, six small electronic cigarette companies won support for their appeal against the FDA's decision from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.


Several federal appellate courts still have multiple challenges, and there are unresolved internal appeals within the FDA.


Two of the three judges who opposed Gripum were nominated to the court by the Democratic president, while the third was nominated by a Republican. The headquarters of the Seventh Circuit Court is located in Chicago and covers appeals from Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin.


Gripum can now seek an en banc review of the case (a full rehearing by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals). Triton and Vaptasia are seeking this option in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry communication and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation ability, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS aligns completely with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there are any violations, please contact us for removal.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Wisconsin Fines Vape Retailers Nearly $13 Million for Selling Unapproved Products
Wisconsin Fines Vape Retailers Nearly $13 Million for Selling Unapproved Products
The state of Wisconsin has fined one retailer nearly USD 12.44 million and another USD 450,000 for violating the state’s new vape sales law, which took effect in September and restricts sales to an approved list of products.
Dec.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kazakhstan’s Astana Baikonur District Fines Illegal Smokeless Tobacco Sales Over USD 5,800
Kazakhstan’s Astana Baikonur District Fines Illegal Smokeless Tobacco Sales Over USD 5,800
Authorities in Astana’s Baikonur District have intensified enforcement against illegal smokeless tobacco and related products in 2025. Police conducted 59 inspection raids, identifying 63 cases of illegal sales of smokeless tobacco (nasvay). Total fines imposed reached KZT 3,096,450(approximately USD 5,880). Officials said inspections and preventive outreach will continue.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products have received Marketing Granted Orders (MGO) through the PMTA pathway. The authorizations were completed under the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot program in “record time,” with the FDA citing lower levels of harmful constituents while stressing that the decision applies only to the specified products and does not mean they are safe or FDA approved.
Regulations
Dec.20
Kardinal to Launch Dual Open-System Devices Globally in Q1 2026
Kardinal to Launch Dual Open-System Devices Globally in Q1 2026
Kardinal OS and Syn Signal Strategic Expansion in Open-System ENDS
Dec.31
Kansas Lawmakers Hear SB 355 to License E-Cigarette Makers, Citing Illicit China Imports
Kansas Lawmakers Hear SB 355 to License E-Cigarette Makers, Citing Illicit China Imports
Kansas lawmakers held a Senate committee hearing on Senate Bill 355 on Jan. 27. The proposal would require e-cigarette manufacturers—potentially affecting distributors as well—to obtain a state license, expanding oversight beyond retailers.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Alabama Senate Passes SB9 to Ban Vaping in Indoor Public Places
Alabama Senate Passes SB9 to Ban Vaping in Indoor Public Places
Alabama’s Senate approved SB9 by a 31–1 vote, expanding existing indoor smoking restrictions to include vaping in a wide range of public places. The bill keeps the current $25 fine, renames the state’s Clean Indoor Air Act, and now heads to the House. If enacted, it would take effect on Oct. 1, 2026.
Feb.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai