FDA Warns Five Companies for Illegal Sale of CBD Products

Nov.23.2022
FDA Warns Five Companies for Illegal Sale of CBD Products
The FDA warns five companies for illegally selling CBD products that may be confused with traditional foods and beverages.

The US Food and Drug Administration issued warning letters today to five companies illegally selling products containing cannabidiol (CBD).


Several companies have been accused of selling products containing CBD. The FDA has stated that some consumers may confuse these products with traditional food and beverages that do not contain CBD, which could lead to unintended or excessive consumption of CBD.


The FDA expressed concern in a press release about CBD-containing products that appeal to children, such as gummies, hard candies, and cookies.


On November 11th, BrandsNaturally Infused LLC, Newhere Inc. dba CBDFX, Infusionz LLC, and CBD American Shaman, LLC, all received warning letters from an undisclosed sender.


According to the agency, the FDA has yet to find sufficient information to determine how much CBD can be consumed and for how long before it causes harm.


The organization stated that this is particularly important for vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant women. People should be aware of the potential risks associated with using CBD products.


The warning letter also outlined other violations of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, including some companies illegally selling CBD products that claim to cure, alleviate, treat, or prevent various diseases without approval and adding CBD to animal food, such as pet snacks.


The FDA has required these companies to respond within 15 business days, outlining how they plan to address the issues described in the warning letter, or providing reasoning and supporting information for why they believe their products are not in violation of the law," the agency wrote. "Failing to promptly and adequately address noncompliance may result in legal action, including product seizure and/or injunction.


Statement:


This article is compiled from information from third-party sources and is only intended for industry professionals for learning and exchange purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is intended solely for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in translation skills, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong/Macao/Taiwan-related, and foreign statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to remove it.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

From Heating Blades to Heating Paper? CTHB Patent Points to Microwave Heated Tobacco Design
From Heating Blades to Heating Paper? CTHB Patent Points to Microwave Heated Tobacco Design
According to China’s patent office records, a patent owned by China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Corporation (CTHB) for “cigarette paper and a cigarette for microwave heating” was granted on May 19, 2026. The patent describes cigarette paper with an outer wrapping layer, a heating layer, and an isolation heat-conducting layer, allowing it to absorb microwave energy, convert it to heat, and transfer that heat to the aerosol-generating substrate.
Jun.10
One Nation Proposes 50% Tobacco Excise Cut as Australia’s Illicit Market Expands
One Nation Proposes 50% Tobacco Excise Cut as Australia’s Illicit Market Expands
Australian One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has proposed cutting tobacco excise by 50% and freezing indexation until June 30, 2028, in a bid to lower legal cigarette prices and reduce the price advantage of the illicit tobacco market.
Jun.18
Sweden Becomes First EU Country to Reach Smoke-Free Status as Daily Smoking Falls to 4.8%
Sweden Becomes First EU Country to Reach Smoke-Free Status as Daily Smoking Falls to 4.8%
According to the latest CAN report and multiple media reports, Sweden’s daily smoking rate fell to 4.8% in 2025, below the commonly used 5% smoke-free threshold, making it the first EU country to reach that benchmark.
News
Jun.05
Italy Fines PMI €7 Million Over Misleading ‘Smoke-Free Future’ Marketing Claims
Italy Fines PMI €7 Million Over Misleading ‘Smoke-Free Future’ Marketing Claims
Italy’s Competition and Market Authority (AGCM) has fined Philip Morris Italia €7 million, finding that the company’s use of “smoke-free future” and related claims in promoting products such as IQOS, VEEV and ZYN could mislead consumers.
Jun.16
China Tobacco Yunnan Patent Describes Cigar Flavor Granules With Encapsulation Rate Above 77%
China Tobacco Yunnan Patent Describes Cigar Flavor Granules With Encapsulation Rate Above 77%
According to public records from China’s National Intellectual Property Administration, a patent application filed by China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd. for “cigar flavor granules” was published on May 12, 2026. The filing proposes purifying an ethanol extract of cigar tobacco leaves using LX-8 macroporous resin, followed by encapsulation with maltodextrin and sucrose fatty acid ester to improve smoking comfort, reduce dryness and enhance aroma release stability in reconstituted tobacco.
Jun.10
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Russia’s regional vape-ban model is facing early legal and political tests, as Perm Krai moves ahead before federal legislation is fully adopted. The case highlights uncertainty over regional authority, concerns from business groups about market fragmentation, and the risk that pressure against regional bans could revive calls for a stricter nationwide prohibition.
Industry Insight
May.28