Rampant Counterfeit ZYN Nicotine Pouches in U.S. Market

Aug.16.2024
Rampant Counterfeit ZYN Nicotine Pouches in U.S. Market
Fake ZYN nicotine pouches flood the US market, posing serious risks to consumers and prompting concerns about brand integrity.

Special announcement:

Rampant Counterfeit ZYN Nicotine Pouches in U.S. Market
The whistleblower claimed that they have never found a genuine box of ZYN in the four states they visited.


The information in this article comes from online users, and FIRSTS is unable to verify the authenticity of this information. We are simply providing industry news and information quickly and widely.

Rampant Counterfeit ZYN Nicotine Pouches in U.S. Market
An American wholesaler consulted the informant in this article about the source of ZYN products. | Image source: Informant


If you have any objections to the revelations in this article or would like to communicate with us, please feel free to contact us through the following email address: info@2firsts.com.

Rampant Counterfeit ZYN Nicotine Pouches in U.S. Market
Click on the image to read "The Mystery of Counterfeit Nicotine Pouches: Why are Fake Products Proliferating? How to Combat Counterfeit Goods Displacing Genuine Ones?


This article is not responsible for the accuracy of the information disclosed. Readers should maintain a rational mindset while reading and carefully evaluate the information.


In the highly competitive and saturated e-cigarette market, nicotine pouches are gaining attention as an emerging area. However, due to technology patents protection, technological barriers, and regulatory policy uncertainty, the market for nicotine pouches is flooded with counterfeit products. Addressing this issue, 2FIRSTS conducted a thorough analysis in their previous report, "Suspicions of Counterfeiting in the Nicotine Pouch Industry: Why are Fake Products So Common? How to Address the Problem of Bad Money Driving Out Good Money?" The report revealed the risks of counterfeit and compliance in the rapidly growing nicotine pouch market, highlighting the complexities of the market.


After the article was published, a senior figure in the nicotine pouch industry who is currently visiting the US market shared his observations with 2FIRSTS. According to him, counterfeit versions of the well-known brand ZYN are rampant in New York, New Jersey, Virginia, and Arizona. He described the situation as alarming, stating that during his visits he did not come across a single authentic box of ZYN in any of these four states.


Counterfeit ZYN products are now being sold in several states in the United States at twice the price of VELO.


According to reports, in the American market, in addition to the ZYN brand, there are also other nicotine pouch brands such as ROGUE, VELO, ON!, and FRE. However, ZYN is not only the most widely available brand, but also the most rampant in terms of counterfeit products.


ZYN, acquired by Philip Morris International (PMI) from Swedish Match, saw its shipment volume of nicotine pouches reach 266.7 million cans in the first half of 2024, representing a 63.5% year-on-year increase, as indicated in its performance report.


The sharp increase in sales has led to a market imbalance of supply and demand. According to industry insiders, counterfeit ZYN products are widely distributed in various retail terminals such as convenience stores, tobacco shops, e-cigarette stores, and gas stations, with prices ranging from $6.99 to $9.99, similar to authentic products. However, the nicotine pouch brand VELO, owned by British American Tobacco, is priced at only $4.99, while FRE is priced at just $2.99.


The appearance is so real that it is difficult to distinguish, and the taste is described as "sugar-like.


What is even more worrying is that these counterfeits closely resemble the authentic products in terms of appearance, including box design, color combinations, and material textures, making it almost impossible to distinguish between the two. As a result, not only do average consumers struggle to identify the authenticity of products, but even most shop owners lack a clear understanding of the authenticity of the goods they sell.


Although distinguishing between real and fake ZYN can be difficult, industry insiders have provided a viable method. They point out that the bottom of the box of ZYN contains a QR code, which consumers can scan after purchasing the genuine product to directly access the official ZYN website. If the QR code scanned is for a counterfeit product, it will first redirect to an unknown website before potentially redirecting to the ZYN official website.


In addition, authenticity can also be discerned through the use of experience. According to him, counterfeit ZYN products have significant differences in user experience compared to the genuine ones, with the fakes giving a feeling "like candy." He speculated that these imitation products may not contain any nicotine at all, or only contain a small amount of nicotine, in order to reduce production costs.


Where do counterfeit products come from?


In the article "Suspicions of Nicotine Pouch Counterfeiting: Why are Fake Products Frequently Emerging? How to Combat Bad Money Drives Out Good Money?" 2FIRSTS once held in-depth discussions with industry experts on this issue. At that time, several industry insiders pointed out that China is one of the sources of counterfeit nicotine pouches.


According to the investigation conducted by the aforementioned sources, the conclusion is unanimous - the majority of counterfeit ZYN products originate from manufacturers in China. Some American wholesalers even inquired about the supply chain for ZYN pouches and bluntly stated, "Everyone making zyn in china now.


However, it is understood that ZYN's official production facility is located in Sweden. Philip Morris International (PMI) announced in July of this year that a new ZYN production plant will be built in Colorado, USA. Currently, there are no officially authorized contract factories in China.


This phenomenon has already raised concerns among some industry insiders in the United States, who worry that as brands continue to expand, the issue of counterfeit goods may also arise. As mentioned by the aforementioned individuals, a client who has already obtained PMTA certification raised the question to him: if they were to manufacture products in China, would they also face the risk of being counterfeited as their business grows.


An expert in the emerging tobacco industry stated that from an industry perspective, nicotine pouches as a new form of nicotine consumption have always been controversial, especially in terms of their use by young people and health impacts. The issue of counterfeit products may exacerbate these concerns, prompting regulatory agencies and public health experts to more closely scrutinize this market.


At the same time, for legitimate manufacturers, the proliferation of counterfeit goods could damage their brand image and force them to invest more resources to protect their intellectual property and consumer rights.


For industries in China, this approach will lead to a severe lack of trust in Chinese-made nicotine pouch products overseas, causing incalculable damage to the industry's progress and development.


2FIRSTS will continue to monitor the counterfeit nicotine pouch incident and provide timely updates on the latest developments.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia's new retail tobacco permit system took effect October 1, requiring sellers of vapes, nicotine products and related devices and accessories to obtain a Retail Tobacco Permit for each business location. Virginia ABC said more than 3,000 businesses applied in September alone, creating a processing backlog. Qualifying applicants that filed before October 1 may temporarily operate under a Letter of Authorization. The new store-level permit also sits alongside Virginia's existing vape product directory, where sales of unlisted liquid nicotine or nicotine vapor products can trigger civil penalties starting at $5,000.
Regulations
Oct.03
Italy Proposes Earlier Vape and HTP Tax Hikes, New Rules for E-Liquid Pricing, Exclusive Deals and Distribution
Italy Proposes Earlier Vape and HTP Tax Hikes, New Rules for E-Liquid Pricing, Exclusive Deals and Distribution
Italy's proposed 2027–2029 budget would bring forward scheduled tax increases for e-cigarette liquids and heated tobacco products from January 1, 2028, to July 1, 2027. The consumption tax coefficient for nicotine-containing e-liquids would rise from 20% to 22%, that for nicotine-free liquids and applicable flavorings from 15% to 17%, and the heated-tobacco coefficient from 41% to 42%. The bill would also introduce official retail price schedules for e-liquids, restrict exclusive agreements between retailers and suppliers, and limit single-brand-dominated displays, sales incentives and bundled offers. Importing, authorized warehousing and retailer sourcing arrangements would also change. The proposals remain subject to parliamentary approval and subsequent implementing regulations.
Regulations
Nov.04
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Three R.J. Reynolds companies are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY challenging the FDA's 2021 PMTA final rule. The companies dispute how the agency uses Acceptance and Filing reviews and completeness determinations to establish when the Tobacco Control Act's 180-day decision period begins. Reynolds has also linked prolonged PMTA reviews to competition from unauthorized vaping products. The FDA, meanwhile, has been accelerating reviews and reducing its backlog.
Sep.14
Special Report | From Oversupply to Supply Gaps: Global Tobacco Leaf Markets Diverge Ahead of 2027
Special Report | From Oversupply to Supply Gaps: Global Tobacco Leaf Markets Diverge Ahead of 2027
Global tobacco leaf markets diverged sharply in 2026, with India cutting authorised FCV production amid oversupply while Malawi faced a supply shortfall. U.S. demand improved in some leaf categories, but growers in Brazil, Colombia, Tanzania and Zimbabwe faced pressure from prices, buyer access, costs and weather. With nicotine consumption patterns also shifting, 2027 will test whether supply, demand and grower profitability can move back toward balance.
Oct.26
Iowa Sets November 16 Vape Directory Launch: Unlisted Products Face Sales Ban, Manufacturers $1,000 Daily Fines per Product
Iowa Sets November 16 Vape Directory Launch: Unlisted Products Face Sales Ban, Manufacturers $1,000 Daily Fines per Product
Iowa plans to publish its first vapor products directory on November 16, 2026, after which products not listed will be prohibited from sale or offer for sale in the state. The Department of Revenue expects to begin penalty enforcement on December 17, following an initial 21-business-day period focused on compliance education. Under House File 2677, retailers, distributors and wholesalers selling unlisted products face civil penalties of $300 per product per day, while manufacturers face $1,000 per product per day. Eligibility extends to FDA-authorized products and certain products meeting historical marketing and pending PMTA requirements. The directory program resumed after a federal appeals court vacated a preliminary injunction in July 2026.
Regulations
Nov.05