FDA Issues Civil Penalty Notices to 21 Retailers Selling Unauthorized Esco Bars

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.31.2024
FDA Issues Civil Penalty Notices to 21 Retailers Selling Unauthorized Esco Bars
The FDA has issued civil fines to 21 retailers for selling unauthorized Esco Barse-cigarettes, popular among young people.

On January 30, in Pacific Standard Time, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Tobacco News Center released a statement announcing that civil penalty notices have been issued to 21 physical retailers for selling unauthorized Esco Barse-cigarettes, a popular brand among young people. Earlier, the FDA had sent warning letters to each retailer accusing them of selling unauthorized tobacco products. However, subsequent inspections revealed that these retailers failed to rectify their non-compliant actions, leading the agency to seek penalties of up to $20,678 for each retailer.

 

Today, the FDA announced its first ever civil penalties against the unauthorized sale of Esco Bars e-cigarettes, following complaints. Data indicates that these products are attractive to American teenagers. According to the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey, Esco Bars is the second most popular brand among adolescent e-cigarette users. Approximately one-fifth of middle and high school students who have used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days reported using Esco Bars during that period.

 

Dr. Brian King, director of the FDA Center for Tobacco Products, has stated that these retailers have been warned about the potential consequences if they continue to sell unauthorized e-cigarettes. They were supposed to responsibly address their violations, but they have chosen not to do so and must now face the repercussions of their decision. The FDA will not stand idly by and tolerate non-compliance with the law.

 

Currently, $20,678 is the maximum civil penalty amount that the FDA can seek from each retailer for a single violation, which aligns with similar fines sought by the FDA in September, November, and December 2023 for the sale of unauthorized Elf Bar products. Retailers have the option to pay the fine, reach a settlement agreement based on mitigating factors, request an extension for their defense, or present a defense and request a hearing. Retailers who fail to take action within 30 days of receiving a complaint will face default orders, resulting in full penalties being imposed.

 

Today's civil fines action is just the latest move by the FDA in its efforts to rid the entire supply chain of unauthorized e-cigarettes, especially those popular among young people. As of January 30, 2024, the FDA has issued over 440 warning letters and 88 civil penalty notices to retailers, including brick-and-mortar stores and online retailers, accusing them of selling unauthorized tobacco products. In addition to actions involving retailers, the FDA has also sent warning letters to over 660 companies for illegal manufacturing and/or distribution of unauthorized novel tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. The agency has also filed civil penalty complaints against 48 e-cigarette companies, accusing them of manufacturing unauthorized products, and has sought injunctions against seven unauthorized e-cigarette product manufacturers in coordination with the U.S. Department of Justice.

 

The FDA will continue its compliance and enforcement actions against the manufacturing, distribution, importation, or sale of unauthorized e-cigarette products, including imposing civil penalties on retailers found in violation of the law. As of now, the FDA has authorized 23 tobacco-flavored e-cigarette products and devices, which are the only legally sold e-cigarette products in the United States. Selling or distributing e-cigarettes without FDA market authorization is a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19
Canada Considers Easing Pharmacy-Only Nicotine Pouch Sales Rules, Potentially Reopening Convenience Store Channel
Canada Considers Easing Pharmacy-Only Nicotine Pouch Sales Rules, Potentially Reopening Convenience Store Channel
Canada's federal government is considering changes to current restrictions on where nicotine pouches can be sold, potentially allowing authorized products to return to convenience stores and other general retail channels, although no decision has been made. Since 2024, emerging nicotine replacement therapy products such as nicotine pouches have been largely restricted to behind-the-counter pharmacy sales. Health Canada, meanwhile, continues to recall unauthorized and higher-strength nicotine pouches, indicating that the current discussion concerns retail access for authorized products rather than a broad relaxation of nicotine pouch regulation.
Sep.14
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
A commentary published in the international open-access, peer-reviewed Harm Reduction Journal argues that randomized controlled trials remain central to evaluating smoking cessation efficacy but cannot alone capture real-world uptake, complete switching, longer-term use and population impact of non-combustible nicotine products such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and nicotine pouches. The authors frame impact as “reach × efficacy” and call for real-world evidence to complement RCTs. Three days after publication, the FDA authorized three JUUL2 products and highlighted complete switching among adult smokers in explaining its decision, providing a timely regulatory backdrop to the debate.
Sep.08
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Philip Morris Malaysia Again Meets Religious Authority Over Cigarette Alternatives as Perlis Mufti Responds on Halal Criteria
Philip Morris Malaysia Again Meets Religious Authority Over Cigarette Alternatives as Perlis Mufti Responds on Halal Criteria
Philip Morris Malaysia Managing Director Naeem Shahab Khan met Perlis Mufti Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin on September 17 and presented the company's shift from conventional cigarettes toward alternative products. The mufti said a product could be considered halal if it is clean, its side effects are not harmful or can be controlled, and it does not involve excessive waste. His remarks did not mention IQOS or any other specific PMI product and did not amount to a new product-specific religious ruling. It was at least the second publicly reported engagement between Philip Morris Malaysia and a Malaysian religious institution over cigarette alternatives within six months.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
DOJO officially launched the BLAST7K Fresh on September 17, 2026, introducing a UK-market prefilled pod product with 6ml of e-liquid and a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 7,000 puffs. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, the INSTA-JUICED structure and COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology, while retaining compatibility with existing BLAST pods. The launch comes less than two weeks before the UK's Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1. At the new duty rate, 6ml of vaping liquid would correspond to £1.32 in VPD. DOJO has not stated that the product's 6ml format was designed in response to the new duty.
Sep.20