Major Indonesian Tobacco Industry Groups Urge Government to Revise Regulations

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.21.2024
Major Indonesian Tobacco Industry Groups Urge Government to Revise Regulations
Indonesian tobacco industry groups urge government to separate tobacco regulations from health bill, citing excessive restrictions and economic impact.

According to AntaraNews on May 20th, major stakeholders in Indonesia's tobacco industry: the Indonesian Cigar Association (GAPPRI), the Indonesian Retailers Association (APRINDO), and the Federation of Indonesian Tobacco, Food, Beverage Trade Union (FSP RTMM-SPSI) are collectively urging the government to separate tobacco-related regulations from the health bill. They believe that the current regulations are too strict and have severely damaged the legal tobacco industry in terms of production and profits.

 

GAPPRI President Henry Najoan stated that due to excessive regulatory pressure, tobacco tax revenue in 2023 was lower than expected, leading to several years of financial difficulty for the tobacco industry. He also criticized the current proposal, stating that it would have a negative impact on the tobacco industry, as excessive bans and restrictions would force GAPPRI members to close down.

 

Najioan stated that currently, there are at least 446 regulations controlling and restricting the tobacco industry, including 400 control and regulation regulations, accounting for 89.68%; 41 tobacco tax regulations, accounting for 9.19%; and only 5 regulations controlling economic and welfare issues, accounting for 1.12%. They hope to have more detailed divisions in the sales regulations for traditional tobacco and e-cigarettes.

 

The president of APRINDO, Roy Nicholas Mandey, stated that while they do acknowledge the need for regulating tobacco consumption from a health perspective, bans and restrictions on the sale of tobacco products need to be thoroughly discussed, as these decisions will impact economic benefits and employment resources.

 

Sudarto, Chairman of FSP RTMM-SPSI, expressed concerns that the restrictions on tobacco products outlined in the health bill could directly impact the tobacco industry production and potentially lead to unemployment among workers in the industry. He stated that currently approximately 142,688 workers are employed in the tobacco sector, and the health bill could potentially result in the circulation of illegal tobacco products, affecting the economic livelihood of these workers.

 

The government is currently in the process of drafting regulations derived from Law No. 17/2023 related to health, in the form of regulations concerning the protection of the health RPP of addictive substances.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Special Report | Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Launch Fresh Push to Rein in Vaping
Special Report | Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Launch Fresh Push to Rein in Vaping
Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are tightening vape regulation through different tools, from Ukraine’s stronger enforcement push and Belarus’s proposed advertising restrictions to Russia’s new GOST standard and regional sales-ban mechanism. As black-market concerns persist, some Russian experts argue that China’s tightly controlled but legalised model — built around licensing, traceability and taxation — may offer a more effective alternative to blanket prohibition.
Jul.15
France Vape Market 2026: Use Reaches 7.9% Amid Tax, Regulatory and Scientific Debate
France Vape Market 2026: Use Reaches 7.9% Amid Tax, Regulatory and Scientific Debate
France remains one of Europe’s active vape markets in 2026, with adult vaping prevalence rising to 7.9%; at the same time, e-liquid taxation, public-space restrictions, advertising compliance and health-risk debate are pushing the industry into a critical policy period.
Jun.23
South Korea Brings Synthetic-Nicotine E-Cigarettes Under Tobacco Rules From June 24, Targeting Online Sales and Evasion
South Korea Brings Synthetic-Nicotine E-Cigarettes Under Tobacco Rules From June 24, Targeting Online Sales and Evasion
South Korea began full enforcement of tobacco-style rules for synthetic-nicotine e-cigarettes on June 24, 2026, with fines of up to 100,000 won for use in non-smoking areas and enforcement focus on online sales, raw nicotine liquids and products falsely marketed as nicotine-free.
MarketNews
Jun.25 by 2Firsts Perspectives
China Tobacco International HK Warns First-Half Revenue May Fall 25%-30%, Tobacco Leaf and Duty-Free Exposure Highlight Reliance on Traditional Tobacco
China Tobacco International HK Warns First-Half Revenue May Fall 25%-30%, Tobacco Leaf and Duty-Free Exposure Highlight Reliance on Traditional Tobacco
CTIHK expects first-half 2026 revenue to fall 25%-30%, mainly due to lower tobacco leaf imports and delayed cigarette shipments to China’s domestic duty-free market. Its 2025 revenue mix—nearly 90% from tobacco leaf-related businesses and less than 1% from new tobacco products—shows continued exposure to traditional supply chains and trade variables.
Jun.18
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Deputy Director Edgar Domenech has warned that some Chinese vape companies may be using 6-methyl nicotine, a nicotine analogue, raising new questions over how US regulators should classify emerging nicotine compounds.
Jul.13
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
A consumer survey by Japanese heated tobacco information platform RELAZO found that rising tobacco prices and planned heated tobacco tax changes may influence smoking decisions among Japanese consumers. The survey covered 49,879 men and women aged 20 to 69 nationwide. It found that around 40% of respondents cumulatively indicated they may consider quitting when a pack reaches ¥600 (approximately US$4.1), while nearly 90% expressed potential quitting intentions at a ¥1,000 (approximately US$6.8) price level. The survey also found significant differences by income level, with lower-income respondents showing greater sensitivity to price increases.
Jul.24