The FDA Criticised for not Enforcing The Synthetic Nicotine Ban

Industry InsightRegulations
Jul.18.2022
After being criticised for not enforcing the synthetic nicotine ban, the FDA started sending warnings to non-authorized manufacturers and retailers of the products.

On July 13th the FDA announced that it sent two warning letters to manufacturers marketing non-authorized synthetic nicotine products and over 100 warning letters to retailers selling synthetic nicotine products to minors.

The FDA Criticised for not Enforcing The Synthetic Nicotine Ban

 

Synthetic products, which are often sold in fruity flavors and are popular with teens, have previously been exempt from FDA regulations because they are made from nicotine made in a lab, rather than nicotine extracted from tobacco leaf.

However, following a legislation enacted on March 15th, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been given the authority to regulate tobacco products containing nicotine from any source. This has led to a ban on synthetic nicotine.

 

After the passing of the synthetic nicotine ban, the Vapor Trade Association (VTA) immediately began working on a strategy to ensure a viable path for companies which are selling the products. Moreover, the VTA’s Board of Directors and members met with the FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) to discuss the ban.

 

The FDA personnel in attendance included over 35 senior leaders, representing seven different offices inside CTP. The VTA held presentations by three Ph.D’s in Organic Chemistry and Physical Analytical Chemistry, in order to frame critical scientific and public policy issues that we believe had not previously been presented to or considered by the FDA.

 

Synthetic nicotine manufacturers had to submit premarket applications by May 14th

 

The March legislation required synthetic nicotine manufacturers to submit premarket applications by May 14, 2022, and any brand which had not submitted these documents would be considered illegal. However, until earlier this week this had never been enforced by the FDA.

 

Naturally this led to the agency being heavily criticised. In a letter, which cited STAT’s reporting on the agency’s lack of action, Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), said that the FDA “appears to be on the brink of failing yet again at protecting our nation’s children.”

 

Meanwhile, on July 13th the FDA announced that it sent two warning letters to manufacturers marketing non-authorized synthetic nicotine products and over 100 warning letters to retailers who sold synthetic nicotine products to minors.

 

The content excerpted or reproduced in this article comes from a third-party, and the copyright belongs to the original media and author. If any infringement is found, please contact us to delete it. Any entity or individual wishing to forward the information, please contact the author and refrain from forwarding directly from here.

 

 

Disposable Vape Ban Shifts Purchasing Formats as UK Vape Volume Falls 10.3%
Disposable Vape Ban Shifts Purchasing Formats as UK Vape Volume Falls 10.3%
Data from convenience insight agency Talysis shows that the value of tobacco, vapes and smoking alternatives in the independent convenience sector fell by 4.4% in the first quarter of 2026, while volume fell by 7.8%. The vaping subcategory declined by 3.9% in value and 10.3% in volume over the same period. Talysis said the impact of the disposable vape ban continues to pressure turnover and footfall.
May.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York Nicotine Pouch Tax Moves Forward as Critics Question Public Health Impact
New York Nicotine Pouch Tax Moves Forward as Critics Question Public Health Impact
New York Governor Kathy Hochul included in her FY 2027 budget proposal a plan to impose the same 75% wholesale tax on nicotine pouches such as Zyn that applies to cigarettes. The measure is expected to raise USD 18 million in FY 2027 and USD 44 million in FY 2028 after full implementation.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban
Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban
France’s ban on oral nicotine pouches has triggered an immediate response in Sweden. Swedish Minister for Foreign Trade Benjamin Dousa said Sweden had mobilized strongly against the ban and argued that it constitutes a clear obstacle to the free movement of goods within the EU single market. Swedish officials say the measure affects a strategically important domestic industry and conflicts with Sweden’s harm-reduction approach to public health.
Apr.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Australia’s Tasmania Tables New Bill to Strengthen Crackdown on Illicit Tobacco and Vapes
Australia’s Tasmania Tables New Bill to Strengthen Crackdown on Illicit Tobacco and Vapes
The Tasmanian government has tabled the Public Health Amendment (Prohibited Tobacco and Other Products) Bill 2026 in Parliament, proposing new offences, higher penalties and stronger enforcement powers to crack down on illicit tobacco and vaping products.
Mar.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Portugal and Other Countries Submit Objections in Brussels Over UK Smoke-Free Generation Bill
Portugal and Other Countries Submit Objections in Brussels Over UK Smoke-Free Generation Bill
Portugal is among the countries opposing the UK Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which would ban tobacco sales to people born on or after Jan. 1, 2009. According to the report, Portugal, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Slovakia and Romania have submitted reasoned opinions and formal observations to Brussels, arguing that the bill breaches post-Brexit arrangements including the Windsor Framework.
Apr.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai