UK Smoking Rates at Historic Low as E-Cigarette Use Increases

Dec.07.2022
UK Smoking Rates at Historic Low as E-Cigarette Use Increases
Smoking in the UK hit an all-time low in 2021, but more people are turning to e-cigarettes, according to data.

New data shows that the number of smokers in the UK reached a historic low last year, but more people are using e-cigarettes.


According to data from the UK's National Statistics Office, approximately 13.3% of people aged 18 or older smoked in 2021, which is lower than the 14.0% reported in 2020.


However, among people aged 16 and above, 7.7% of them reported using e-cigarettes, compared to 6.4% in 2020.


The first record from the UK National Statistics Office about smoking was in 2011, which found that 20.2% of people had smoked at some point.


The UK's National Statistics Office has stated that the latest data represents a "statistically significant" decrease.


Is vaping a risk-free choice? Should disposable e-cigarettes be banned? James Tucker, who works in data analysis for the UK's Office for National Statistics' social care and health department, suggests that the decrease in smokers may partly be due to more people turning to e-cigarettes.


He said, "This is the lowest current smoking rate since 2011, when we began documenting smoking rates through the annual Population Survey (APS).


According to the UK's National Statistics Office, electronic cigarettes and other vaping devices have played a "significant role" in reducing the number of smokers in the UK.


According to the report, the use of electronic cigarettes is highest among current smokers, at 25.3%, followed by former smokers at 15.0%. Only 1.5% of those who have never smoked reported using e-cigarettes.


However, it added that electronic cigarettes may not be the only factor contributing to the decline in smoking. (Translated from Chinese)


This may also be due to increased public awareness campaigns and the implementation of smoke-free policies in places such as bars and offices.


The government's tobacco control program aims to reduce smoking rates among adults in England to 12% or lower by the end of 2022.


According to the UK's National Statistics Office, Scotland currently has the highest proportion of smokers in the country for 2021 at 14.8%, while England has the lowest at 13.0%.


In other locations, Wales and Northern Ireland have reported respective current smoking rates of 14.1% and 13.8%.


By 2021, men are more likely to be current smokers in the UK with a smoking rate of 15.1% compared to women's rate of 11.5%.


Currently, the age group with the most smokers is 25 to 34 years old, accounting for 15.8%, while the lowest is people aged 65 and over, at 8%.


According to the UK's Office for National Statistics, those who are not qualified are currently more likely to smoke, at a rate of 28.2%, compared to those with a degree or equivalent educational qualifications, who have a smoking rate of 6.6%.


According to the NHS website, while electronic cigarettes are not without some risk, that risk is lower than that of traditional cigarettes. However, the long-term effects of using electronic cigarettes have yet to be fully understood.


Selling e-cigarettes to those under the age of 18 is illegal.


2FIRSTS will continue to report on this topic and provide updates on our mobile app, 2FIRSTSAPP. Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
A new Swedish study found oral mucosal lesions in 79% of examined nicotine pouch users and 89% of tobacco-derived snus users, with different tissue-response patterns between the two categories. For manufacturers and regulators, the findings shift attention toward product formulation, flavouring, pouch materials and local oral exposure, not only whether a product contains tobacco. The study found no higher prevalence of caries or periodontal disease, but it could not establish causality, long-term outcomes or differences between individual products or designs.
Special Report
Jul.27
Senate Democrat Wyden Probes Trump Administration Vape Policy Shift, Seeks Records From HHS and Reynolds American
Senate Democrat Wyden Probes Trump Administration Vape Policy Shift, Seeks Records From HHS and Reynolds American
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, the Democratic ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, has launched an investigation into flavored vape policy changes and requested records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Reynolds American and Botanic Tonics. The investigation focuses on a timeline involving Reynolds American’s $5 million donation to MAGA Inc. in April 2026 and subsequent vape policy developments. Wyden said the review aims to examine potential links between political donations, corporate communications and government decisions. The investigation does not represent a finding of wrongdoing.
Innovation
Aug.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Special Report|AIR H1 Revenue Rises 3.7% as Shisha Volumes Fall 9%, Testing Its Shift Beyond Traditional Hookah
Special Report|AIR H1 Revenue Rises 3.7% as Shisha Volumes Fall 9%, Testing Its Shift Beyond Traditional Hookah
AIR’s first half-year results as a listed company offer a new test of how far a traditional hookah business can transform. H1 2026 revenue rose 3.7%, even as Flavored Shisha Molasses shipments fell 9%, with pricing and mix supporting growth. Traditional shisha still generates almost all revenue, while OOKA, Crown Switch, Greentank and U.S. regulatory spending point to accelerating diversification. The next test is whether those investments can become a second business of meaningful scale and profitability.
Capital Markets
Aug.21
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
A U.S. appeals court ruled that British American Tobacco (BAT) must continue facing a consumer class action lawsuit over cigarette labels. The ruling allows the case to proceed but does not determine that BAT violated the law or is liable for damages. The case highlights ongoing legal risks facing major tobacco companies related to product labeling, consumer disclosures and product liability claims.
Jul.31