Federal Judge Allows Collective Lawsuit Against Juul Marketing

Jun.30.2022
Federal Judge Allows Collective Lawsuit Against Juul Marketing
A US federal judge allows collective lawsuits against Juul, accusing the company of misleading marketing and demanding compensation for its purchasers.

A federal judge has permitted both adult and underage individuals who have purchased Juul e-cigarettes to file a collective lawsuit, demanding compensation from the company for deceptive marketing practices.

 

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge William Orrick certified four groups, consisting of adults and minors both nationwide and in California, but rejected arguments made by Juul and its largest shareholder, tobacco giant Altria Group Inc., stating that the potential members of the collective were too diverse to bring a lawsuit for their claims together.

 

These class-action lawsuits do not accuse the product of causing bodily harm, but rather demand a refund of the money spent on purchasing Juul products.

 

The above is part of the multi-district litigation being handled by Orrick, which includes personal injury claims and lawsuits brought by local governments and school districts alleging that Juul fueled an epidemic of youth addiction.

 

Lawyers for plaintiffs Juul and Altria did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

The economic loss claims allege that Juul downplayed the addictive nature of its products and, had it not been for deceptive marketing, consumers would not have purchased these products or would have spent less money on them.

 

Juul argues that they should not be classified as a class-action lawsuit because different consumers were exposed to different advertisements, and some individuals became addicted while others did not.

 

However, Orrick believes that these differences are "largely immaterial under the legal theory being asserted.

 

Under pressure from regulators, Juul removed popular flavors such as mango and cucumber from retail stores in 2018 and closed its social media channels on Instagram and Facebook.

 

Earlier this month, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the removal of all Juul e-cigarettes from the market, but this decision was temporarily halted by the federal appeals court.

 

Juul has agreed to pay over $87 million to settle charges related to its marketing of products to minors with four states.

 

Source: Reuters

 

This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Philippine Tobacco Control Coalition Backs Raising Legal Age for Vape and Tobacco Products to 25
Philippine Tobacco Control Coalition Backs Raising Legal Age for Vape and Tobacco Products to 25
A coalition of health and child rights advocates in the Philippines said it supports Health Secretary Teodoro Herbosa’s call to raise the legal age restriction for vape and tobacco products from 18 to 25. The group said scientific evidence shows that the brain of a young person continues to develop until the mid-20s, and that nicotine exposure during that period can cause lasting impairment in impulse control, learning, and mood regulation.
Mar.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Imperial Brands to Close Langenhagen Cigarette Factory by 2027
Imperial Brands to Close Langenhagen Cigarette Factory by 2027
Imperial Brands said it will gradually close the Reemtsma factory in Langenhagen near Hanover by 2027 after efforts to find a buyer failed to produce a sustainable agreement. The factory has produced cigarettes since 1971 and currently affects around 600 employees. The company said it had examined all realistic options over recent months but did not receive a binding offer from a potential buyer.
Mar.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippine DTI Says Flavored Vape Products With Minor-Appealing Descriptors Are “100 Percent Smuggled”
Philippine DTI Says Flavored Vape Products With Minor-Appealing Descriptors Are “100 Percent Smuggled”
A Philippine Department of Trade and Industry official told a Senate hearing on vaping regulations that flavored vape products marketed with descriptors attractive to minors are “100 percent smuggled” and did not pass the agency’s licensing process.
Mar.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bangladesh High Court rule targets vape-ban clause; fines up to about $1,635 cited
Bangladesh High Court rule targets vape-ban clause; fines up to about $1,635 cited
Bangladesh’s High Court issued a rule asking why Section 6(G) of the Smoking and Tobacco Products Usage (Control) Act, 2005 — which bans the import, supply and sale of vapes and e-cigarettes — should not be declared unconstitutional and illegal.
Mar.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Belarus plans to tighten licensing for e-cigarette and e-liquid trade; Lukashenko expresses support
Belarus plans to tighten licensing for e-cigarette and e-liquid trade; Lukashenko expresses support
A report says Belarus plans to tighten, at the legislative level, the licensing of trade in electronic cigarettes and related mixtures (e-liquids). The draft law was discussed at a meeting chaired by President Alexander Lukashenko with the leadership of the Council of Ministers, according to a BelTA correspondent.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
During the “Toxicological Profile” session at FDA’s Feb 10 PMTA roundtable, officials outlined the carcinogenicity tiering system and Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) framework used in ENDS reviews under the APPH standard. Small manufacturers questioned database transparency, exposure assumptions, and the existence of clear compliance benchmarks. FDA reiterated toxicological risk is assessed case by case within a broader population-level determination.
Feb.11