Malaysian e-cigarette industry requests suspension of new regulations

Sep.24.2024
Malaysian e-cigarette industry requests suspension of new regulations
Malaysia's e-cigarette industry calls for a halt to new regulations under the Public Health Control Act 2024. (19 words)

According to Malaymail's report on September 23, local e-cigarette industry practitioners in Malaysia are calling on the government to temporarily suspend and reevaluate a series of new regulations under the Public Health (Control of Tobacco Products) Amendment Act 2024, stating that these regulations could potentially cripple the industry.


This legislation was announced on February 2nd of this year, with plans for it to take effect next month (October).


Datuk Adzwan Manas, chairman of the Malaysia Retail E-Cigarette Association (MRECA), stated that the Ministry of Health implemented new regulations at the last minute, following only one briefing session, leaving industry professionals with insufficient time to prepare for the transition.


Azwan mentioned that the new regulations include banning the display of e-cigarette products at store counters, reducing the maximum capacity of disposable e-cigarette liquid to 3 milliliters, and decreasing bottled e-cigarette liquid to 15 milliliters. However, the current market generally offers e-cigarette liquid capacities between 30 milliliters to 60 milliliters. He believes that the reduction should be gradual every two years rather than a significant decrease to 15 milliliters for disposables.


The Ministry of Health did not give all suppliers, manufacturers, and entrepreneurs enough time to complete their products. What are the manufacturers who are still producing products that may take another one or two months to complete, or those who have already ordered raw materials, supposed to do?


In addition, Azwan pointed out that the Ministry of Health has also requested for the gradual phase-out of existing stock within six months, but the industry needs at least a year to complete this process. The registration fee for each e-cigarette product is 5000 ringgit (approximately 1200 US dollars), which is significantly high as they have already paid a lot for Sirim certification and other regulatory requirements.


At a press conference following the submission of a memorandum to the Prime Minister's office, Azwan stated that a recent survey showed that most e-cigarette companies are willing to pay a registration fee of 500 to 900 Malaysian ringgit (120 to 215 USD) per product.


The memorandum was signed by five associations, namely MRECA, the Malaysian E-Cigarette and Tobacco Alternatives Association (MEVTA), the Malaysian E-Cigarette Industry Advocacy Group, the Malaysian E-Cigarette Traders Association and the Malaysian E-Cigarette Chamber of Commerce, collectively representing over 2000 e-cigarette traders.


Azwan stated that, given that the e-cigarette industry is also an important source of revenue for the country, these groups are still pushing for negotiations with the Ministry of Finance led by the Prime Minister. The e-cigarette industry also supports displaying products behind the counter, rather than the government's proposed total display ban, which would affect their business.


We have always supported regulation of the e-cigarette industry, but we hope it can be implemented gradually. Do not push us to the brink of collapse with stringent regulations at the last minute.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Products Administration have issued a joint notice targeting illegal production and sales of vape products disguised as medical devices. The notice identifies six categories of violations, including obtaining medical licenses through false materials, misusing medical device credentials, expanding production beyond approved scopes, and using medical device-related online platforms to promote or sell vape products. The action is based on China’s tobacco and medical device regulations and aims to strengthen vape oversight and consumer protection.
Aug.04
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
According to Swiss media outlet Blick, local authorities are strengthening compliance checks on vape products, nicotine pouches and other tobacco-related products following the implementation of Switzerland’s revised Tobacco Products Act. A Basel laboratory tested 32 disposable vapes and e-liquids, with only three meeting regulatory requirements and 21 products banned from sale. Swiss authorities are also expanding retail inspections, laboratory testing and youth purchase checks to enforce the new tobacco and nicotine product rules.
Aug.12
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
BREAKING | China’s Tobacco Regulator Summons iMiracle Over Suspected Compliance Breaches
BREAKING | China’s Tobacco Regulator Summons iMiracle Over Suspected Compliance Breaches
Based on public records reviewed by 2Firsts, this is the first time China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has publicly announced regulatory talks with an e-cigarette company.
Jul.29
China Discloses First Criminal Case Over Counterfeit Vapes Disguised as “Medical Nebulizers” and “Zero-Nicotine” Products
China Discloses First Criminal Case Over Counterfeit Vapes Disguised as “Medical Nebulizers” and “Zero-Nicotine” Products
Chinese authorities have disclosed the country’s first reported criminal case involving counterfeit vapes marketed as “medical nebulizers” and “zero-nicotine” products. Authorities determined that the products involved were counterfeit vapes and pursued criminal charges for producing and selling counterfeit goods. According to the report, the case resulted in the seizure of 347,000 counterfeit vape pods and 53,700 vape devices, with physical goods valued at 22.13 million yuan.
Aug.04
 $20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
$20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
An Illinois court ordered three companies tied to Posh vapes to pay $20 million and permanently restricted the sale, marketing and distribution in Illinois of products lacking required FDA authorization. The consent order also imposes downstream distributor controls, age-verification measures and social-media marketing limits, creating a new state-level compliance benchmark for disposable vape businesses.
Regulations
Aug.05