Non-smokers in Australia Calls for Stricter Smoking Regulations on Private Properties

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.10.2024
Non-smokers in Australia Calls for Stricter Smoking Regulations on Private Properties
Non-smokers in Australia are calling for stricter controls on smoking on private properties after a crackdown on e-cigarettes.

According to recent reports by Australian media outlet Perthnow, non-smokers are calling for stricter controls on smoking in private properties, amidst the national crackdown on illegal smoking devices and e-cigarettes.

 

As of January 1st, the federal government has implemented new measures to crack down on the import of disposable vaping devices. The regulations surrounding cigarette smoking, however, remain a separate system, despite hefty taxation in the market, cigarettes can still be readily purchased at any time.

 

According to reports, Perth resident Maggie Snell and thousands of petitioners are strongly advocating for a change to increase measures for protecting others. Ms. Snell claims that the inadequacy of protection for non-smokers is a public health issue that officials should take responsibility for addressing.

 

Maggie Snell, a local resident living in Basington, has been significantly affected in her life due to her asthma, and she claims that her condition has worsened since her new neighbor began smoking near their shared property boundary. According to Snell, she has been relying on medication, including steroids, to alleviate her asthma symptoms.

 

Doctors have been unable to comprehend why we couldn't control the asthma until our neighbor left for approximately three weeks," she said. "During those three weeks, I didn't have any asthma." Mrs. Snell has since retired, and she stated that the secondhand smoke coming through the boundary walls made it difficult for her to breathe.

 

I cannot breathe indoors and I cannot escape the smoke," she said. "Unless we can prevent our neighbors from smoking there, I will die from emphysema, as all studies clearly indicate that I will develop heart disease." Ms. Snell stated that current regulations prevent her from fighting back, constituting a permanent reliance on medication and steroids to alleviate her breathing difficulties.

 

She hopes to see government intervention and regulations on smoking in private properties - ideally limited to only areas that are at least 10 meters away from any neighboring properties or boundary lines including windows, entrances, or ventilation openings. She argues that on any property that cannot meet this requirement, smoking should be restricted to enclosed spaces.

 

Snell's petition, launched in September last year, has received over 2000 signatures. Caitlin Kameron, Senior Coordinator for Policy and Research at the Western Australian Cancer Council, who is spearheading the anti-smoking campaign, stated that exposure to tobacco smoke is a known cause of asthma and wheezing.

 

Cameron also noted that many complaints about the spread of secondhand smoke in private properties primarily occur in properties with individual ownership, such as apartment buildings and offices. The Cancer Council strongly supports smoke-free regulations to reduce secondhand smoke exposure in high-density residential areas. However, these proposals were not included in the 2020 property ownership regulations in Western Australia.

 

Secondhand smoke exposure has no safe level," she said. "The Cancer Council has strongly advocated for the adoption of smoke-free model regulations to reduce secondhand smoke exposure." In October 2022, a department in New South Wales defined smoke dispersion inside residential apartment buildings as a hazard, after hearing witness testimonies and medical documents from citizens and administrative departments, ultimately banning neighbors from smoking tobacco products on balconies.

 

According to a spokesperson from the Department of Health in Western Australia, there are currently no legal restrictions on smoking in private residences across Australia. However, individual strata companies have the power to implement regulations to prevent smoking. "Individuals experiencing smoke drift may wish to seek independent legal advice on this matter," they said. "If they live in a strata-titled property, they can raise this issue with their strata company or strata committee.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

2Firsts On-Site | PMI Brings IQOS, ZYN, VEEV and Marlboro Together at Its “Boulevard” at InterTabac 2026
2Firsts On-Site | PMI Brings IQOS, ZYN, VEEV and Marlboro Together at Its “Boulevard” at InterTabac 2026
At InterTabac 2026 in Dortmund, PMI is presenting multiple brands and products along “The PMI Boulevard,” including IQOS, ZYN, VEEV and Marlboro. On-site images captured by 2Firsts show dedicated spaces including the IQOS Boutique, ZYN Café, PMI Gallery and Marlboro Office
Market
Sep.16 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Gallup Tracks Nicotine Pouch Use for the First Time: 11% of U.S. Adults Smoke, 9% Vape and 4% Use Nicotine Pouches
Gallup Tracks Nicotine Pouch Use for the First Time: 11% of U.S. Adults Smoke, 9% Vape and 4% Use Nicotine Pouches
Gallup’s 2026 Consumption Habits survey tracked nicotine pouch use for the first time. The survey found that 11% of U.S. adults reported smoking cigarettes in the past week, 9% reported vaping, and 4% reported using nicotine pouches. Cigarette smoking remained near Gallup’s long-term low, while adult vaping rates stayed relatively stable in recent years.
Market
Aug.25 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10
Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Holdings said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration notified the company on June 23, 2026, that 30 PACHA vape SKUs with submitted PMTAs had been tentatively identified for inclusion on a planned public-facing FDA webpage. Under enforcement guidance issued by FDA in May, the webpage is intended to identify certain unauthorized products for which the agency generally does not intend to prioritize enforcement of premarket authorization requirements. Charlie’s disclosed the development alongside second-quarter revenue of $3.8 million, up 116% year over year.
Aug.25
Product | HQD SiSA 80K Enters the U.S. Market With a Hookah-Inspired Approach to the High-Capacity Disposable Segment
Product | HQD SiSA 80K Enters the U.S. Market With a Hookah-Inspired Approach to the High-Capacity Disposable Segment
The HQD SiSA 80K Hookah Disposable Vape has appeared across U.S. and cross-border online retail channels. The device comes prefilled with 28ml of e-liquid, uses a 5% nicotine salt configuration and carries a brand claim of up to 80,000 puffs. Beyond puff count, the product differentiates itself through hookah-inspired features including adjustable airflow, a flowing-water sound effect and flavor options associated with traditional hookah consumption.
Aug.18
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21