State Tobacco Monopoly Administration Releases Typical Cases of E-Cigarette Law Enforcement

Nov.07.2024
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration Releases Typical Cases of E-Cigarette Law Enforcement
The State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has strengthened e-cigarette regulation by releasing three typical cases to intensify the crackdown on illegal activities within the industry.

2Firsts Reprinted and Translated from the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration

 

This year, tobacco monopoly administrative departments at all levels have resolutely implemented the decisions and directives of the Central Committee of the Communist Party and the State Council, strengthening the full-chain regulation of e-cigarettes.

 

They have taken strong action against illegal and non-compliant e-cigarette activities, investigating and addressing administrative cases in accordance with the law, while continuously working to purify the market order and environment for e-cigarettes. To maximize their deterrent effect, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has released three typical cases of e-cigarette law enforcement.

 

 

Zhejiang Mirui Sales of Illegally Manufactured E-Cigarette Products

 

 

From January 2024 until the case was discovered, Zhejiang Mirui Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (e-cigarette brand holder, tobacco monopoly manufacturing license number: 7133020055, hereinafter referred to as Zhejiang Mirui) repeatedly instructed Shenzhen Langyou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (a vaporizer production company, tobacco monopoly manufacturing license number: 4144030089, hereinafter referred to as Shenzhen Langyou) to add ingredients to domestic e-cigarette products, such as the "MR Miroo - Meteor Disposable E-Cigarette (Wu Ti)," that were not included in the technically reviewed formula.

 

This resulted in discrepancies between the actual products and the information approved through the technical review, constituting the sale of illegally produced e-cigarette products. In accordance with relevant laws and regulations, Zhejiang Mirui was ordered to cease selling the products, confiscate the illegal gains, and pay a fine of 1.0012 million yuan. Shenzhen Langyou has been dealt with in a separate case.

 

 

Shenzhen Bode Sales of Illegally Manufactured E-Cigarette Products, Operating Outside the Permitted Scope of Vaporizer Production

 

 

From January 2024 until the case was discovered, Boulder (Shenzhen) Technologies, Inc. (e-cigarette brand holder, tobacco monopoly manufacturing license number: 7144030063, hereinafter referred to as Shenzhen Boulder) added ingredients to domestic e-cigarette products like the "Bode Boulder - Classic Series - Jade Dragon Snow Mountain" that were not included in the technically reviewed formula. This led to discrepancies between the products and the approved technical review information, constituting the sale of illegally produced e-cigarette products. 

 

Additionally, Shenzhen Boulder did not possess the qualification to produce vaporizers and, from October 2022 to May 2024, it produced and exported vaporizers, thus engaging in business activities outside its permitted scope. In accordance with relevant laws and regulations, Shenzhen Boulder was ordered to stop selling the related e-cigarette products, fined 3.1514 million yuan, publicly destroyed the illegally sold e-cigarette products, suspended production and business activities for two months, and underwent business rectification.

 

 

Shenzhen Mevol Sales of Illegally Manufactured E-Cigarette Products

 

 

From November 2023 to February 2024, Shenzhen Mevol Chuangxin Technology Co. (e-cigarette brand holder, tobacco monopoly manufacturing license number: 7144030126, hereinafter referred to as Shenzhen Mevol) knowingly sold e-cigarette products such as the "Miwo Mevol-Go·Sangyu Muyu," despite discrepancies between the products and those approved through technical review. 

 

This constitutes the sale of illegally manufactured e-cigarette products. In accordance with relevant laws and regulations, Shenzhen Mevol was ordered to stop selling the related e-cigarette products, fined 805,200 yuan, and publicly destroyed the illegally sold products.

 

 

Case Warnings

 

 

In order to prevent the inducement of minors to use e-cigarettes and to safeguard public health and safety, the "E-Cigarette Management Measures" explicitly stipulate that e-cigarette products not approved through technical review must not be marketed or sold. Products available on the market must align with the information of those that have passed the technical review.

 

The companies involved in these cases, motivated by profit, have violated national laws, regulations, and regulatory provisions by introducing ingredients outside the approved technical formulas into domestic e-cigarette products. As a result, these products did not conform to the approved specifications.、

 

Such actions pose a significant risk to public health, particularly the health of minors, disrupt the integrity of the e-cigarette market, and necessitate legal investigation and appropriate penalties. The typical cases published in this instance underscore the steadfast commitment of the tobacco monopoly administrative authorities to enforce e-cigarette regulation in strict accordance with the law.

 

Moving forward, tobacco monopoly administrative departments at all levels will diligently fulfill their responsibilities in e-cigarette regulation, intensify oversight, and actively investigate similar cases. They will further strengthen legal protections against the harmful effects of e-cigarettes on minors, safeguard public health, and expedite the establishment of a robust quality assurance system for e-cigarette products.

 

The responsibility for product quality will be firmly placed on the producers of e-cigarettes, with stringent supervision over the establishment and implementation of internal quality control management systems. Additionally, efforts will be made to enhance legal education and policy dissemination, guiding e-cigarette operators to comply with laws and regulations. In doing so, the regulatory framework governing e-cigarettes will continue to be strengthened, ensuring the ongoing consolidation of legal and regulatory achievements in e-cigarette governance.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Holdings said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration notified the company on June 23, 2026, that 30 PACHA vape SKUs with submitted PMTAs had been tentatively identified for inclusion on a planned public-facing FDA webpage. Under enforcement guidance issued by FDA in May, the webpage is intended to identify certain unauthorized products for which the agency generally does not intend to prioritize enforcement of premarket authorization requirements. Charlie’s disclosed the development alongside second-quarter revenue of $3.8 million, up 116% year over year.
Aug.25
2Firsts Exclusive Analysis | RLX Q2 Revenue Rises 14.8%, Company Takes Control of Western European Distributor and Expands Multi-Category Strategy
2Firsts Exclusive Analysis | RLX Q2 Revenue Rises 14.8%, Company Takes Control of Western European Distributor and Expands Multi-Category Strategy
business accounting for 68.5% of sales. A new controlling investment in a Western European distributor and plans to scale modern oral nicotine pouches point to a broader international strategy spanning channels and multiple product categories.
Special Report
Aug.14
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippine lawmakers are considering an overhaul of the country's vape excise-tax regime to eliminate the wide gap between taxes on nicotine salt and freebase nicotine liquids and reduce incentives for misdeclaration. House Bill 5364, filed by Rep. Rufus Rodriguez and Rep. Maximo Rodriguez Jr., would impose a unified ₱10-per-milliliter tax on vapor products, with 5% annual increases beginning in 2027. Rodriguez says the proposal could generate an average ₱6 billion in annual collections from 2027 through 2030. The debate comes as the Philippine government considers tobacco, vape and other health-tax reforms to help offset around ₱66 billion in revenue expected to be forgone under a proposed tax-relief package.
Aug.18
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, an Altria Group company, has broken ground on an approximately $250 million manufacturing expansion in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. The roughly 270,000-square-foot facility is expected to create more than 200 jobs and absorb processing, manufacturing and packaging operations currently split between Hopkinsville and Nashville, Tennessee. USSTC previously said production at its Nashville facility is expected to wind down by early 2028. The project forms part of Altria’s broader effort to modernize and consolidate its U.S. smokeless tobacco manufacturing network.
Sep.10
Germany's Four-Year Tobacco Tax Plan Heads to Parliament as BAT, JTI and PMI Push for Changes
Germany's Four-Year Tobacco Tax Plan Heads to Parliament as BAT, JTI and PMI Push for Changes
Germany's parliament is scheduled to hold a first reading of amendments to the Tobacco Tax Act on September 24. The government plans annual tax increases from 2027 through 2030 covering cigarettes, heated tobacco, vaping liquids and other categories. It expects the reform to generate €756 million in additional revenue in 2027, rising to €3.589 billion in additional annual revenue by 2030. Ahead of the parliamentary debate, the German Association of the Tobacco Industry and Novel Products, or BVTE, launched the "Tabaksteuer mit Augenmaß" campaign backed by BAT, JTI, Philip Morris, Reemtsma and wholesale and retail groups.
Sep.23
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives