Federal Appeals Court Rejects E-Cigarette Marketing Challenge Again.

Aug.31.2022
Federal Appeals Court Rejects E-Cigarette Marketing Challenge Again.
Federal appeals court rejects request to review FDA ban on marketing e-cigarettes, marking the seventh such loss for manufacturers.

In four separate rulings, the Federal Appeals Court has once again rejected requests from electronic cigarette manufacturers to review the FDA's marketing rejection orders (MDO). Seven companies have now lost their challenges in the circuit courts, while six have emerged victorious.


A three-judge panel in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled against Gripum LLC, an Illinois-based company producing bottled e-cigarette liquid under several brands, and upheld the decision of the FDA.


The company known as Gripum, also referred to as the OPMH project, submitted a pre-market tobacco application (PMTA) in September 2020 for approximately 200 bottled e-liquid products with non-tobacco flavors. The application was received by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products in September. On August 8th, 2021, Gripum submitted a letter of intent for review and was granted a delay on FDA enforcement in November of the same year. On April 20th of this year, the company participated in an oral argument in court.


Gripum alleges that the FDA's refusal to allow marketing is arbitrary and capricious, as neither Congress (in the Tobacco Control Act) nor the agency (in its guidance documents) have "established any necessary, discernible standards" to determine whether Gripum's products are "appropriate for the protection of public health." The company also argues that the FDA changed the evidence standard for PMTAs after the application deadline had passed and failed to conduct personalized PMTA reviews as required by the Tobacco Control Act.


The Federal Appeals Court still faces multiple challenges on other issues, as well as unresolved internal appeals within the FDA.


The court rejected all three arguments presented by Gripum, stating that the FDA's "method of decision-making was both reasonable and in accordance with the Tobacco Control Act.


Two electronic cigarette manufacturers, Triton Distribution and Vaptasia of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, as well as four companies from Washington, D.C., had previously failed in similar reasoning during two rounds of appeals. However, last week, six small electronic cigarette companies won support for their appeal against the FDA's decision from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.


Several federal appellate courts still have multiple challenges, and there are unresolved internal appeals within the FDA.


Two of the three judges who opposed Gripum were nominated to the court by the Democratic president, while the third was nominated by a Republican. The headquarters of the Seventh Circuit Court is located in Chicago and covers appeals from Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin.


Gripum can now seek an en banc review of the case (a full rehearing by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals). Triton and Vaptasia are seeking this option in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry communication and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation ability, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS aligns completely with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there are any violations, please contact us for removal.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

2Firsts Observation | Element Vape Launches “Made in USA” Section as Product Pages Show “Assembled in USA” and “Made in USA” Labels
2Firsts Observation | Element Vape Launches “Made in USA” Section as Product Pages Show “Assembled in USA” and “Made in USA” Labels
Element Vape, a U.S. online vaping retailer, uses origin labels such as “Made in USA” and “Assembled in USA” across disposable vape product pages and a dedicated collection page, grouping items under “Made in USA Disposable Vapes,” but the platform does not disclose on its public pages the applicable standards or evidentiary basis for these different claims.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT says a U.S. import block on some disposable vapes could cut illegal sales by about a third
BAT says a U.S. import block on some disposable vapes could cut illegal sales by about a third
Reuters reported that British American Tobacco (BAT) CEO Tadeu Marroco said a potential U.S. move to block imports of some disposable vapes could reduce the market for unregulated e-cigarettes by as much as a third, though any impact is unlikely before 2027.
Feb.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dalton, Georgia considers new licensing rules and caps for vape shops
Dalton, Georgia considers new licensing rules and caps for vape shops
Dalton, Georgia is weighing a proposal to require city licenses for vape shops, limit how many can operate within city limits, and impose a 1,000-foot buffer for new shops from schools and other community facilities. City officials say the ordinance would not eliminate existing vape shops outright, though some may be impacted if ownership changes or licenses expire.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT FY2025 Results: New Categories Contribution Expands as Smokeless Share Reaches 18.2%
BAT FY2025 Results: New Categories Contribution Expands as Smokeless Share Reaches 18.2%
British American Tobacco reported FY2025 revenue of £25.61 billion, down 1.0% on a reported basis but up 2.1% at constant currency. New Categories revenue rose 5.5%, with category contribution increasing 77%. Smokeless products accounted for 18.2% of group revenue.
Feb.12
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
A Colorado vape industry trade group says Denver’s voter-approved flavored tobacco sales ban is unconstitutional and too vague to enforce. The group is asking a state court for a permanent injunction blocking enforcement of Ordinance 24-1765 and for a declaration allowing flavored tobacco and vape sales, citing state constitutional vagueness concerns and multiple U.S. constitutional issues.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris Japan adds “Electric Purple” to IQOS ILUMA i range, expands to convenience stores from Feb. 3
Philip Morris Japan adds “Electric Purple” to IQOS ILUMA i range, expands to convenience stores from Feb. 3
Philip Morris Japan (PMJ) said on Jan. 29 it has introduced “Electric Purple” as a new standard color option for its IQOS ILUMA i heated tobacco device lineup, covering three models with prices unchanged. The new color will be available from Jan. 29 via the company’s official online and store channels, with sales expanding to convenience stores and some tobacco retailers from Feb. 3.
Jan.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai