Massive Smuggling Bust by Philippine Customs Authorities in Manila

Sep.10.2024
Massive Smuggling Bust by Philippine Customs Authorities in Manila
Philippine Customs seizes $84.9 million worth of suspected smuggled goods in Manila raid, marking one of largest operations this year.

According to the Philippine government news site, the Philippine News Agency (PNA), on September 9th, the Bureau of Customs (BOC) recently seized a suspected smuggled shipment worth approximately 4.8 billion Philippine pesos (around 84.9 million US dollars) in a raid in Manila.


Bienvenido Rubio, Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs (BOC), announced during a press conference on Monday (9th) that the Customs Intelligence and Investigation Service of the Manila International Container Port (CIIS-MICP) conducted a raid on a warehouse in Binondo on September 6th. The raid resulted in the seizure of smuggled e-cigarettes, counterfeit branded goods, cosmetics, and household items, including e-cigarette products labeled with the brand "AKSO.


I am confident that this will be one of the biggest operations of the year for our customs bureau, with the items discovered being of significant value. In recent years, we have been monitoring multiple warehouses to prevent intellectual property infringement. As these groups and individuals become more brazen in their evasion of the law, our customs officers will spare no effort in tracking them down and prosecuting them from top to bottom.


BOC-CIIS supervisor Verne Enciso added that multiple counterfeit items with brand logos were found on several floors of the warehouse.


The customs bureau temporarily closed the warehouse storage area, waiting for designated customs inspectors to conduct a final inventory of the items. At the same time, the owners and operators of the warehouse received a notification, and within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter, they are required to submit proof that these imported goods are legally imported and have paid the correct customs duties and taxes in accordance with the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act (CMTA) Section 224.


If the appropriate documents cannot be provided, the owners and operators of the warehouse may be held accountable for violating Section 117 (Regulated Imports and Exports) and Section 1400 (False Declaration of Goods) of the CMTA, as well as regulations related to Section 1113 (Seizure and Forfeiture of Property). Additionally, they may also face charges under the Philippine Intellectual Property Code (Republic Act No. 8293) and the Tax Reform Acceleration and Inclusion Act (Republic Act No. 10963).


In addition, the Philippine Bureau of Customs (MICP) and the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) were also involved in this operation.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products have received Marketing Granted Orders (MGO) through the PMTA pathway. The authorizations were completed under the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot program in “record time,” with the FDA citing lower levels of harmful constituents while stressing that the decision applies only to the specified products and does not mean they are safe or FDA approved.
Regulations
Dec.20
Michigan Senate Passes Bipartisan Bills Requiring Tobacco Retailer Licensing
Michigan Senate Passes Bipartisan Bills Requiring Tobacco Retailer Licensing
The Michigan Senate has passed bipartisan legislation requiring tobacco retailers to be licensed statewide, aiming to strengthen enforcement against youth tobacco use. The bills introduce regular inspections, tougher penalties for sales to minors, regulation of online and delivery sales, and a ban on flash sales. The legislation now moves to the Michigan House for further consideration.
Dec.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thai Customs Region 2 seizes 22,800 YOOZ-branded vape pod heads
Thai Customs Region 2 seizes 22,800 YOOZ-branded vape pod heads
Thailand’s Customs Region 2 searched a private logistics company in Mukdahan province and seized 22,800 vape pod heads with no evidence of customs clearance. The seized items weighed 389.50 kg in total and were valued at more than THB 4.5 million (about USD 143,581.90). The photo shows packaging marked “YOOZ”.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Alan Zhao: In the Post-“Absolute Resolve” Era: Speculating on U.S.-Referenced Regulatory Alignment and the Restructuring of Order in South America’s Novel Tobacco Market
Alan Zhao: In the Post-“Absolute Resolve” Era: Speculating on U.S.-Referenced Regulatory Alignment and the Restructuring of Order in South America’s Novel Tobacco Market
Alan Zhao analyzes post-Operation Absolute Resolve geopolitics and the rise of “U.S.-referenced regulatory alignment” in South America’s novel tobacco market as U.S. influence grows. Using regulatory reliance, digitalized enforcement, and industrial shifts, he assesses how rule redesign may alter market access, competition, and supply chains, asking how firms can find durable certainty as order is rewritten.
Jan.06 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Guam checks 277 eligible retailers in 2025; eight found selling tobacco or disposable vapes to minors aged 16–20
Guam checks 277 eligible retailers in 2025; eight found selling tobacco or disposable vapes to minors aged 16–20
he Guam Behavioral Health and Wellness Center said that out of 277 eligible tobacco retailers inspected in 2025, eight were found selling tobacco or disposable e-cigarettes or vapes to minors aged 16–20, and one retailer failed to display the required “No Sale Under 21” prohibition sign.
Jan.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai