Federal Judge Allows Collective Lawsuit Against Juul Marketing

Jun.30.2022
Federal Judge Allows Collective Lawsuit Against Juul Marketing
A US federal judge allows collective lawsuits against Juul, accusing the company of misleading marketing and demanding compensation for its purchasers.

A federal judge has permitted both adult and underage individuals who have purchased Juul e-cigarettes to file a collective lawsuit, demanding compensation from the company for deceptive marketing practices.

 

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge William Orrick certified four groups, consisting of adults and minors both nationwide and in California, but rejected arguments made by Juul and its largest shareholder, tobacco giant Altria Group Inc., stating that the potential members of the collective were too diverse to bring a lawsuit for their claims together.

 

These class-action lawsuits do not accuse the product of causing bodily harm, but rather demand a refund of the money spent on purchasing Juul products.

 

The above is part of the multi-district litigation being handled by Orrick, which includes personal injury claims and lawsuits brought by local governments and school districts alleging that Juul fueled an epidemic of youth addiction.

 

Lawyers for plaintiffs Juul and Altria did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

The economic loss claims allege that Juul downplayed the addictive nature of its products and, had it not been for deceptive marketing, consumers would not have purchased these products or would have spent less money on them.

 

Juul argues that they should not be classified as a class-action lawsuit because different consumers were exposed to different advertisements, and some individuals became addicted while others did not.

 

However, Orrick believes that these differences are "largely immaterial under the legal theory being asserted.

 

Under pressure from regulators, Juul removed popular flavors such as mango and cucumber from retail stores in 2018 and closed its social media channels on Instagram and Facebook.

 

Earlier this month, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the removal of all Juul e-cigarettes from the market, but this decision was temporarily halted by the federal appeals court.

 

Juul has agreed to pay over $87 million to settle charges related to its marketing of products to minors with four states.

 

Source: Reuters

 

This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Juul Wins UK Court Injunction, Ending Five-Year Legal Battle Against Chinese Vape Infringers
Juul Wins UK Court Injunction, Ending Five-Year Legal Battle Against Chinese Vape Infringers
The UK High Court has granted U.S. e-cigarette manufacturer Juul Labs a permanent injunction against four Chinese companies, bringing an end to a five-year patent and trademark infringement case. The defendants — Greensun Technology, Ouch, Gaish, and Airsmo Tech — failed to respond to any court communications or legal filings.
Oct.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Indonesian Police to Crack Down on Etomidate-Laced Vapes
Indonesian Police to Crack Down on Etomidate-Laced Vapes
Indonesia’s National Police Criminal Investigation Department (Bareskrim Polri) will continue to take enforcement action against users and distributors of etomidate-laced vape liquids, even though the substance is not yet classified as a narcotic. Brigadier General Eko Hadi Santoso, Director of Narcotics Crimes, said etomidate is an anaesthetic drug regulated under Health Law No. 17 of 2023, but has not been listed as a narcotic or psychotropic substance.
Oct.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Altria and NJOY Sue ITC, Claim Judge Appointment Process Is Unconstitutional
Altria and NJOY Sue ITC, Claim Judge Appointment Process Is Unconstitutional
Altria Group and its NJOY subsidiary have filed a lawsuit in Virginia federal court challenging the U.S. International Trade Commission’s process for appointing administrative law judges. The companies allege the system violates the U.S. Constitution and seek to halt an ITC patent investigation initiated by rival Juul.
Nov.10
QISI’s Dongguan Factory Posts Recruitment Notice for Production Positions
QISI’s Dongguan Factory Posts Recruitment Notice for Production Positions
QISI’s Dongguan factory has posted new production job openings, following earlier reports of a shutdown at its Zhuhai site.
Oct.15
Kentucky to Require Tobacco and Vape Retailers to Be Licensed Starting January 2026
Kentucky to Require Tobacco and Vape Retailers to Be Licensed Starting January 2026
The Kentucky Public Protection Cabinet has reminded all businesses selling tobacco, nicotine, and vapor products that they must be licensed by the Kentucky Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) by January 1, 2026. The requirement stems from Senate Bill 100, signed into law by Governor Andy Beshear on March 24, 2025, aimed at strengthening youth protection and enforcing compliance against unlicensed sales.
Nov.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK plans law to license vape retailers; unlicensed sales could face heavy fines
UK plans law to license vape retailers; unlicensed sales could face heavy fines
The UK plans a national licensing regime for vape and tobacco sales, making unlicensed retail illegal, and will consult experts on flavours, nicotine strength, packaging and design.
Oct.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai