State Tobacco Monopoly Administration's Revised E-Cigarette Product Review Guidelines

Aug.20.2024
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration's Revised E-Cigarette Product Review Guidelines
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration releases new e-cigarette technical evaluation rules in effort to improve regulatory standards.

On August 20, the official website of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration released a notice and implementation rules regarding the "Revised and Issued Implementation Rules for the Technical Review of E-cigarette Products.


The following is the original text: "法院判决,被告因盗窃罪而被判处两年监禁,须支付2万美元罚款。" Translation: "The court ruled that the defendant was sentenced to two years in prison for theft and must pay a fine of $20,000.


Interpretation of the "Regulations on the Technical Review of E-cigarette Products" Policy


In order to further standardize the technical review and management of e-cigarette products, as well as enhance the regulation of e-cigarettes, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has revised and issued the "Implementation Rules for Technical Review of e-cigarette Products".


The revision strengthens the coordination with relevant laws and regulations, and optimizes and improves the requirements for the technical evaluation of e-cigarette products. The revised "Implementation Rules for the Technical Evaluation of E-cigarette Products" mainly includes general principles, application procedures, technical evaluation, and supplementary provisions, totaling four chapters and twenty-six articles. The main content includes: clarifying the scope of technical evaluation and the management functions of various regulatory entities; specifying the basic requirements for technical evaluation applications, including the conditions for applicants, the conditions for e-cigarette products, and the required application materials; and outlining the main process, working methods, and related requirements for technical evaluation.


Notice on the Revision and Issuance of the Implementation Rules for the Technical Evaluation of E-cigarette Products by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration.


National Tobacco Law [2024] No. 120


Please provide an interpretation in standard English used in journalism.


Provincial tobacco monopoly bureaus, China Tobacco Corporation's Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute, and Shanghai New Tobacco Product Research Institute Co., Ltd., along with relevant units:


In order to further implement the "Regulations on the Management of E-Cigarettes" (Announcement No. 1 of 2022 by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration) and standardize the technical evaluation of e-cigarette products, the revised "Implementation Rules for the Technical Evaluation of E-Cigarette Products" are now issued to you for strict compliance and execution.


Translate to standard journalistic English: "At approximately 9:00 p.m. last night, a violent altercation broke out outside of a local bar, resulting in several injuries and arrests. Police are currently investigating the incident and are asking anyone with information to come forward.


Please translate into standard journalistic English.


State Tobacco Monopoly Administration refers to the government agency responsible for overseeing and regulating the tobacco industry in a specific state or country.


August 13, 2024


voluntarily disclose


Implementation details of e-cigarette product technology review are established.


Chapter One: General Principles


The first article of these guidelines is created to regulate the technical evaluation and management of e-cigarette products, ensuring consumer rights. This is in accordance with the laws and regulations such as the "Tobacco Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China," the "Implementation Regulations of the Tobacco Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China," and the "Regulations on the Administration of e-cigarettes" (Announcement No. 1 of 2022 by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration).


The second regulation states that e-cigarette products sold within the People's Republic of China must undergo technical evaluation. E-cigarette products that do not pass technical evaluation are not allowed to be sold on the market.


The third rule states that the e-cigarette products referred to in these regulations include pods, vaporizers, disposable e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette products sold in a single packaging unit in accordance with national standards.


The fourth article states that the State Council's administrative department in charge of tobacco monopoly is responsible for the formulation, publication, and adjustment of the technical evaluation management system, as well as the supervision and management of the implementation of technical evaluations.


The provincial tobacco monopoly administration is responsible for the acceptance of applications for technical review of e-cigarette products within its administrative area, as well as for the supervision and management of the implementation of technical reviews.


The technical evaluation work is organized by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, the competent administrative department of the State Council, and implemented by professional institutions (hereinafter referred to as technical evaluation agencies).


Please translate the following text to standard journalistic English: "Authorities have released a statement saying that they are currently investigating the incident and are urging anyone with information to come forward. Details about the incident are still scarce, but witnesses claim to have seen a suspect fleeing the scene. The investigation is ongoing and updates will be provided as more information becomes available.


Chapter 2: Application


Article 5: Applicants for e-cigarette product technology evaluation (hereinafter referred to as applicants) shall submit their technical evaluation applications to the provincial tobacco monopoly administrative authority where the company is located through the e-cigarette product technology evaluation management system (hereinafter referred to as the management system).


Article 6: Applicants must meet the following criteria:


(1) Possessing legal corporate status;


Acting as the trademark owner for the e-cigarette products being applied for;


(3) in compliance with national e-cigarette industry policy requirements;


The existing inventory should comply with the requirements of the national e-cigarette trading management platform in terms of saleable quantities.


Other conditions stipulated by the administrative department in charge of tobacco monopoly under the State Council.


If the owner of a trademark is a foreign company, they should entrust the institution or agent set up within the country to apply to the provincial tobacco monopoly administration department for registration.


For overseas brands holding companies applying, they must meet the conditions outlined in the first, third, and fifth clauses of the preceding paragraph.


Article 7: Applicants shall make a commitment to the legality, truthfulness, completeness, and traceability of the materials submitted.


Article 8: E-cigarette products applying for technical evaluation must meet the following conditions:


VPR Brands and SRIPLAW have begun identifying and notifying over 50 leading companies using Auto Draw technology, as VPR Brands intends to vigorously enforce its patent. These companies have been prioritized based on sales and popularity. Recently, VPR Brands LP and its legal team led by Joel B Rothman of SRIPLAW have filed lawsuits against 9 of these companies. Additional lawsuits may be filed if necessary to protect the company's intellectual property.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
2Firsts On-Site | CTIHK Showcases Nicotine Pouches, Heated Tobacco and Chinese Cigars at InterTabac 2026
2Firsts On-Site | CTIHK Showcases Nicotine Pouches, Heated Tobacco and Chinese Cigars at InterTabac 2026
At InterTabac 2026 in Dortmund, China Tobacco International (HK) Company Limited (CTIHK) is exhibiting across two separate booths in Hall 5 and Hall 4. Products observed by 2Firsts include heated tobacco products, nicotine pouches, Chinese cigars and tobacco leaf. Nicotine pouch products on display include TOOP, Shuangxi and Ashima.
Market
Sep.16
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
Japan Tobacco International's Irish business has proposed a €0.25 tax increase on a pack of 20 cigarettes in its pre-Budget 2027 submission, below the €0.50-or-more increases typically imposed in recent Irish budgets. JTI says the proposal could generate around €45 million in additional Exchequer revenue while limiting further movement toward illicit and non-Irish-tax-paid tobacco. Revenue's existing estimate for a comparable €0.25 increase, including pro-rata rises on other tobacco products, is about €18 million for a full year.
JTI
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Australian Coalition Unveils Illicit Tobacco Plan With 80% Excise Cut and Legal, Taxed Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Australian Coalition Unveils Illicit Tobacco Plan With 80% Excise Cut and Legal, Taxed Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Australia’s Coalition has unveiled a national illicit-tobacco policy that would cut tobacco excise by 80% and create legal, regulated and taxed adult markets for vaping products and nicotine pouches if it wins government. The plan proposes an excise of A$0.50 per millilitre of e-liquid and A$0.025 per milligram of nicotine in pouches, alongside A$200 million in additional enforcement and a A$60 million three-year public-awareness campaign. The Coalition says the package would narrow the price advantage of illicit products and undermine organised crime, while Labor and public-health groups warn that dramatically cheaper cigarettes could reverse long-term declines in smoking.
Sep.03
2Firsts Data|China’s Vape-Related Exports Rose 3.3% in August 2026 as UK Shipments Jumped 51.4% and U.S. Exports Fell 12.4%
2Firsts Data|China’s Vape-Related Exports Rose 3.3% in August 2026 as UK Shipments Jumped 51.4% and U.S. Exports Fell 12.4%
China exported $979 million of vape-related products in August 2026, up 3.3% from a year earlier but down 6.4% from July. The UK replaced the U.S. as the main source of growth: UK-bound shipments jumped 51.4% to a 2026 high of $177 million, while exports to the U.S. fell 12.4% to $339 million. Shipments to markets outside the U.S. increased 14.2%, broadening growth beyond the market that had driven July’s rebound.
News
Sep.23 by 2Firsts Perspectives
FDA Authorizes JUUL2, Cites Adult Switching Amid Efforts to Speed PMTA Reviews
FDA Authorizes JUUL2, Cites Adult Switching Amid Efforts to Speed PMTA Reviews
The FDA authorized the JUUL2 device and tobacco- and menthol-flavored pods on Aug. 28, bringing the number of authorized e-cigarette products to 48. The agency highlighted complete switching among adult smokers, with six-week switching rates reaching 28.4%–49.3% for the menthol pod. The decision comes as FDA works to speed PMTA reviews, reduce application backlogs and expand authorized e-cigarette and nicotine-pouch products while maintaining enforcement priorities for unauthorized products.
Regulations
Aug.29