FDA Warns Five Companies for Illegal Sale of CBD Products

Nov.23.2022
FDA Warns Five Companies for Illegal Sale of CBD Products
The FDA warns five companies for illegally selling CBD products that may be confused with traditional foods and beverages.

The US Food and Drug Administration issued warning letters today to five companies illegally selling products containing cannabidiol (CBD).


Several companies have been accused of selling products containing CBD. The FDA has stated that some consumers may confuse these products with traditional food and beverages that do not contain CBD, which could lead to unintended or excessive consumption of CBD.


The FDA expressed concern in a press release about CBD-containing products that appeal to children, such as gummies, hard candies, and cookies.


On November 11th, BrandsNaturally Infused LLC, Newhere Inc. dba CBDFX, Infusionz LLC, and CBD American Shaman, LLC, all received warning letters from an undisclosed sender.


According to the agency, the FDA has yet to find sufficient information to determine how much CBD can be consumed and for how long before it causes harm.


The organization stated that this is particularly important for vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant women. People should be aware of the potential risks associated with using CBD products.


The warning letter also outlined other violations of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, including some companies illegally selling CBD products that claim to cure, alleviate, treat, or prevent various diseases without approval and adding CBD to animal food, such as pet snacks.


The FDA has required these companies to respond within 15 business days, outlining how they plan to address the issues described in the warning letter, or providing reasoning and supporting information for why they believe their products are not in violation of the law," the agency wrote. "Failing to promptly and adequately address noncompliance may result in legal action, including product seizure and/or injunction.


Statement:


This article is compiled from information from third-party sources and is only intended for industry professionals for learning and exchange purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is intended solely for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in translation skills, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong/Macao/Taiwan-related, and foreign statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to remove it.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Brazil’s federal prosecutors sue for strict e-cigarette rules, urging regulation over a “paper ban”
Brazil’s federal prosecutors sue for strict e-cigarette rules, urging regulation over a “paper ban”
Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPF) has filed a public civil action seeking to compel the federal government and Anvisa to establish a strict, enforceable regulatory framework for electronic smoking devices, replacing the current blanket ban. The lawsuit calls for mandatory product registration, nicotine caps, bans on youth-targeted advertising, and clear health warnings on packaging, and demands a national consumption report and an implementation timetable within 90 days.
Jan.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Phnom Penh “Mystery House” raided: authorities seize over 300,000 smoking devices and related items
Phnom Penh “Mystery House” raided: authorities seize over 300,000 smoking devices and related items
A Phnom Penh venue selling electronic smoking devices — nicknamed the “Mystery House” — was raided on the night of January 15, 2026, with authorities seizing over 300,000 items and arresting the 58-year-old owner. Seized evidence included smoking machines, cigarette heads, bottles of vape juice and marijuana grinding machines.
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Hampshire Trading Standards Seizes £138,000 Worth of Illegal Vapes and Tobacco in 2025
Hampshire Trading Standards Seizes £138,000 Worth of Illegal Vapes and Tobacco in 2025
According to Hampshire County Council, its Trading Standards team confiscated 116,000 illegal vape and tobacco products in 2025, worth an estimated £138,000 — a record annual haul.
Feb.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT’s Product Strategy Reset: A Structural Analysis of Its Post-FY2025 Competitive Architecture
BAT’s Product Strategy Reset: A Structural Analysis of Its Post-FY2025 Competitive Architecture
Drawing on BAT’s FY2025 results and earnings call, 2Firsts finds the company shifting from category expansion to competitive entrenchment across Vapour, Modern Oral, Heated Products and Combustibles. The strategy centers on connected devices, geographic customization and portfolio tiering. While structurally coherent, financial returns depend on consistent regulatory enforcement against illicit competitors, making policy execution a key variable for 2026 performance.
Feb.12
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
A Colorado vape industry trade group says Denver’s voter-approved flavored tobacco sales ban is unconstitutional and too vague to enforce. The group is asking a state court for a permanent injunction blocking enforcement of Ordinance 24-1765 and for a declaration allowing flavored tobacco and vape sales, citing state constitutional vagueness concerns and multiple U.S. constitutional issues.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Azerbaijan’s Milli Majlis to hold public hearings on e-cigarette use in the 2026 spring session
Azerbaijan’s Milli Majlis to hold public hearings on e-cigarette use in the 2026 spring session
Azerbaijan’s Milli Majlis will hold public hearings regarding the use of e-cigarettes. The topic has been included in the 2026 spring session work plan of the Milli Majlis Committee on Agrarian Policy. During the spring session, the committee plans to convene a public hearing titled “Health is our goal: an end to e-cigarettes.”
Jan.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai