High School Joins Lawsuit Against E-Cigarette Manufacturer JUUL

Aug.03.2022
High School Joins Lawsuit Against E-Cigarette Manufacturer JUUL
School district in Massachusetts joins nationwide lawsuit against e-cigarette maker JUUL for marketing to teenagers.

A high school student was using an electronic cigarette near a school in Cambridge, Massachusetts.


The Pittsburgh school district is joining others across the nation in filing a lawsuit against an electronic cigarette manufacturer due to the prevalence of vaping in schools.


On Monday, the education board unanimously voted to participate in multi-district lawsuits against JUUL. Attorney Emma Hodson stated that the company is facing lawsuits from multiple school districts, including some in North Carolina, regarding their marketing practices targeted towards teenagers.


Chena Cayton, the principal of Ayden Grifton High School, has reported to the school board that her school is encountering some problems due to an increase in smoking. Cayton says, "Students have had seizures due to excessive nicotine intake." She explains that the concentration of nicotine in e-cigarettes is much higher than in traditional cigarettes. "Therefore, we have had to call upon resources to help our students.


According to Consumer Reports, as of July 2021, there have been over 2,000 lawsuits filed against JUUL by consumer advocacy groups. This includes class-action and district cases, as well as lawsuits filed by various states, cities, and counties. In its first state settlement, JUUL agreed to pay $40 million to North Carolina and ceased marketing efforts targeting individuals under the age of 21.


Hodgson stated, "There was a time when nicotine use among teenagers was rapidly decreasing. Then, when e-cigarettes were initially introduced as a smoking cessation device, the use of nicotine-containing products among teenagers skyrocketed once again.


She presented information from the New England Journal of Medicine and the New York Times, which indicated that from 2017 to 2019, the proportion of teenagers attempting to use nicotine products more than doubled. This growth was seen in eighth, tenth, and twelfth grades, with one in four high school students reporting that they had tried vaping.


Hodson stated that JUUL targeted teenagers through advertisements in magazines, on television networks, and even educational websites. They also created products with flavors that appeal to children.


Hodson stated, "They've made a lot of money in the teenage market." He referenced a report from Forbes which revealed that JUUL's sales grew by 700% in 2016 and nearly doubled in 2019.


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the sale of JUUL e-cigarettes in June, but two weeks later, it suspended the order.


Hodson said that e-cigarettes, which are small in size and easy to conceal, have posed a disciplinary challenge to schools, whereby administrators must spend time dealing with violations. Additionally, she stated that due to students disposing of the e-cigarettes in toilets to avoid being caught, it has caused physical damage to the school's plumbing system.


The Pittsburgh school system is set to join the Wake County public school system, with other schools being represented by the Greensboro-based law firm Wood, Blankenbaker and Hooven. Superintendent Hodson stated that the risk of participating in the lawsuit is minimal, as the company representing them will not receive compensation if the claim is not successful. She added that any funds obtained through a settlement would go towards education, prevention, and anti-smoking efforts.


Sheriff Ethan Renck stated that he anticipates more regions to join the lawsuit.


I have spoken with the school principal," he said. "What they are seeing at the school is a real challenge. It is both a physical challenge and an educational challenge.


Kaiden stated that education requires not only students but also parents. In some cases, parents might provide smoking devices to underage students.


She said, "We need to have a conversation with the School Resource Officer (SRO) and parents, letting them know that they can be sued. We have had numerous parents ask us for e-cigarettes because they believe they are expensive. I don't think parents understand the impact these things could have on our students.


District 8 representative Melinda Fagundus, who is also a practicing nurse, has expressed agreement.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information, intended for industry professionals to exchange and study.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is intended solely for industry exchanges and research.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, this article may not accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on all domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign related statements and positions.


Copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.


This is a serious issue," she said. "The lawsuit will help raise awareness. It's not a safe thing. It may not smell like cigarette smoke, but that doesn't mean it won't harm your lungs.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18
Product | JT Launches Three Autumn-Limited Ploom Tobacco Sticks in Japan Across EVO, MEVIUS and CAMEL Brands
Product | JT Launches Three Autumn-Limited Ploom Tobacco Sticks in Japan Across EVO, MEVIUS and CAMEL Brands
Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT) launched three limited-edition autumn tobacco sticks for its Ploom heated tobacco devices in Japan on October 16, 2026, under the EVO, MEVIUS and CAMEL brands. All three are regular tobacco variants with seasonal packaging. Each pack contains 20 sticks, priced at ¥620, ¥590 and ¥570, respectively, including tax. The products are compatible with all Ploom devices and are sold in limited quantities exclusively through the CLUB JT online store while supplies last.
product
Oct.20
NAS 2026 | Cliff Douglas: Risk Continuum Should Play a Central Role in Tobacco Policy
NAS 2026 | Cliff Douglas: Risk Continuum Should Play a Central Role in Tobacco Policy
Cliff Douglas, a veteran U.S. tobacco-control and public health policy figure, told NAS 2026 that the “continuum of risk” should play a central role in tobacco policy. He called for clearer market pathways, stronger risk communication, differentiated regulation and enforcement, and said possible FDA reforms to PMTA reviews could be a “welcome correction” if they create a more efficient, predictable route for scientifically substantiated lower-risk products. Read 2Firsts’ on-site coverage.
Sep.26
HG Innovation, linked to IMiracle and ELFBAR, wins China patent for 6-methylnicotine salts covering vaping and oral products
HG Innovation, linked to IMiracle and ELFBAR, wins China patent for 6-methylnicotine salts covering vaping and oral products
HG Innovation Limited has been granted a Chinese invention patent covering 6-methylnicotine salt formulations and their use in oral and vaping products. The technology forms salts between 6-methylnicotine and alicyclic carboxylic acids, with granted claims extending to oral products, atomization substrates and electronic atomization devices. Applicant-generated tests reported differences in oxidation stability, in-vitro cytotoxicity and aerosol heavy-metal performance compared with selected benzoate or lactate controls. HG Innovation is directly linked to the broader IMiracle and ELFBAR business network.
Sep.04
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
A federal judge in Texas on Oct. 8 granted a joint request by the FDA and plaintiffs including Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY to stay litigation challenging the agency's 2021 PMTA rule. The court cited FDA's anticipated rulemaking concerning the regulation at issue. FDA announced on Sept. 28 that it intends to reassess the PMTA framework and could initiate new rulemaking to replace it. The parties must file a joint status report within 45 days and every 45 days thereafter. A motion by three Reynolds American companies to intervene remains pending.
Regulations
Oct.10
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18