US Officials to Correct Misinformation on Nicotine E-Cigarettes

Dec.13.2022
US Officials to Correct Misinformation on Nicotine E-Cigarettes
US tobacco researchers ask CDC for correct information on e-cigarettes, with health officials correcting misleading public health statements.

Tobacco researchers in the United States have consulted with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The US Secretary of Health will address some incorrect information released by public health agencies regarding nicotine e-cigarettes.


US Health Secretary Vivek Murthy has recently launched an initiative to reduce the spread of health misinformation in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. As part of this effort, he has advised public health institutions such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to stop promoting inaccurate information about electronic cigarettes. For instance, the CDC had disseminated misleading information about the lung injuries caused by e-cigarettes in 2019 (EVALI), and the Health Secretary's report about youth e-cigarette use in 2016 had wrongly claimed that nicotine e-cigarettes were the most commonly used among young people.


The call was made in an editorial published in the Addiction journal. It was co-written by Michael Pesko, a health economist at Georgia State University, along with colleagues from Harvard Medical School, Pennsylvania State University, the Medical University of South Carolina and the University of Michigan. Tom Miller, the former chairman of the Truth Initiative board and Iowa's attorney general, was also a co-author.


The author of the editorial explained that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) named the lung injury of 2019 related to the usage of e-cigarettes as "EVALI" and refused to change the name, which led to widespread attention and misunderstanding from the public and scientific community about the cause of the disease.


It has been reported that the current director of the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products, Brian King, coined the term "EVALI." King is a staunch opponent of nicotine e-cigarettes and was formerly an employee in the smoking and health office at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


The name EVALI has been indirectly responsible for the deaths of 68 people and has sent thousands to hospital, as they were not given a clear warning by public health officials about the risks associated with unregulated electronic cigarettes containing THC oil.


According to the author, all evidence indicates that the illegal tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) e-cigarettes contaminated with vitamin E acetate are the main risk factor for illness, but there is no research indicating any chemicals found in nicotine e-cigarettes. Vitamin E acetate is insoluble in nicotine e-liquid and has never been detected in nicotine e-cigarettes.


The author suggests that despite evidence to the contrary, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) continues to include e-cigarettes in the EVALI designation. This naming convention has had an impact on news reporting and has contributed to a distorted belief among consumers that using nicotine e-cigarettes is risky.


In 2021, the same author officially requested that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention trace a change in the name "EVALI," removing "e-cigarette" from the name and adding "adult THC.


2FIRSTS will continue to report on this topic, with further updates available on the "2FIRSTS APP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

IQOS Enters Kantar BrandZ Global Top 100 for First Time, Valued at $36.6 Billion and Ranked No. 74
IQOS Enters Kantar BrandZ Global Top 100 for First Time, Valued at $36.6 Billion and Ranked No. 74
Philip Morris International’s IQOS has entered the Kantar BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands for the first time, ranking No. 74 with a brand value of $36.634 billion and becoming one of only three newcomers to the 2026 ranking. Kantar said the combined value of the Global Top 100 reached $13.1 trillion, up 22% year on year, while the threshold for entry rose to a record high. PMI says IQOS has more than 35 million users worldwide and surpassed $10 billion in annual net revenues within a decade of launch.
Sep.03
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
The FDA has authorized four additional on! nicotine pouches, bringing the U.S. total to 30. The decision marks another outcome of the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot, whose communication and review practices are now being applied more broadly across the category. It also extends Helix’s authorized portfolio from on! PLUS to the earlier on! line. Yet all FDA-authorized nicotine pouches still come from subsidiaries of PMI or Altria, underscoring how concentrated U.S. regulatory access remains.
Aug.05
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
A Quebec Superior Court has allowed a class action lawsuit against Juul Labs and Altria Group related to vaping products to proceed, involving allegations concerning marketing practices, youth exposure and corporate responsibility. The ruling only allows the case to move forward and does not represent a finding that Juul or Altria are legally liable. The case highlights continued legal risks facing vape companies regarding product marketing, youth protection and corporate accountability.
Jul.28
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
A new Swedish study found oral mucosal lesions in 79% of examined nicotine pouch users and 89% of tobacco-derived snus users, with different tissue-response patterns between the two categories. For manufacturers and regulators, the findings shift attention toward product formulation, flavouring, pouch materials and local oral exposure, not only whether a product contains tobacco. The study found no higher prevalence of caries or periodontal disease, but it could not establish causality, long-term outcomes or differences between individual products or designs.
Special Report
Jul.27
Smoore Wins Three Heated Device Supply Lots in China Tobacco Jiangsu’s Overseas Market Project Covering Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia
Smoore Wins Three Heated Device Supply Lots in China Tobacco Jiangsu’s Overseas Market Project Covering Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia
China Tobacco Jiangsu Industrial Co., Ltd. (JSIC) has completed its 2026-2028 heated device procurement project, with Shenzhen Smoore Technology Limited securing final supply contracts for three lots: U1, C1 and C2. The project was launched through a public tender in June 2026 to support overseas markets and involved heated tobacco devices carrying JSIC’s “iRod” trademark. Candidate supplier results published on July 13 showed Smoore ranked first for the three awarded lots, while Shenzhen Yunxi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Bodi Technology Development Co., Ltd. participated in the bidding process.
Aug.03
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10