FDA Issues Civil Penalty Notices to 21 Retailers Selling Unauthorized Esco Bars

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.31.2024
FDA Issues Civil Penalty Notices to 21 Retailers Selling Unauthorized Esco Bars
The FDA has issued civil fines to 21 retailers for selling unauthorized Esco Barse-cigarettes, popular among young people.

On January 30, in Pacific Standard Time, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Tobacco News Center released a statement announcing that civil penalty notices have been issued to 21 physical retailers for selling unauthorized Esco Barse-cigarettes, a popular brand among young people. Earlier, the FDA had sent warning letters to each retailer accusing them of selling unauthorized tobacco products. However, subsequent inspections revealed that these retailers failed to rectify their non-compliant actions, leading the agency to seek penalties of up to $20,678 for each retailer.

 

Today, the FDA announced its first ever civil penalties against the unauthorized sale of Esco Bars e-cigarettes, following complaints. Data indicates that these products are attractive to American teenagers. According to the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey, Esco Bars is the second most popular brand among adolescent e-cigarette users. Approximately one-fifth of middle and high school students who have used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days reported using Esco Bars during that period.

 

Dr. Brian King, director of the FDA Center for Tobacco Products, has stated that these retailers have been warned about the potential consequences if they continue to sell unauthorized e-cigarettes. They were supposed to responsibly address their violations, but they have chosen not to do so and must now face the repercussions of their decision. The FDA will not stand idly by and tolerate non-compliance with the law.

 

Currently, $20,678 is the maximum civil penalty amount that the FDA can seek from each retailer for a single violation, which aligns with similar fines sought by the FDA in September, November, and December 2023 for the sale of unauthorized Elf Bar products. Retailers have the option to pay the fine, reach a settlement agreement based on mitigating factors, request an extension for their defense, or present a defense and request a hearing. Retailers who fail to take action within 30 days of receiving a complaint will face default orders, resulting in full penalties being imposed.

 

Today's civil fines action is just the latest move by the FDA in its efforts to rid the entire supply chain of unauthorized e-cigarettes, especially those popular among young people. As of January 30, 2024, the FDA has issued over 440 warning letters and 88 civil penalty notices to retailers, including brick-and-mortar stores and online retailers, accusing them of selling unauthorized tobacco products. In addition to actions involving retailers, the FDA has also sent warning letters to over 660 companies for illegal manufacturing and/or distribution of unauthorized novel tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. The agency has also filed civil penalty complaints against 48 e-cigarette companies, accusing them of manufacturing unauthorized products, and has sought injunctions against seven unauthorized e-cigarette product manufacturers in coordination with the U.S. Department of Justice.

 

The FDA will continue its compliance and enforcement actions against the manufacturing, distribution, importation, or sale of unauthorized e-cigarette products, including imposing civil penalties on retailers found in violation of the law. As of now, the FDA has authorized 23 tobacco-flavored e-cigarette products and devices, which are the only legally sold e-cigarette products in the United States. Selling or distributing e-cigarettes without FDA market authorization is a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Court Rules Zyn Marketing Dispute Can Proceed, Rejects Philip Morris International’s Bid to Dismiss
U.S. Court Rules Zyn Marketing Dispute Can Proceed, Rejects Philip Morris International’s Bid to Dismiss
A U.S. federal court in Florida denied Philip Morris International and its subsidiaries’ motion to dismiss, allowing consumers to proceed with claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act alleging that Zyn nicotine pouches’ “tobacco-free” marketing is misleading. The court held that the allegations do not amount to a fraud claim and may move forward to the merits stage.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
AIR’s Shisha Brand Al Fakher Launches New Pod-Based Vape in Germany, Touting Non-Ceramic Atomization Technology
AIR’s Shisha Brand Al Fakher Launches New Pod-Based Vape in Germany, Touting Non-Ceramic Atomization Technology
AIR’s shisha brand Al Fakher has launched its rechargeable pod-based vape Crown Switch in Germany, featuring Coldstream technology and claiming low-temperature vaporization without ceramic or metal heating elements. The device is now available on shisha-world, while AIR is simultaneously pushing ahead with its plan to go public on Nasdaq via a SPAC merger.
Nov.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Putin Supports Full Russia-Wide Vape Sales Ban
Putin Supports Full Russia-Wide Vape Sales Ban
Russian President Vladimir Putin gave his backing to a nationwide sales ban on vapes during a visit to Samara and stressed that “it’s not only such a decision that is important, but also the corresponding work among youth.”
Nov.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Opinion | Samrat Chowdhery: Tobacco Price Elasticity—A Convenient Myth?
Opinion | Samrat Chowdhery: Tobacco Price Elasticity—A Convenient Myth?
This opinion piece, submitted by Samrat Chowdhery to 2Firsts, challenges the logic of tobacco price elasticity. It argues that high taxes often harm vulnerable populations and fuel illicit markets rather than reducing smoking.
Oct.21
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
According to Law360, VPR Brands and iMiracle have filed a joint notice in federal court in Florida stating that they have signed a settlement term sheet and plan to finalize a global settlement within 30 days that would resolve multiple lawsuits. The dispute, which began in 2022 and centers on the “Elf” trademark, has involved injunctions, counterclaims and a key ruling by the Federal Circuit overturning a lower court’s order.
Dec.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Illegal Disposable Vapes Still Sold in Nottingham Six Months After UK Ban: LBC Investigation
Illegal Disposable Vapes Still Sold in Nottingham Six Months After UK Ban: LBC Investigation
According to LBC, a follow-up investigation in Nottingham found that four out of 14 shops visited still sold illegal disposable vapes, six months after the UK Government’s ban took effect. Although fewer retailers appeared to be offering banned products compared with an earlier visit, illegal vapes remain available despite ongoing enforcement efforts.
Dec.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai