Malaysia's E-cigarette Legalization Still in Question

Aug.09.2022
Malaysia's E-cigarette Legalization Still in Question
The legalization of e-cigarettes sales in Malaysia faces challenges as the proposed "Generation End" anti-smoking bill is under review.

The main advocacy organization in the region, MOVE (Malaysia Vape Entity), has stated that the legalization of electronic cigarette sales in Malaysia still faces challenges, following unexpected turns prior to the Parliamentary elections.


Samsul Kamal Ariffin, the CEO of MOVE, has announced that the proposed "end intergenerational smoking" bill has been referred to a special committee in parliament for further scrutiny, which he considers to be positive news.


We are concerned that electronic cigarettes will be included in this anti-smoking bill, which will result in strict regulations and criminalization of consumers and retailers. Members of the specialized committee now have the opportunity to remove electronic cigarettes and non-combustible products from the legislation and treat them as tools for harm reduction in a completely different manner," said Mr. Alifin.


The date for Malaysia's general election is yet to be confirmed. However, if the next parliamentary session is held earlier, a select committee will take action to prepare a statement on its proposed amendments. MOVE will have a representative serving as a member of this special committee.


Similar to current legislation in New Zealand, Malaysia's proposed "intergenerational end" bill seeks to ban the sale of cigarettes and tobacco products to anyone born after 2007. However, unlike New Zealand, Malaysia's Health Minister also suggests adding electronic cigarette products to the intergenerational ban.


If Malaysia aims to reduce its overall smoking rate to below 5% by 2040, a ban on electronic cigarettes would not be able to achieve that goal. New Zealand has a smoking rate that is less than half of ours because they have become increasingly strict on smoking while only regulating the retail channels of adult e-cigarette products. New Zealand will likely achieve a smoke-free status at least a generation earlier than us because their approach to smoking and e-cigarette use is vastly different. If we want to save lives, Malaysia must do the same," he said.


In April, advocates for tobacco harm reduction (THR) were encouraged when regulations for electronic cigarette devices were announced to take effect on August 3rd. They had been lobbying for this to happen before the legalization of electronic cigarette sales, as have other THR supporters for many years.


We were concerned when the Health Minister proposed the "legacy of generations" bill on August 2nd and intended to pass it before parliament adjourned. Fortunately, enough members of parliament fought back, and the select committee or the next parliament can now regulate e-cigarettes through separate legislation. This is what needs to happen, and I believe it will.


As evidenced by 70 countries, the THR method is effective. Banning e-cigarettes will only harm smokers. Regulating e-cigarettes will provide a viable and less harmful alternative for smokers, not to mention much-needed tax revenue for Malaysia," said Mr. Alifin.


For the past decade, it has been a black market for electronic cigarette users in Malaysia, with unapproved products being untaxed and no safety guarantees for local consumers regarding product standards.


According to Mr. Alifin, providing a feasible, safe, and legal way for the 21% of Malaysians who smoke to improve their health and well-being is crucial. Electronic cigarettes are believed to be 95% less harmful than combustible tobacco. Making safer nicotine products legally available is the only way to significantly reduce Malaysia's unnecessary high smoking rates and save tens of thousands of lives each year.


The Asia Pacific Advocates for Tobacco Harm Reduction Alliance (CAPHRA) has endorsed the legalization and regulation of e-cigarette sales in Malaysia, believing it will lead to a significant reduction in smoking rates.


MOVE continues to work with political figures and health officials in Malaysia to provide them with necessary information and support to effectively tackle the country's smoking epidemic. CAPHRA believes that the unsuccessful ban on e-cigarettes in Malaysia will be lifted in the next few months and there will be no turning back, said Nancy Lucas, CAPHRA's Executive Coordinator.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS. 2FIRSTS also cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content of the article. The compilation of this article is solely for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation proficiency, the translated article may not fully capture the original author's intended meaning. Therefore, please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS aligns completely with the stance and position of the Chinese government on any domestic, cross-strait, or foreign related issues.


The compilation of information is owned by the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
China’s HTP Exports Fell 14.3% in H1 2026 as Russia and Belarus Accounted for 76% Lead
China’s HTP Exports Fell 14.3% in H1 2026 as Russia and Belarus Accounted for 76% Lead
In H1 2026, China’s HS 24041100 exports stood at $1.32 million, down 14.3% YoY, with volume falling 17.2% to 55.33 tons. Market distribution shifted drastically amid overall export drops. Exports to Russia and Belarus totaled $1 million, taking 76.0% of all shipments versus 29.5% in H1 2025. Belarus became the top destination with export value jumping 177.5%, while the Philippines, Singapore and Indonesia’s combined share slumped from 49.3% to 11.2%.Domestically, Yunnan led exporter registrations; Jiangsu and Shanghai were key suppliers, yet Anhui and Sichuan had no exports. Heavy concentration means order or declaration changes for Russia/Belarus greatly affect national aggregate data. The data shows customs entry points (not end markets), covering tobacco consumables only, excluding heating equipment and the complete HTP supply chain.
Aug.11
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28
India Steps Up Nicotine Pouch Enforcement as ZYN, White Fox Circulate and Drug Panel Urges Halt to New Nicotine Formulations
India Steps Up Nicotine Pouch Enforcement as ZYN, White Fox Circulate and Drug Panel Urges Halt to New Nicotine Formulations
India's Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has directed states to step up enforcement against nicotine pouch sales, citing increased availability through online and offline channels and concern about nicotine exposure among children. Reuters reported that international brands including ZYN and White Fox are being sold in India. A study led by ICMR-NICPR found pouches in seven of 10 surveyed locations and identified 68 brands and 445 flavors online. Separately, India's Drugs Technical Advisory Board recommended in August that no new nicotine formulation be approved.
Regulations
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14