Non-smokers in Australia Calls for Stricter Smoking Regulations on Private Properties

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.10.2024
Non-smokers in Australia Calls for Stricter Smoking Regulations on Private Properties
Non-smokers in Australia are calling for stricter controls on smoking on private properties after a crackdown on e-cigarettes.

According to recent reports by Australian media outlet Perthnow, non-smokers are calling for stricter controls on smoking in private properties, amidst the national crackdown on illegal smoking devices and e-cigarettes.

 

As of January 1st, the federal government has implemented new measures to crack down on the import of disposable vaping devices. The regulations surrounding cigarette smoking, however, remain a separate system, despite hefty taxation in the market, cigarettes can still be readily purchased at any time.

 

According to reports, Perth resident Maggie Snell and thousands of petitioners are strongly advocating for a change to increase measures for protecting others. Ms. Snell claims that the inadequacy of protection for non-smokers is a public health issue that officials should take responsibility for addressing.

 

Maggie Snell, a local resident living in Basington, has been significantly affected in her life due to her asthma, and she claims that her condition has worsened since her new neighbor began smoking near their shared property boundary. According to Snell, she has been relying on medication, including steroids, to alleviate her asthma symptoms.

 

Doctors have been unable to comprehend why we couldn't control the asthma until our neighbor left for approximately three weeks," she said. "During those three weeks, I didn't have any asthma." Mrs. Snell has since retired, and she stated that the secondhand smoke coming through the boundary walls made it difficult for her to breathe.

 

I cannot breathe indoors and I cannot escape the smoke," she said. "Unless we can prevent our neighbors from smoking there, I will die from emphysema, as all studies clearly indicate that I will develop heart disease." Ms. Snell stated that current regulations prevent her from fighting back, constituting a permanent reliance on medication and steroids to alleviate her breathing difficulties.

 

She hopes to see government intervention and regulations on smoking in private properties - ideally limited to only areas that are at least 10 meters away from any neighboring properties or boundary lines including windows, entrances, or ventilation openings. She argues that on any property that cannot meet this requirement, smoking should be restricted to enclosed spaces.

 

Snell's petition, launched in September last year, has received over 2000 signatures. Caitlin Kameron, Senior Coordinator for Policy and Research at the Western Australian Cancer Council, who is spearheading the anti-smoking campaign, stated that exposure to tobacco smoke is a known cause of asthma and wheezing.

 

Cameron also noted that many complaints about the spread of secondhand smoke in private properties primarily occur in properties with individual ownership, such as apartment buildings and offices. The Cancer Council strongly supports smoke-free regulations to reduce secondhand smoke exposure in high-density residential areas. However, these proposals were not included in the 2020 property ownership regulations in Western Australia.

 

Secondhand smoke exposure has no safe level," she said. "The Cancer Council has strongly advocated for the adoption of smoke-free model regulations to reduce secondhand smoke exposure." In October 2022, a department in New South Wales defined smoke dispersion inside residential apartment buildings as a hazard, after hearing witness testimonies and medical documents from citizens and administrative departments, ultimately banning neighbors from smoking tobacco products on balconies.

 

According to a spokesperson from the Department of Health in Western Australia, there are currently no legal restrictions on smoking in private residences across Australia. However, individual strata companies have the power to implement regulations to prevent smoking. "Individuals experiencing smoke drift may wish to seek independent legal advice on this matter," they said. "If they live in a strata-titled property, they can raise this issue with their strata company or strata committee.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
A Quebec Superior Court has allowed a class action lawsuit against Juul Labs and Altria Group related to vaping products to proceed, involving allegations concerning marketing practices, youth exposure and corporate responsibility. The ruling only allows the case to move forward and does not represent a finding that Juul or Altria are legally liable. The case highlights continued legal risks facing vape companies regarding product marketing, youth protection and corporate accountability.
Jul.28
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
According to recent LinkedIn posts from people at VAPORESSO, SMOORE and a German distribution partner, vape brand DOJO will begin rolling out a new global brand identity on September 1, 2026, led by a redesigned handwritten logo. The new visual system will be gradually applied across product packaging, marketing materials and digital assets over the following months. Fabio Corsaro, Head of Marketing and Purchasing at MG Wesel GmbH, said the rebrand was related to trademark issues, but that explanation has not been publicly confirmed by DOJO, VAPORESSO or SMOORE. DOJO is currently promoting its Blast X product in Germany.
Aug.31
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, an Altria Group company, has broken ground on an approximately $250 million manufacturing expansion in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. The roughly 270,000-square-foot facility is expected to create more than 200 jobs and absorb processing, manufacturing and packaging operations currently split between Hopkinsville and Nashville, Tennessee. USSTC previously said production at its Nashville facility is expected to wind down by early 2028. The project forms part of Altria’s broader effort to modernize and consolidate its U.S. smokeless tobacco manufacturing network.
Sep.10
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
According to Swiss media outlet Blick, local authorities are strengthening compliance checks on vape products, nicotine pouches and other tobacco-related products following the implementation of Switzerland’s revised Tobacco Products Act. A Basel laboratory tested 32 disposable vapes and e-liquids, with only three meeting regulatory requirements and 21 products banned from sale. Swiss authorities are also expanding retail inspections, laboratory testing and youth purchase checks to enforce the new tobacco and nicotine product rules.
Aug.12