Ohio Court Allows Cities to Enforce Ban on Flavored Tobacco

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.20.2024
Ohio Court Allows Cities to Enforce Ban on Flavored Tobacco
Ohio Judge Rules Statewide Flavor Ban Unconstitutional, Allowing 21 Cities to Enforce Ban on Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products.

According to a report from Halfwheel on May 17th, there has been an update after 18 months regarding the ban on flavored tobacco products in Ohio. Judge Mark Serrott ruled that the recently passed statewide preemption law is unconstitutional, allowing for the enforcement of bans on the sale of flavored tobacco products in 21 cities involved in the lawsuit.

 

The controversy began in December 2022, when the city council of Columbus, Ohio, as the main plaintiff in the lawsuit, passed a ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products. In response, the Republican-controlled Ohio Legislature, during a special session focused on other issues, quickly passed a preemptive measure aimed at preventing cities from implementing stricter bans than state law.

 

In January 2023, Governor Mike DeWine, a Republican, vetoed a bill that would have banned the sale of flavored e-cigarettes, citing his longstanding opposition to the measure. Due to technical issues, the state legislature was unable to override DeWine's veto.

 

Last year, the state legislature attempted to pass a preemptive clause once again and successfully overturned Governor DeWine's second veto. Subsequently, cities like Columbus began to sue, Judge Serothe issued a temporary injunction allowing Columbus's law to remain in effect and halting the implementation of the state law.

 

However, this issue remains unresolved. The state government has stated that it will appeal the ruling by Judge Serott to the Tenth Circuit Court. Cities not involved in this lawsuit are still bound by state law.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Military Smoking Debate Spotlights E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches as a “Bridge”
U.S. Military Smoking Debate Spotlights E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches as a “Bridge”
At a policy forum hosted by The Hill and sponsored by PMI US, U.S. defense health officials, lawmakers and industry representatives discussed tobacco use in the military and explored the potential role of smoke-free nicotine products — including e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches — as transitional tools to help service members reduce reliance on combustible cigarettes.
PMI
Mar.23
FDA nicotine pouch review delay report knocks tobacco shares lower
FDA nicotine pouch review delay report knocks tobacco shares lower
After Reuters reported before the market open that FDA reviews of nicotine pouch applications could face delays, shares of Philip Morris International, Turning Point Brands and British American Tobacco fell on April 1, underscoring the direct impact of U.S. regulatory signals on major tobacco companies and nicotine pouch expectations.
Apr.02
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian business groups are trying to persuade the authorities to abandon plans to ban the sale of e-cigarettes and related liquids at both the federal and regional levels.
Apr.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Brazilian Police Find More Than 40,000 E-Cigarettes in Truck With Hidden Safe
Brazilian Police Find More Than 40,000 E-Cigarettes in Truck With Hidden Safe
Military police in Brazil’s Paraná state found more than 40,000 e-cigarettes inside a truck with a hidden safe on April 8 in Campina Grande do Sul, in the Curitiba metropolitan area.
Apr.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Netherlands Plans Law to Ban Possession of Large Quantities of Vapes Intended for Trade
Netherlands Plans Law to Ban Possession of Large Quantities of Vapes Intended for Trade
Dutch Health Minister Hermans is drafting legislation that would also ban possession of larger quantities of vapes, allowing the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority to intervene earlier and seize stock before proving that trade has taken place.
Apr.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Michigan Senate Bill 786 Seeks to Ban Sale of Vapes With Metal Heating Elements
Michigan Senate Bill 786 Seeks to Ban Sale of Vapes With Metal Heating Elements
Michigan lawmakers introduced Senate Bill 786 on February 18, 2026, proposing to prohibit the sale or transfer of vapor products that contain heating elements unless those elements are made of or encased in glass or ceramic materials
Regulations
Feb.21