State Tobacco Monopoly Administration Releases Typical Cases of E-Cigarette Law Enforcement

Nov.07.2024
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration Releases Typical Cases of E-Cigarette Law Enforcement
The State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has strengthened e-cigarette regulation by releasing three typical cases to intensify the crackdown on illegal activities within the industry.

2Firsts Reprinted and Translated from the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration

 

This year, tobacco monopoly administrative departments at all levels have resolutely implemented the decisions and directives of the Central Committee of the Communist Party and the State Council, strengthening the full-chain regulation of e-cigarettes.

 

They have taken strong action against illegal and non-compliant e-cigarette activities, investigating and addressing administrative cases in accordance with the law, while continuously working to purify the market order and environment for e-cigarettes. To maximize their deterrent effect, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has released three typical cases of e-cigarette law enforcement.

 

 

Zhejiang Mirui Sales of Illegally Manufactured E-Cigarette Products

 

 

From January 2024 until the case was discovered, Zhejiang Mirui Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (e-cigarette brand holder, tobacco monopoly manufacturing license number: 7133020055, hereinafter referred to as Zhejiang Mirui) repeatedly instructed Shenzhen Langyou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (a vaporizer production company, tobacco monopoly manufacturing license number: 4144030089, hereinafter referred to as Shenzhen Langyou) to add ingredients to domestic e-cigarette products, such as the "MR Miroo - Meteor Disposable E-Cigarette (Wu Ti)," that were not included in the technically reviewed formula.

 

This resulted in discrepancies between the actual products and the information approved through the technical review, constituting the sale of illegally produced e-cigarette products. In accordance with relevant laws and regulations, Zhejiang Mirui was ordered to cease selling the products, confiscate the illegal gains, and pay a fine of 1.0012 million yuan. Shenzhen Langyou has been dealt with in a separate case.

 

 

Shenzhen Bode Sales of Illegally Manufactured E-Cigarette Products, Operating Outside the Permitted Scope of Vaporizer Production

 

 

From January 2024 until the case was discovered, Boulder (Shenzhen) Technologies, Inc. (e-cigarette brand holder, tobacco monopoly manufacturing license number: 7144030063, hereinafter referred to as Shenzhen Boulder) added ingredients to domestic e-cigarette products like the "Bode Boulder - Classic Series - Jade Dragon Snow Mountain" that were not included in the technically reviewed formula. This led to discrepancies between the products and the approved technical review information, constituting the sale of illegally produced e-cigarette products. 

 

Additionally, Shenzhen Boulder did not possess the qualification to produce vaporizers and, from October 2022 to May 2024, it produced and exported vaporizers, thus engaging in business activities outside its permitted scope. In accordance with relevant laws and regulations, Shenzhen Boulder was ordered to stop selling the related e-cigarette products, fined 3.1514 million yuan, publicly destroyed the illegally sold e-cigarette products, suspended production and business activities for two months, and underwent business rectification.

 

 

Shenzhen Mevol Sales of Illegally Manufactured E-Cigarette Products

 

 

From November 2023 to February 2024, Shenzhen Mevol Chuangxin Technology Co. (e-cigarette brand holder, tobacco monopoly manufacturing license number: 7144030126, hereinafter referred to as Shenzhen Mevol) knowingly sold e-cigarette products such as the "Miwo Mevol-Go·Sangyu Muyu," despite discrepancies between the products and those approved through technical review. 

 

This constitutes the sale of illegally manufactured e-cigarette products. In accordance with relevant laws and regulations, Shenzhen Mevol was ordered to stop selling the related e-cigarette products, fined 805,200 yuan, and publicly destroyed the illegally sold products.

 

 

Case Warnings

 

 

In order to prevent the inducement of minors to use e-cigarettes and to safeguard public health and safety, the "E-Cigarette Management Measures" explicitly stipulate that e-cigarette products not approved through technical review must not be marketed or sold. Products available on the market must align with the information of those that have passed the technical review.

 

The companies involved in these cases, motivated by profit, have violated national laws, regulations, and regulatory provisions by introducing ingredients outside the approved technical formulas into domestic e-cigarette products. As a result, these products did not conform to the approved specifications.、

 

Such actions pose a significant risk to public health, particularly the health of minors, disrupt the integrity of the e-cigarette market, and necessitate legal investigation and appropriate penalties. The typical cases published in this instance underscore the steadfast commitment of the tobacco monopoly administrative authorities to enforce e-cigarette regulation in strict accordance with the law.

 

Moving forward, tobacco monopoly administrative departments at all levels will diligently fulfill their responsibilities in e-cigarette regulation, intensify oversight, and actively investigate similar cases. They will further strengthen legal protections against the harmful effects of e-cigarettes on minors, safeguard public health, and expedite the establishment of a robust quality assurance system for e-cigarette products.

 

The responsibility for product quality will be firmly placed on the producers of e-cigarettes, with stringent supervision over the establishment and implementation of internal quality control management systems. Additionally, efforts will be made to enhance legal education and policy dissemination, guiding e-cigarette operators to comply with laws and regulations. In doing so, the regulatory framework governing e-cigarettes will continue to be strengthened, ensuring the ongoing consolidation of legal and regulatory achievements in e-cigarette governance.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Holdings said in its latest shareholder letter that it is moving to commercialize PACHA products and monetize its PMTA assets as the FDA changes enforcement priorities for unauthorized ENDS products. Thirty PACHA SKUs were previously tentatively identified for a proposed public list of products that the FDA generally does not intend to prioritize for enforcement. Charlie’s is also preparing test-market sales of age-gated flavored disposables and says it currently holds 678 PMTA-related product assets while seeking additional strategic transactions and partnerships.
Sep.11
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Smoore’s first-half 2026 revenue rose 19.9%, but the results revealed growing structural risks beneath the headline growth. Heat-not-burn contributed about 61% of incremental revenue and remains driven largely by one core customer, while traditional vaping markets diverged, own-brand growth slowed and China enterprise revenue declined further. Gross profit and adjusted profit lagged revenue growth, while second-quarter revenue growth slowed to about 1.9%, putting greater focus on the quality, concentration and sustainability of Smoore’s expansion.
Capital Markets
Aug.20
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21
NAS 2026 | Cliff Douglas: Risk Continuum Should Play a Central Role in Tobacco Policy
NAS 2026 | Cliff Douglas: Risk Continuum Should Play a Central Role in Tobacco Policy
Cliff Douglas, a veteran U.S. tobacco-control and public health policy figure, told NAS 2026 that the “continuum of risk” should play a central role in tobacco policy. He called for clearer market pathways, stronger risk communication, differentiated regulation and enforcement, and said possible FDA reforms to PMTA reviews could be a “welcome correction” if they create a more efficient, predictable route for scientifically substantiated lower-risk products. Read 2Firsts’ on-site coverage.
Sep.26
Germany's Four-Year Tobacco Tax Plan Heads to Parliament as BAT, JTI and PMI Push for Changes
Germany's Four-Year Tobacco Tax Plan Heads to Parliament as BAT, JTI and PMI Push for Changes
Germany's parliament is scheduled to hold a first reading of amendments to the Tobacco Tax Act on September 24. The government plans annual tax increases from 2027 through 2030 covering cigarettes, heated tobacco, vaping liquids and other categories. It expects the reform to generate €756 million in additional revenue in 2027, rising to €3.589 billion in additional annual revenue by 2030. Ahead of the parliamentary debate, the German Association of the Tobacco Industry and Novel Products, or BVTE, launched the "Tabaksteuer mit Augenmaß" campaign backed by BAT, JTI, Philip Morris, Reemtsma and wholesale and retail groups.
Sep.23
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives