Non-smokers in Australia Calls for Stricter Smoking Regulations on Private Properties

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.10.2024
Non-smokers in Australia Calls for Stricter Smoking Regulations on Private Properties
Non-smokers in Australia are calling for stricter controls on smoking on private properties after a crackdown on e-cigarettes.

According to recent reports by Australian media outlet Perthnow, non-smokers are calling for stricter controls on smoking in private properties, amidst the national crackdown on illegal smoking devices and e-cigarettes.

 

As of January 1st, the federal government has implemented new measures to crack down on the import of disposable vaping devices. The regulations surrounding cigarette smoking, however, remain a separate system, despite hefty taxation in the market, cigarettes can still be readily purchased at any time.

 

According to reports, Perth resident Maggie Snell and thousands of petitioners are strongly advocating for a change to increase measures for protecting others. Ms. Snell claims that the inadequacy of protection for non-smokers is a public health issue that officials should take responsibility for addressing.

 

Maggie Snell, a local resident living in Basington, has been significantly affected in her life due to her asthma, and she claims that her condition has worsened since her new neighbor began smoking near their shared property boundary. According to Snell, she has been relying on medication, including steroids, to alleviate her asthma symptoms.

 

Doctors have been unable to comprehend why we couldn't control the asthma until our neighbor left for approximately three weeks," she said. "During those three weeks, I didn't have any asthma." Mrs. Snell has since retired, and she stated that the secondhand smoke coming through the boundary walls made it difficult for her to breathe.

 

I cannot breathe indoors and I cannot escape the smoke," she said. "Unless we can prevent our neighbors from smoking there, I will die from emphysema, as all studies clearly indicate that I will develop heart disease." Ms. Snell stated that current regulations prevent her from fighting back, constituting a permanent reliance on medication and steroids to alleviate her breathing difficulties.

 

She hopes to see government intervention and regulations on smoking in private properties - ideally limited to only areas that are at least 10 meters away from any neighboring properties or boundary lines including windows, entrances, or ventilation openings. She argues that on any property that cannot meet this requirement, smoking should be restricted to enclosed spaces.

 

Snell's petition, launched in September last year, has received over 2000 signatures. Caitlin Kameron, Senior Coordinator for Policy and Research at the Western Australian Cancer Council, who is spearheading the anti-smoking campaign, stated that exposure to tobacco smoke is a known cause of asthma and wheezing.

 

Cameron also noted that many complaints about the spread of secondhand smoke in private properties primarily occur in properties with individual ownership, such as apartment buildings and offices. The Cancer Council strongly supports smoke-free regulations to reduce secondhand smoke exposure in high-density residential areas. However, these proposals were not included in the 2020 property ownership regulations in Western Australia.

 

Secondhand smoke exposure has no safe level," she said. "The Cancer Council has strongly advocated for the adoption of smoke-free model regulations to reduce secondhand smoke exposure." In October 2022, a department in New South Wales defined smoke dispersion inside residential apartment buildings as a hazard, after hearing witness testimonies and medical documents from citizens and administrative departments, ultimately banning neighbors from smoking tobacco products on balconies.

 

According to a spokesperson from the Department of Health in Western Australia, there are currently no legal restrictions on smoking in private residences across Australia. However, individual strata companies have the power to implement regulations to prevent smoking. "Individuals experiencing smoke drift may wish to seek independent legal advice on this matter," they said. "If they live in a strata-titled property, they can raise this issue with their strata company or strata committee.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Irish Government Approves Ban on Disposable Vapes and Tightens Nicotine Controls
Irish Government Approves Ban on Disposable Vapes and Tightens Nicotine Controls
Irish Government has approved the Public Health (Single Use Vapes) Bill 2025, which will outlaw the sale of disposable e-cigarettes and introduce tighter restrictions on other nicotine products such as pouches. The move follows Northern Ireland’s similar ban earlier in 2025 and aims to protect young people from nicotine addiction.
Nov.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMI Japan Upgrades IQOS ILUMA i One with New Button Layout, Aluminum Base
PMI Japan Upgrades IQOS ILUMA i One with New Button Layout, Aluminum Base
PMI Japan has refreshed its all-in-one heated tobacco device, IQOS ILUMA i One, with upgraded materials and exterior design. Sales begin October 29 via IQOS stores and the official website. The new model retains core features such as auto-start and continuous use, but is not compatible with accessories from the previous version.
Oct.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Poll Shows Britons Favor Regulation Over Bans on Nicotine Pouches
Poll Shows Britons Favor Regulation Over Bans on Nicotine Pouches
A new poll commissioned by We Vape UK reveals that most Britons favor regulation — not prohibition — of nicotine pouches. The survey shows broad public support for harm-reduction policies and frustration with weak government regulation, contrasting sharply with Ireland’s recent decision to ban disposable vapes and impose strict limits on nicotine products.
Nov.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Altria and NJOY Sue ITC, Claim Judge Appointment Process Is Unconstitutional
Altria and NJOY Sue ITC, Claim Judge Appointment Process Is Unconstitutional
Altria Group and its NJOY subsidiary have filed a lawsuit in Virginia federal court challenging the U.S. International Trade Commission’s process for appointing administrative law judges. The companies allege the system violates the U.S. Constitution and seek to halt an ITC patent investigation initiated by rival Juul.
Nov.10
Samsung's battery explosion case proceeds as court finds manufacturer maintained “sufficient contacts” with the state
Samsung's battery explosion case proceeds as court finds manufacturer maintained “sufficient contacts” with the state
The Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled that Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a South Korean battery manufacturer, is subject to Minnesota jurisdiction in a product-liability case involving a vape battery explosion. The court found the company had “sufficient minimum contacts” with the state through extensive business activity.
Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Chicago CBP Seizes $358,000 Worth of Illegal Vapes
U.S. Chicago CBP Seizes $358,000 Worth of Illegal Vapes
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers in Chicago seized 43,200 illicit vaping products valued at over $358,000 for violating the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The shipment originated from China and was destined for Mississippi.
Nov.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai