State Tobacco Monopoly Administration's Revised E-Cigarette Product Review Guidelines

Aug.20.2024
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration's Revised E-Cigarette Product Review Guidelines
State Tobacco Monopoly Administration releases new e-cigarette technical evaluation rules in effort to improve regulatory standards.

On August 20, the official website of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration released a notice and implementation rules regarding the "Revised and Issued Implementation Rules for the Technical Review of E-cigarette Products.


The following is the original text: "法院判决,被告因盗窃罪而被判处两年监禁,须支付2万美元罚款。" Translation: "The court ruled that the defendant was sentenced to two years in prison for theft and must pay a fine of $20,000.


Interpretation of the "Regulations on the Technical Review of E-cigarette Products" Policy


In order to further standardize the technical review and management of e-cigarette products, as well as enhance the regulation of e-cigarettes, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has revised and issued the "Implementation Rules for Technical Review of e-cigarette Products".


The revision strengthens the coordination with relevant laws and regulations, and optimizes and improves the requirements for the technical evaluation of e-cigarette products. The revised "Implementation Rules for the Technical Evaluation of E-cigarette Products" mainly includes general principles, application procedures, technical evaluation, and supplementary provisions, totaling four chapters and twenty-six articles. The main content includes: clarifying the scope of technical evaluation and the management functions of various regulatory entities; specifying the basic requirements for technical evaluation applications, including the conditions for applicants, the conditions for e-cigarette products, and the required application materials; and outlining the main process, working methods, and related requirements for technical evaluation.


Notice on the Revision and Issuance of the Implementation Rules for the Technical Evaluation of E-cigarette Products by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration.


National Tobacco Law [2024] No. 120


Please provide an interpretation in standard English used in journalism.


Provincial tobacco monopoly bureaus, China Tobacco Corporation's Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute, and Shanghai New Tobacco Product Research Institute Co., Ltd., along with relevant units:


In order to further implement the "Regulations on the Management of E-Cigarettes" (Announcement No. 1 of 2022 by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration) and standardize the technical evaluation of e-cigarette products, the revised "Implementation Rules for the Technical Evaluation of E-Cigarette Products" are now issued to you for strict compliance and execution.


Translate to standard journalistic English: "At approximately 9:00 p.m. last night, a violent altercation broke out outside of a local bar, resulting in several injuries and arrests. Police are currently investigating the incident and are asking anyone with information to come forward.


Please translate into standard journalistic English.


State Tobacco Monopoly Administration refers to the government agency responsible for overseeing and regulating the tobacco industry in a specific state or country.


August 13, 2024


voluntarily disclose


Implementation details of e-cigarette product technology review are established.


Chapter One: General Principles


The first article of these guidelines is created to regulate the technical evaluation and management of e-cigarette products, ensuring consumer rights. This is in accordance with the laws and regulations such as the "Tobacco Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China," the "Implementation Regulations of the Tobacco Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China," and the "Regulations on the Administration of e-cigarettes" (Announcement No. 1 of 2022 by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration).


The second regulation states that e-cigarette products sold within the People's Republic of China must undergo technical evaluation. E-cigarette products that do not pass technical evaluation are not allowed to be sold on the market.


The third rule states that the e-cigarette products referred to in these regulations include pods, vaporizers, disposable e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette products sold in a single packaging unit in accordance with national standards.


The fourth article states that the State Council's administrative department in charge of tobacco monopoly is responsible for the formulation, publication, and adjustment of the technical evaluation management system, as well as the supervision and management of the implementation of technical evaluations.


The provincial tobacco monopoly administration is responsible for the acceptance of applications for technical review of e-cigarette products within its administrative area, as well as for the supervision and management of the implementation of technical reviews.


The technical evaluation work is organized by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, the competent administrative department of the State Council, and implemented by professional institutions (hereinafter referred to as technical evaluation agencies).


Please translate the following text to standard journalistic English: "Authorities have released a statement saying that they are currently investigating the incident and are urging anyone with information to come forward. Details about the incident are still scarce, but witnesses claim to have seen a suspect fleeing the scene. The investigation is ongoing and updates will be provided as more information becomes available.


Chapter 2: Application


Article 5: Applicants for e-cigarette product technology evaluation (hereinafter referred to as applicants) shall submit their technical evaluation applications to the provincial tobacco monopoly administrative authority where the company is located through the e-cigarette product technology evaluation management system (hereinafter referred to as the management system).


Article 6: Applicants must meet the following criteria:


(1) Possessing legal corporate status;


Acting as the trademark owner for the e-cigarette products being applied for;


(3) in compliance with national e-cigarette industry policy requirements;


The existing inventory should comply with the requirements of the national e-cigarette trading management platform in terms of saleable quantities.


Other conditions stipulated by the administrative department in charge of tobacco monopoly under the State Council.


If the owner of a trademark is a foreign company, they should entrust the institution or agent set up within the country to apply to the provincial tobacco monopoly administration department for registration.


For overseas brands holding companies applying, they must meet the conditions outlined in the first, third, and fifth clauses of the preceding paragraph.


Article 7: Applicants shall make a commitment to the legality, truthfulness, completeness, and traceability of the materials submitted.


Article 8: E-cigarette products applying for technical evaluation must meet the following conditions:


VPR Brands and SRIPLAW have begun identifying and notifying over 50 leading companies using Auto Draw technology, as VPR Brands intends to vigorously enforce its patent. These companies have been prioritized based on sales and popularity. Recently, VPR Brands LP and its legal team led by Joel B Rothman of SRIPLAW have filed lawsuits against 9 of these companies. Additional lawsuits may be filed if necessary to protect the company's intellectual property.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, an Altria Group company, has broken ground on an approximately $250 million manufacturing expansion in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. The roughly 270,000-square-foot facility is expected to create more than 200 jobs and absorb processing, manufacturing and packaging operations currently split between Hopkinsville and Nashville, Tennessee. USSTC previously said production at its Nashville facility is expected to wind down by early 2028. The project forms part of Altria’s broader effort to modernize and consolidate its U.S. smokeless tobacco manufacturing network.
Sep.10
U.S. House Defense Bill Includes Pilot Review of Vapes, Nicotine Pouches and Heated Tobacco for Military Smokers
U.S. House Defense Bill Includes Pilot Review of Vapes, Nicotine Pouches and Heated Tobacco for Military Smokers
On July 23, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes Section 707 provisions requiring the Department of Defense to evaluate tobacco use and nicotine alternatives among military personnel. The pilot program would examine products including vapes, nicotine pouches and heated tobacco products, primarily among active-duty service members who continue using combustible tobacco. The provision is a policy evaluation effort, not an authorization for military vaping promotion or a ban on vape products.
Jul.28
Philippines Customs Seizes PHP11.68 Billion($200 Million) in Illegal Tobacco and Vapes in First Seven Months of 2026
Philippines Customs Seizes PHP11.68 Billion($200 Million) in Illegal Tobacco and Vapes in First Seven Months of 2026
Philippines Customs data showed that illegal cigarettes and vape products seized during the first seven months of 2026 were valued at about PHP11.68 billion, exceeding the PHP2.516 billion recorded for the full year of 2025. The figures were disclosed by a Bureau of Customs official during a House Committee on Ways and Means hearing on tobacco excise tax reforms. Vape-related seizures were valued at about PHP1.65 billion, with most cases recorded at the Manila International Container Port. Customs officials said enforcement against illicit tobacco trade would continue.
Aug.26
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
Australia-China Operation Dismantles Tobacco Smuggling Network: 112 Containers, 60 Arrests and A$92 Million in Illicit Tobacco
Australia-China Operation Dismantles Tobacco Smuggling Network: 112 Containers, 60 Arrests and A$92 Million in Illicit Tobacco
According to The Maritime Executive on August 19, 2026, the Australian Border Force (ABF) and China’s Anti-Smuggling Bureau of General Administration of China Customs worked together to dismantle an international illicit tobacco smuggling network targeting Australia. According to information released by ABF on August 20, sustained information sharing and cooperation led to investigations into 112 shipping containers, with 91 found to contain illicit tobacco. Authorities seized more than 60 million cigarettes and 60 kilograms of loose-leaf tobacco, representing more than A$92 million in unpaid duties. More than 60 people suspected of involvement in the network were arrested in China.
Aug.20
BAT New Categories Revenue Rises 18% in H1 2026 as Broad Portfolio Offers More Ways to Win—and Lose
BAT New Categories Revenue Rises 18% in H1 2026 as Broad Portfolio Offers More Ways to Win—and Lose
British American Tobacco’s New Category revenue rose 18% at constant rates in the first half of 2026. Nicotine-pouch brand Velo expanded rapidly, while Vuse recovered as U.S. enforcement against illicit e-vapor products strengthened. Heated-tobacco platform glo remained under pressure, and cigarettes continued to provide most of the group’s profit and cash. Compared with PMI and JT, BAT has more routes to growth—but also greater regulatory, investment and execution risks across its broader portfolio.
BAT
Jul.30