Rising E-cigarette Use Among Youth Raises Concerns in Blackpool

Dec.02.2022
Rising E-cigarette Use Among Youth Raises Concerns in Blackpool
More teenagers in Blackpool are using e-cigarettes, with health officials warning of potential nicotine addiction and long-term health effects.

Dr. Arif Rajpura, the head of public health at Blackpool, is concerned that local schools in the area are indicating a sustained trend in increasing usage.


Dr. Arif Rajpura, Public Health Director of the Hikaze Council - Image source: The Gazette.


New statistical data from ASH (Action on Smoking and Health) reveals that 15.8% of UK teenagers between the ages of 11 and 17 have tried vaping, compared to 11.2% and 13.9% in 2021 and 2020, respectively. The percentage of current users in the same age group is 7%, down from 3.3% in 2021 and 4.1% in 2020.


Dr. Rajpura supports the position of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), which advises that non-smoking children, young people, and young adults should not try or regularly use e-cigarettes.


He said, "Through preliminary discussions with local schools regarding ASH statistics, we have heard many people express concerns about an increase in the use of these products among children and young adults.


We are awaiting the results of an investigation by SHEU (Schools and Student Health Education Department) to understand the local situation in Blackburn. The committee has also commissioned further collaboration with Healthwatch and the local community to gather more in-depth information.


E-cigarettes are a product with age restrictions as users could become addicted to nicotine-containing e-cigarettes. They are not a risk-free choice, especially for non-smokers for whom the long-term health effects of e-cigarettes are still unknown.


Further research is necessary on this issue, but it is advisable to discourage the use of electronic cigarettes. The support of families, guardians, and schools in promoting this message is crucial.


In the local area, we provide comprehensive personal, social, and health education support for schools focused on children and youth education, and endorse their protection policies.


Dr. Rajpura reiterated that it is illegal for anyone to sell cigarettes or e-cigarette products containing nicotine or tobacco to individuals under 18 years of age, or to purchase these products on behalf of individuals under 18 years of age. It is the responsibility of the Blackpool Trading Standards in the resort and the Lancashire Trading Standards of Fylde and Wyre to enforce laws regarding the sale of products to minors, illegal product sales, and sales point advertising.


Debra Challinor, the owner of the Saint Anne Let's Go Vape shop, has stated that her industry is well-regulated and part of this regulation involves checking the age of anyone entering an electronic cigarette store.


She said that all reputable professional e-cigarette stores adhere to very strict regulations, which have been in effect for some time.


We always check age and strictly refuse anyone under 18. It's not worth the risk for the business since fines can be very severe.


Electronic cigarettes are just one type of product that may not be strictly regulated in some stores, but our recommendation is always to use a specialized store that strictly follows the rules.


2FIRSTS will continue to follow and report on this issue. Further updates will be available on the "2FIRSTS APP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
According to CBS Los Angeles on August 27, 2026, California lawmakers have passed Assembly Bill 762, which would phase out disposable, battery-embedded nicotine vapes in the state. If signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, manufacturing and importation of the covered products would be prohibited beginning January 1, 2027, followed by a sales ban on January 1, 2028. Driven primarily by concerns over electronic waste, lithium-battery fires and environmental pollution, the legislation would further shift California’s legal vape market toward rechargeable, refillable or replaceable-pod devices.
Aug.28
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine are already appearing in e-cigarettes and oral pouches, even as key human evidence remains limited. A new Nixodine-S study adds nonclinical data showing differences from nicotine in cytotoxicity and receptor activity, while independent studies point to a more complex toxicological picture. With supply-chain activity growing and FDA seeking clearer authority over nicotine analogues, the industry now faces a larger question: what evidence is needed before these substances can credibly replace nicotine?
SCIENCE
Sep.23
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
Acme Vape Ltd, the company behind UK vaping brand IVG, has received HM Revenue & Customs approval to operate an excise warehouse for vaping products and participate in the Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme. The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Acme Vape Ltd says its approved warehouse in Preston will become operational under the new regime on the same date.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
Ahead of the Formula 1 race in Madrid, 67 Spanish and international public-health, medical and consumer organizations have sent an open letter to F1 President and CEO Stefano Domenicali calling for an end to sponsorships linked to the tobacco and nicotine industry, including nicotine pouches, vaping products and heated tobacco. The letter focuses on Philip Morris International’s ZYN partnership with Ferrari and British American Tobacco’s long-running partnership with McLaren and exposure for VELO. The campaign follows a March letter in which more than 160 organizations worldwide made a similar request to Formula 1.
Sep.10
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14