Indonesian Advertising Council Opposes Government Tobacco Ad Ban

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.28.2024
Indonesian Advertising Council Opposes Government Tobacco Ad Ban
Opposition to Indonesian government's tobacco advertising ban law is voiced by Advertising Council DPI on May 28th.

According to Indonesian media KOMPAS on May 28, the Indonesian Advertising Council (DPI) has expressed opposition to the government's proposed health bill (RPP) that bans advertising, promotion, and sponsorship of tobacco products including cigarettes. This bill is based on Health Law No. 17 of 2023.

 

M Rafiq, the chairman of the Indonesian Public Health Association (DPI), has expressed his desire to participate in discussions regarding the draft law with the National Palace and Ministry of Health, but the government has not responded to his request. Rafiq stated at a press conference in southern Jakarta that he hopes Indonesian President Joko Widodo can review the part of the health law that prohibits the advertising, promotion, and sponsorship of tobacco products.

 

He also stated that he does not want the government to implement this regulation without the involvement of representatives from the advertising and creative industry in DPI. He warned that if this controversial plan is put into effect, it could hinder the development of the creative industry, especially under the strong commitments of President Prabowo and Vice President Gibran.

 

Rafiq emphasized that cigarette advertising has been regulated in various provisions, including the Broadcasting Act No. 32 of 2002 and the broadcasting behavior guidelines and program standards set by the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI). Additionally, Government Regulation No. 109 of 2012 ensures that manufacturers' communication is targeted only at adult consumers (18 years and older).

 

He called for attention to the development of the creative industry, emphasizing that they strictly adhere to all regulations and laws, including the Indonesian Advertising Ethics (EPI). Rafiq warned that before the COVID-19 pandemic, the creative industry had one million employees, but after the pandemic there were only 750,000 remaining. If regulations prohibiting tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship are implemented, the number of tech workers may further decrease.

 

He also expressed that if the health bill is passed, the television industry would lose approximately 9 trillion Indonesian rupiahs in revenue each year due to the inability to collaborate with cigarette companies. He added that the broadcasting industry would also lose a significant portion of the advertising market, and partners of the Indonesian Digital Association and Indonesian advertising companies would also be affected.

 

The government is currently discussing the drafting of a health bill (RPP Health) or subordinate regulations in accordance with the detailed provisions of Health Law No. 17 of 2023 (UU). It is understood that the bill will include some provisions to control tobacco production, sale, and sponsorship. However, this may pose a threat to the tobacco industry (IHT). At the end of last year, the Indonesian Ministry of Economic Affairs stated that the drafting of the Health Law (RPP Kesehatan) is still under discussion, especially regarding the management of addictive substances, where a specific agreement has not yet been reached.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Major U.S.  Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
Major U.S. Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
New York vape distributor Ecto World, which operates as Demand Vape, hired political consultant Roger Stone to lobby the Executive Office of the President on regulation of vaping and related products while facing state enforcement and multiple lawsuits. Public lobbying disclosures show that Ecto World paid at least $300,000 for the work through June 30, 2026. Separately, New York State announced in March that more than 28,500 pounds of vaping products tied to the company had been seized, while New York City and the state have pursued legal or enforcement actions. Public records do not show that the lobbying directly changed any specific regulatory or enforcement outcome.
Sep.08
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
Cochrane 2026 Update Adds Nine Trials, Keeps High-Certainty Finding That Nicotine E-Cigarettes Improve Quit Rates Over NRT
Cochrane 2026 Update Adds Nine Trials, Keeps High-Certainty Finding That Nicotine E-Cigarettes Improve Quit Rates Over NRT
Cochrane’s 2026 update of its living review on electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation included 80 randomized controlled trials involving 29,861 adult smokers, with nine trials added in this update. The review retained its high-certainty conclusion that nicotine e-cigarettes increase smoking cessation rates compared with nicotine replacement therapy. In absolute terms, about 10 in 100 people using nicotine e-cigarettes may quit smoking for at least six months, compared with about 6 in 100 using NRT. The review found no clear difference in serious adverse event rates between the two groups, while longer-term safety and the relative effectiveness of newer device types remain less certain.
Sep.07
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
The Philippines’ Bureau of Internal Revenue is intensifying enforcement against illicit vape and tobacco products ahead of the Christmas shopping season, directing regional and enforcement offices to strengthen monitoring of production sites, warehouses, distribution channels and retail outlets. The BIR destroyed 240,550 illicit vape products in August with an estimated tax liability of about PHP1.53 billion. A nationwide tax-compliance operation in July also inspected 3,590 businesses involved in tobacco and vapor products.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Law Survives Court Challenge From Nova Distro and Others Amid Similar Rulings Across States
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Law Survives Court Challenge From Nova Distro and Others Amid Similar Rulings Across States
A U.S. federal court upheld Pennsylvania's vape directory law on October 14, rejecting a challenge brought by Nova Distro, 101 Distributors and companies operating Tobacco Hut retail stores. Court records show that vaping accounts for about 60% of Tobacco Hut's profits and that the chain held approximately $2 million in inventory potentially subject to seizure under the law as of June 2. Pennsylvania began enforcement on October 19. The ruling follows similar appellate decisions in other states, even as new research shows that unlisted vaping products continue to account for substantial sales in states with established directories.
Regulations
Oct.22