Hidden Dangers in E-Cigarette Products: A Health Hazard

Aug.08.2024
Hidden Dangers in E-Cigarette Products: A Health Hazard
Duke University researchers reveal tobacco companies substituting unknown, potentially harmful chemicals for nicotine in e-cigarettes to avoid regulations.

According to Mirage News on August 8th, health researchers at Duke University in North Carolina reported that some tobacco companies have started using alternative chemicals with similar characteristics but unknown health impacts to replace nicotine in e-cigarette products in order to circumvent public health regulations.


In a research letter published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on August 7th, researchers from Duke University and Yale University also found that the quantities of these chemicals (known as nicotine analogs) were not accurately disclosed on the packaging.


The study's co-author, Senior Research Scientist Sairam V. Jabba, D.V.M., Ph.D., of Duke University School of Medicine, stated that...


E-cigarette products containing nicotine are restricted by federal law, prohibiting sales to individuals under the age of 21.


Currently, nicotine analogs are not restricted by FDA regulations, and their health effects have not been studied. Our analysis of some e-cigarette products containing analogs sold in the United States found significant and concerning discrepancies between the claimed ingredients and the actual ingredients. Furthermore, manufacturers may be trying to circumvent FDA tobacco regulation.


The study emphasizes that a chemical compound called 6-methyl nicotine is shown in rodent experiments to be more effective and more toxic than nicotine in targeting brain nicotine receptors. Another chemical compound called nicotinamide is advertised as targeting the same brain receptors, although evidence suggests it does not bind to these receptors.


These nicotine analogs are added to flavored e-cigarettes, previous studies have shown that these e-cigarettes are more popular among young people and first-time e-cigarette users.


Jabba and colleagues, including co-senior author Sven Eric Jordt, Ph.D., analyzed a e-cigarette product called Spree Bar, which has at least nine flavors and is labeled as containing 5% 6-methylnicotine. The research findings showed that the actual chemical content was about 88% lower than what was indicated on the label. This e-cigarette also contains an artificial sweetener that is 13,000 times sweeter than sucrose, as well as an artificial cooling agent that mimics the effect of mint.


The second brand of e-cigarette (sold under the names Nixotine, Nixodine, Nixamide, and Nic-Safe) contains a nicotine analogue called niacin, with levels lower than indicated on the label, and combined with an undisclosed amount of 6-methyl nicotine. This brand does not contain any sweeteners or cooling agents.


These products appear to be designed to circumvent laws and regulations aimed at protecting people, especially children, from the harmful effects of smoking and tobacco use. We do not know what effects these chemicals may have when heated and inhaled. These questions should be answered before allowing the products to be marketed.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
The FDA has authorized four additional on! nicotine pouches, bringing the U.S. total to 30. The decision marks another outcome of the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot, whose communication and review practices are now being applied more broadly across the category. It also extends Helix’s authorized portfolio from on! PLUS to the earlier on! line. Yet all FDA-authorized nicotine pouches still come from subsidiaries of PMI or Altria, underscoring how concentrated U.S. regulatory access remains.
Aug.05
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia's digital labeling regime for reusable e-cigarettes and similar personal vaping devices entered its first mandatory phase in September 2026. From September 1, manufacturers, importers and other market participants must register with the national Chestny ZNAK tracking system. From December 1, newly manufactured and imported covered devices will be required to carry digital identification codes and be reported as entering circulation. Russia has also issued new operational guidance for imports, marking the transition from a voluntary pilot to phased mandatory implementation.
Sep.15
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Smoore’s first-half 2026 revenue rose 19.9%, but the results revealed growing structural risks beneath the headline growth. Heat-not-burn contributed about 61% of incremental revenue and remains driven largely by one core customer, while traditional vaping markets diverged, own-brand growth slowed and China enterprise revenue declined further. Gross profit and adjusted profit lagged revenue growth, while second-quarter revenue growth slowed to about 1.9%, putting greater focus on the quality, concentration and sustainability of Smoore’s expansion.
Capital Markets
Aug.20
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04