Non-smokers in Australia Calls for Stricter Smoking Regulations on Private Properties

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.10.2024
Non-smokers in Australia Calls for Stricter Smoking Regulations on Private Properties
Non-smokers in Australia are calling for stricter controls on smoking on private properties after a crackdown on e-cigarettes.

According to recent reports by Australian media outlet Perthnow, non-smokers are calling for stricter controls on smoking in private properties, amidst the national crackdown on illegal smoking devices and e-cigarettes.

 

As of January 1st, the federal government has implemented new measures to crack down on the import of disposable vaping devices. The regulations surrounding cigarette smoking, however, remain a separate system, despite hefty taxation in the market, cigarettes can still be readily purchased at any time.

 

According to reports, Perth resident Maggie Snell and thousands of petitioners are strongly advocating for a change to increase measures for protecting others. Ms. Snell claims that the inadequacy of protection for non-smokers is a public health issue that officials should take responsibility for addressing.

 

Maggie Snell, a local resident living in Basington, has been significantly affected in her life due to her asthma, and she claims that her condition has worsened since her new neighbor began smoking near their shared property boundary. According to Snell, she has been relying on medication, including steroids, to alleviate her asthma symptoms.

 

Doctors have been unable to comprehend why we couldn't control the asthma until our neighbor left for approximately three weeks," she said. "During those three weeks, I didn't have any asthma." Mrs. Snell has since retired, and she stated that the secondhand smoke coming through the boundary walls made it difficult for her to breathe.

 

I cannot breathe indoors and I cannot escape the smoke," she said. "Unless we can prevent our neighbors from smoking there, I will die from emphysema, as all studies clearly indicate that I will develop heart disease." Ms. Snell stated that current regulations prevent her from fighting back, constituting a permanent reliance on medication and steroids to alleviate her breathing difficulties.

 

She hopes to see government intervention and regulations on smoking in private properties - ideally limited to only areas that are at least 10 meters away from any neighboring properties or boundary lines including windows, entrances, or ventilation openings. She argues that on any property that cannot meet this requirement, smoking should be restricted to enclosed spaces.

 

Snell's petition, launched in September last year, has received over 2000 signatures. Caitlin Kameron, Senior Coordinator for Policy and Research at the Western Australian Cancer Council, who is spearheading the anti-smoking campaign, stated that exposure to tobacco smoke is a known cause of asthma and wheezing.

 

Cameron also noted that many complaints about the spread of secondhand smoke in private properties primarily occur in properties with individual ownership, such as apartment buildings and offices. The Cancer Council strongly supports smoke-free regulations to reduce secondhand smoke exposure in high-density residential areas. However, these proposals were not included in the 2020 property ownership regulations in Western Australia.

 

Secondhand smoke exposure has no safe level," she said. "The Cancer Council has strongly advocated for the adoption of smoke-free model regulations to reduce secondhand smoke exposure." In October 2022, a department in New South Wales defined smoke dispersion inside residential apartment buildings as a hazard, after hearing witness testimonies and medical documents from citizens and administrative departments, ultimately banning neighbors from smoking tobacco products on balconies.

 

According to a spokesperson from the Department of Health in Western Australia, there are currently no legal restrictions on smoking in private residences across Australia. However, individual strata companies have the power to implement regulations to prevent smoking. "Individuals experiencing smoke drift may wish to seek independent legal advice on this matter," they said. "If they live in a strata-titled property, they can raise this issue with their strata company or strata committee.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Product | HQD launches the new HQD GO in the U.S., featuring three power levels and a ~$30 price tag.
Product | HQD launches the new HQD GO in the U.S., featuring three power levels and a ~$30 price tag.
HQD has listed the disposable HQD GO on its official site and U.S. channels. The device touts 35,000 puffs, three power levels with adjustable airflow, and a 30 mg/ml nicotine strength. On U.S. retail websites, it’s priced at about $29.99.
Oct.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ireland Taoiseach Calls for Phasing Out Vapes as Cabinet Considers Ban on Single-Use Devices
Ireland Taoiseach Calls for Phasing Out Vapes as Cabinet Considers Ban on Single-Use Devices
Taoiseach Micheál Martin said Ireland should work toward eliminating the use of vapes over time, as the Cabinet meets to consider the Public Health (Single-Use Vapes) Bill 2025, proposed by Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill. The bill would ban the retail sale of single-use vapes six months after it becomes law.
Nov.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Complete Vape Prohibition Takes Effect Across Uzbekistan
Complete Vape Prohibition Takes Effect Across Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan has enacted a nationwide ban on the sale and circulation of e-cigarettes and related vape liquids, following the approval of a new law signed by President Shavkat Mirziyoyev. The legislation introduces criminal liability for violations, with penalties including fines of 300 to 500 basic calculation units (approximately US$10,300–17,200), corrective labor for up to three years, or imprisonment for up to five years.
Nov.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report | Anti-Vaping Campaign in the Baltics Goes Sideways
Special Report | Anti-Vaping Campaign in the Baltics Goes Sideways
2Firsts analyzes vaping regulations across the Baltic states. Following Latvia’s flavor ban, tax revenues fell and the black market expanded, while similar measures in Estonia and Lithuania have also failed to deliver results. The region’s anti-vaping policies are now triggering market imbalance and policy reassessment.
Oct.13
California Federal Judge Signals Likely Class Certification in Juul–Altria Antitrust Case
California Federal Judge Signals Likely Class Certification in Juul–Altria Antitrust Case
U.S. District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California indicated on Friday that he will likely certify classes of direct and indirect purchasers accusing e-cigarette makers Juul Labs Inc. and former rival Altria Group Inc. of conspiring to limit product variety and violate antitrust laws.
Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Italian anti-trust agency investigates PMI's marketing of smoke-free products, company denies wrongdoing
Italian anti-trust agency investigates PMI's marketing of smoke-free products, company denies wrongdoing
Italian anti-trust agency investigates Philip Morris International's promotion of smoke-free products, questioning potentially misleading language.
Oct.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai