Federal Judge Allows Collective Lawsuit Against Juul Marketing

Jun.30.2022
Federal Judge Allows Collective Lawsuit Against Juul Marketing
A US federal judge allows collective lawsuits against Juul, accusing the company of misleading marketing and demanding compensation for its purchasers.

A federal judge has permitted both adult and underage individuals who have purchased Juul e-cigarettes to file a collective lawsuit, demanding compensation from the company for deceptive marketing practices.

 

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge William Orrick certified four groups, consisting of adults and minors both nationwide and in California, but rejected arguments made by Juul and its largest shareholder, tobacco giant Altria Group Inc., stating that the potential members of the collective were too diverse to bring a lawsuit for their claims together.

 

These class-action lawsuits do not accuse the product of causing bodily harm, but rather demand a refund of the money spent on purchasing Juul products.

 

The above is part of the multi-district litigation being handled by Orrick, which includes personal injury claims and lawsuits brought by local governments and school districts alleging that Juul fueled an epidemic of youth addiction.

 

Lawyers for plaintiffs Juul and Altria did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

The economic loss claims allege that Juul downplayed the addictive nature of its products and, had it not been for deceptive marketing, consumers would not have purchased these products or would have spent less money on them.

 

Juul argues that they should not be classified as a class-action lawsuit because different consumers were exposed to different advertisements, and some individuals became addicted while others did not.

 

However, Orrick believes that these differences are "largely immaterial under the legal theory being asserted.

 

Under pressure from regulators, Juul removed popular flavors such as mango and cucumber from retail stores in 2018 and closed its social media channels on Instagram and Facebook.

 

Earlier this month, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the removal of all Juul e-cigarettes from the market, but this decision was temporarily halted by the federal appeals court.

 

Juul has agreed to pay over $87 million to settle charges related to its marketing of products to minors with four states.

 

Source: Reuters

 

This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

BAT rolls out VELO nicotine pouches in Argentina as social media buzzes about ZYN distribution
BAT rolls out VELO nicotine pouches in Argentina as social media buzzes about ZYN distribution
BAT Argentina says it has launched VELO nicotine pouches in Argentina, positioning the product as an adult alternative that contains no tobacco and involves no combustion. At the same time, social media discussion and media reporting indicate that Philip Morris International’s ZYN nicotine pouches are also being distributed through Argentine channels.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Indonesia’s Vape Excise Revenue Rises 7.38% in 2025 to $170.4M Amid Broader Tobacco Excise Decline
Indonesia’s Vape Excise Revenue Rises 7.38% in 2025 to $170.4M Amid Broader Tobacco Excise Decline
Indonesia’s customs data show vape (REL) excise revenue reached Rp 2.84 trillion in 2025 (≈$170.4 million), up 7.38% year over year. The gain came even as overall tobacco excise revenue declined. Minimum retail price benchmarks (HJE) for vape products rose in 2025, while excise rates remained unchanged from 2024; open-system e-liquids accounted for the largest share of revenue.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Azerbaijan Imposes Comprehensive E-Cigarette Ban Covering Import, Export, Sales and Use, Effective April 1
Azerbaijan Imposes Comprehensive E-Cigarette Ban Covering Import, Export, Sales and Use, Effective April 1
Azerbaijan has approved amendments to its tobacco law that introduce a comprehensive ban on e-cigarettes and their components, covering import, export, production, storage, wholesale and retail sales, and use. Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes are classified as tobacco products under the revised framework. The law takes effect on April 1, 2026.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Uruguay Lawmaker Proposes Ban on Smoking and Vaping in Playgrounds and Bus Stops
Uruguay Lawmaker Proposes Ban on Smoking and Vaping in Playgrounds and Bus Stops
A bill introduced by Uruguayan lawmaker Álvaro Dastugue proposes banning smoking and vaping in public spaces that include children’s play areas, as well as at bus stops and nearby waiting zones. The draft legislation aims to reduce involuntary exposure to smoke and aerosols from tobacco, marijuana and electronic vaping devices.
Dec.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
A Colorado vape industry trade group says Denver’s voter-approved flavored tobacco sales ban is unconstitutional and too vague to enforce. The group is asking a state court for a permanent injunction blocking enforcement of Ordinance 24-1765 and for a declaration allowing flavored tobacco and vape sales, citing state constitutional vagueness concerns and multiple U.S. constitutional issues.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai