According to a report by ET News on December 4th, new regulations governing synthetic nicotine tobacco in South Korea are expected to be delayed until next year. The discussion on amending the law has been postponed again by the National Assembly after a public hearing, causing confusion among lawmakers and the government about responsibility for the unprecedented martial law incident, and discussions on public welfare issues will be put on hold.
According to industry and congressional sources, the schedule for a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Tobacco Business Act concerning the regulation of synthetic nicotine tobacco has not yet been determined by the Economic and Fiscal Committees Planning Committee. At the first meeting of the Economic and Fiscal Subcommittee held on the 27th of last month, ten proposed amendments to the Tobacco Business Act were discussed but not passed due to disagreements among ruling and opposition party members. It was decided thereafter to hold a public hearing to gather input from stakeholders, but progress has been slow.
Currently, the core issue regarding the amendment is whether synthetic nicotine tobacco products should be categorized under tobacco laws. Synthetic nicotine is currently classified as an industrial product rather than tobacco in the existing Tobacco Business Law, therefore it is not subject to relevant regulations.
The South Korean government recently stated that the harm of synthetic nicotine e-cigarettes is equivalent to that of regular tobacco and should be regulated according to the "Tobacco Business Act." However, due to limitations in the legislative process and unresolved issues related to the tax rate of synthetic nicotine tobacco, this proposed legislation has not made substantial progress.
In addition, due to the imposition of martial law and other issues such as the regulation of synthetic nicotine tobacco, it is unlikely that the amendment to the Tobacco Control Act will be passed within the year.
An industry insider commented, "The harmfulness of synthetic nicotine tobacco has been established, and youth organizations and others have strongly called for regulation, so there is consensus on the need for it. The timing will depend on the National Assembly’s discussion schedule, but there is little disagreement on the need for regulation."
Notice
1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.
2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.
Copyright
This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.
This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.
