High School Joins Lawsuit Against E-Cigarette Manufacturer JUUL

Aug.03.2022
High School Joins Lawsuit Against E-Cigarette Manufacturer JUUL
School district in Massachusetts joins nationwide lawsuit against e-cigarette maker JUUL for marketing to teenagers.

A high school student was using an electronic cigarette near a school in Cambridge, Massachusetts.


The Pittsburgh school district is joining others across the nation in filing a lawsuit against an electronic cigarette manufacturer due to the prevalence of vaping in schools.


On Monday, the education board unanimously voted to participate in multi-district lawsuits against JUUL. Attorney Emma Hodson stated that the company is facing lawsuits from multiple school districts, including some in North Carolina, regarding their marketing practices targeted towards teenagers.


Chena Cayton, the principal of Ayden Grifton High School, has reported to the school board that her school is encountering some problems due to an increase in smoking. Cayton says, "Students have had seizures due to excessive nicotine intake." She explains that the concentration of nicotine in e-cigarettes is much higher than in traditional cigarettes. "Therefore, we have had to call upon resources to help our students.


According to Consumer Reports, as of July 2021, there have been over 2,000 lawsuits filed against JUUL by consumer advocacy groups. This includes class-action and district cases, as well as lawsuits filed by various states, cities, and counties. In its first state settlement, JUUL agreed to pay $40 million to North Carolina and ceased marketing efforts targeting individuals under the age of 21.


Hodgson stated, "There was a time when nicotine use among teenagers was rapidly decreasing. Then, when e-cigarettes were initially introduced as a smoking cessation device, the use of nicotine-containing products among teenagers skyrocketed once again.


She presented information from the New England Journal of Medicine and the New York Times, which indicated that from 2017 to 2019, the proportion of teenagers attempting to use nicotine products more than doubled. This growth was seen in eighth, tenth, and twelfth grades, with one in four high school students reporting that they had tried vaping.


Hodson stated that JUUL targeted teenagers through advertisements in magazines, on television networks, and even educational websites. They also created products with flavors that appeal to children.


Hodson stated, "They've made a lot of money in the teenage market." He referenced a report from Forbes which revealed that JUUL's sales grew by 700% in 2016 and nearly doubled in 2019.


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the sale of JUUL e-cigarettes in June, but two weeks later, it suspended the order.


Hodson said that e-cigarettes, which are small in size and easy to conceal, have posed a disciplinary challenge to schools, whereby administrators must spend time dealing with violations. Additionally, she stated that due to students disposing of the e-cigarettes in toilets to avoid being caught, it has caused physical damage to the school's plumbing system.


The Pittsburgh school system is set to join the Wake County public school system, with other schools being represented by the Greensboro-based law firm Wood, Blankenbaker and Hooven. Superintendent Hodson stated that the risk of participating in the lawsuit is minimal, as the company representing them will not receive compensation if the claim is not successful. She added that any funds obtained through a settlement would go towards education, prevention, and anti-smoking efforts.


Sheriff Ethan Renck stated that he anticipates more regions to join the lawsuit.


I have spoken with the school principal," he said. "What they are seeing at the school is a real challenge. It is both a physical challenge and an educational challenge.


Kaiden stated that education requires not only students but also parents. In some cases, parents might provide smoking devices to underage students.


She said, "We need to have a conversation with the School Resource Officer (SRO) and parents, letting them know that they can be sued. We have had numerous parents ask us for e-cigarettes because they believe they are expensive. I don't think parents understand the impact these things could have on our students.


District 8 representative Melinda Fagundus, who is also a practicing nurse, has expressed agreement.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information, intended for industry professionals to exchange and study.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is intended solely for industry exchanges and research.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, this article may not accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on all domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign related statements and positions.


Copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.


This is a serious issue," she said. "The lawsuit will help raise awareness. It's not a safe thing. It may not smell like cigarette smoke, but that doesn't mean it won't harm your lungs.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Wall Street Journal: U.S. FDA Plans Faster Vape and Nicotine Pouch Reviews, Revisit of 2021 PMTA Rule
Wall Street Journal: U.S. FDA Plans Faster Vape and Nicotine Pouch Reviews, Revisit of 2021 PMTA Rule
The Trump administration is preparing changes intended to accelerate FDA market authorization reviews for e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches, according to The Wall Street Journal. The FDA is expected to revisit its 2021 PMTA rule and may simplify some scientific study requirements and shorten review times. The agency has not formally announced the changes. Over the past year, the FDA has already accelerated nicotine-pouch reviews, expanded ENDS authorizations and upgraded its CTP Portal NextGen application system. As of August 2026, 43 nicotine pouch products and 48 e-cigarette products had received FDA marketing authorization.
Sep.24
Special Report|CrossBar's High-Puff Vapes Draw Attention on Pennsylvania's 163-Product Directory as Link Between Earlier 1.3mL PMTA Filings and New 13mL Products Remains Unclear
Special Report|CrossBar's High-Puff Vapes Draw Attention on Pennsylvania's 163-Product Directory as Link Between Earlier 1.3mL PMTA Filings and New 13mL Products Remains Unclear
Pennsylvania began enforcing its electronic nicotine delivery system directory restrictions on October 19, 2026. Among 163 product listings recorded before enforcement, four CrossBar 20K disposables stood out with 13mL capacity, advertised puff counts of up to 20,000 and a flattened design distinct from conventional pod systems and compact disposables. Historical records identify earlier 1.3mL CrossBar products associated with Romo LLC, while newer 13mL products appeared in several state directories beginning in 2025 under entities including Blue Nine LLC. PMTA compliance expert Mr. K identified amendments and application ownership transfers as possible regulatory mechanisms, although neither has been confirmed in this case. Separately, Reynolds' $7.5 million acquisition of 16 PACHA products and related assets illustrates the commercial value of products linked to historic PMTA submissions.
Special Report
Oct.22
RLX Technology Dropped From FTSE All-World as International Business Reaches 68.5% of Q2 Revenue
RLX Technology Dropped From FTSE All-World as International Business Reaches 68.5% of Q2 Revenue
RLX Technology (NYSE: RLX) has been removed from the FTSE All-World Index, effective September 21. FTSE Russell records show RLX was already part of its global equity index universe by 2022, when its American depositary receipts were classified as China Large Cap securities. Trading volume rose to about 44.77 million shares on September 18, roughly 23 times the previous session's volume. RLX reported RMB1.0105 billion in second-quarter revenue, up 14.8% year over year, with international operations contributing 68.5%. The company also acquired a 51% stake in one of Western Europe's largest distributors of next-generation smoke-free and FMCG products in July.
Sep.22
Product | PIXL Adds 6ml PIXL 5K in UK Alongside 12ml PIXL 8000 as Vape Duty Takes Effect
Product | PIXL Adds 6ml PIXL 5K in UK Alongside 12ml PIXL 8000 as Vape Duty Takes Effect
Vaping brand PIXL has introduced the PIXL 5K reusable prefilled pod device in the UK, featuring a 2ml prefilled pod and a 4ml refill container with a combined e-liquid capacity of 6ml. The device uses 20mg/ml nicotine salt e-liquid and is advertised to deliver up to approximately 5,000 puffs. Available through UK retailers by August 2026, the PIXL 5K sits alongside the existing 12ml PIXL 8000. The UK's Vaping Products Duty took effect on October 1 at £0.22 per millilitre, producing theoretical duty amounts of £1.32 and £2.64 for the two products' respective full refill sets.
product
Oct.10
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for an oral nicotine delivery product designed to let users actively adjust nicotine release. The product embeds two types of nicotine reservoirs with different wall thicknesses and positions inside a deformable matrix. Pressure applied with the tongue or lips can rupture the reservoirs and accelerate nicotine release. In simulated oral tests, several patent examples showed sharply higher peak nicotine release rates as applied force increased from 0 N to 1 N and 3 N. The filing explores a shift from preset release profiles toward user-triggered nicotine delivery.
Sep.01
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23