Ohio Court Allows Cities to Enforce Ban on Flavored Tobacco

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai

May.20.2024

Ohio Court Allows Cities to Enforce Ban on Flavored Tobacco

Ohio Judge Rules Statewide Flavor Ban Unconstitutional, Allowing 21 Cities to Enforce Ban on Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products.

According to a report from Halfwheel on May 17th, there has been an update after 18 months regarding the ban on flavored tobacco products in Ohio. Judge Mark Serrott ruled that the recently passed statewide preemption law is unconstitutional, allowing for the enforcement of bans on the sale of flavored tobacco products in 21 cities involved in the lawsuit.

The controversy began in December 2022, when the city council of Columbus, Ohio, as the main plaintiff in the lawsuit, passed a ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products. In response, the Republican-controlled Ohio Legislature, during a special session focused on other issues, quickly passed a preemptive measure aimed at preventing cities from implementing stricter bans than state law.

In January 2023, Governor Mike DeWine, a Republican, vetoed a bill that would have banned the sale of flavored e-cigarettes, citing his longstanding opposition to the measure. Due to technical issues, the state legislature was unable to override DeWine's veto.

Last year, the state legislature attempted to pass a preemptive clause once again and successfully overturned Governor DeWine's second veto. Subsequently, cities like Columbus began to sue, Judge Serothe issued a temporary injunction allowing Columbus's law to remain in effect and halting the implementation of the state law.

However, this issue remains unresolved. The state government has stated that it will appeal the ruling by Judge Serott to the Tenth Circuit Court. Cities not involved in this lawsuit are still bound by state law.

References:

[1] Ohio Judge Says Cities Can Ban Flavored Tobacco Products

Also Read:

[1] Ohio Judge Temporarily Blocks State Law Restricting Tobacco Sales

[2] Ohio Judge Issues Temporary Ban on State Tobacco Legislation

[3] Ohio City Lawsuit Challenges State Tobacco Sales Restrictions as Unconstitutional

#North America #United States #Traditional tobacco #Legislation #Flavored tobacco products

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Japan Tobacco launches limited-edition Ploom AURA color “Bronze Royal,” priced at about $27

Japan Tobacco (JT) announced that Ploom AURA has added a second limited-edition colorway, “Bronze Royal,” which will be available in limited quantities through official channels starting November 11, priced at approximately $27.3.

Nov.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Costa Rica Ruling Party Lawmaker Proposes Vape Ban as Experts Warn of Black Market Risks

A lawmaker from Costa Rica’s ruling party has introduced a bill to completely ban e-cigarettes and related products, covering their import, sale, use, and manufacturing, citing rising youth use and associated health risks. The proposal would repeal the current regulatory law and has raised concerns that a full ban, combined with weak enforcement, could fuel a black market.

Dec.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Wisconsin Lawmakers Revive Bill to Raise Legal Age for Tobacco and Vaping Purchases to 21

Wisconsin Senate Bill 524 (SB 524) has been reintroduced to raise the legal purchasing age for tobacco and electronic nicotine products from 18 to 21, aiming to eliminate the gap between state law and the federal “Tobacco 21” standard. Some retailers in Madison have already voluntarily adopted the 21-year age limit, while the American Lung Association is urging swift legislative action.

Dec.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai

BAT Subsidiary Warns of Surge in Illegal Nicotine Pouches in Canada, Calls for Unified Regulatory Framework

Imperial Tobacco Canada, a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, has urged the federal government to respond to the spread of illegal nicotine pouches by allowing approved products to be sold through a wider range of adult retail channels. The company is also calling for stronger retail inspections, enhanced digital tracking, and closer coordination among provinces to build a consistent regulatory framework and restore the accessibility of the legal market.