FDA Warns Five Companies for Illegal Sale of CBD Products

Nov.23.2022
FDA Warns Five Companies for Illegal Sale of CBD Products
The FDA warns five companies for illegally selling CBD products that may be confused with traditional foods and beverages.

The US Food and Drug Administration issued warning letters today to five companies illegally selling products containing cannabidiol (CBD).


Several companies have been accused of selling products containing CBD. The FDA has stated that some consumers may confuse these products with traditional food and beverages that do not contain CBD, which could lead to unintended or excessive consumption of CBD.


The FDA expressed concern in a press release about CBD-containing products that appeal to children, such as gummies, hard candies, and cookies.


On November 11th, BrandsNaturally Infused LLC, Newhere Inc. dba CBDFX, Infusionz LLC, and CBD American Shaman, LLC, all received warning letters from an undisclosed sender.


According to the agency, the FDA has yet to find sufficient information to determine how much CBD can be consumed and for how long before it causes harm.


The organization stated that this is particularly important for vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant women. People should be aware of the potential risks associated with using CBD products.


The warning letter also outlined other violations of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, including some companies illegally selling CBD products that claim to cure, alleviate, treat, or prevent various diseases without approval and adding CBD to animal food, such as pet snacks.


The FDA has required these companies to respond within 15 business days, outlining how they plan to address the issues described in the warning letter, or providing reasoning and supporting information for why they believe their products are not in violation of the law," the agency wrote. "Failing to promptly and adequately address noncompliance may result in legal action, including product seizure and/or injunction.


Statement:


This article is compiled from information from third-party sources and is only intended for industry professionals for learning and exchange purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is intended solely for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in translation skills, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong/Macao/Taiwan-related, and foreign statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to remove it.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Vietnam Decree 371: vaping and heated tobacco use fined up to $190
Vietnam Decree 371: vaping and heated tobacco use fined up to $190
Vietnam’s Government Decree 371, effective December 31, 2025, stipulates that users of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products will be fined VND 3–5 million (about $114–$190) and required to destroy the products. The decree also provides that individuals who allow use at premises they own or manage will be fined VND 5–10 million (about $190–$380), with fines doubled for organizations.
Jan.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
San Francisco reaches $1 million settlement with nicotine pouch retailer Lucy Goods
San Francisco reaches $1 million settlement with nicotine pouch retailer Lucy Goods
In the United States, California, San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu announced a $1 million settlement requiring online tobacco retailer Lucy Goods, Inc. to stop shipping illegal tobacco products into San Francisco.
Jan.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Morocco Aligns Cigarette Pricing Structure with New 2026 Tax Adjustment
Morocco Aligns Cigarette Pricing Structure with New 2026 Tax Adjustment
Morocco will raise retail cigarette prices by 1–2 dirhams (≈ US$ 0.10–0.20) per pack starting January 1, 2026, as part of the final phase of its tobacco tax reform. The adjustment mainly affects value-category cigarette brands; premiums remain largely unchanged.
Dec.01
Vietnam Drafts Administrative Penalties for E-Cigarette Use, Setting Fines up to USD 380
Vietnam Drafts Administrative Penalties for E-Cigarette Use, Setting Fines up to USD 380
Vietnam plans to formalise penalties for e-cigarette and heated tobacco use under a draft decree. Individual users could be fined VND 3–5 million (USD 114–190), while premises allowing use face fines up to VND 10 million (USD 380). Higher penalties apply to business violations.
Dec.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia’s Kuching court fines vape retailer USD 4921 over “BEST VALUE FOR MONEY” poster promotion
Malaysia’s Kuching court fines vape retailer USD 4921 over “BEST VALUE FOR MONEY” poster promotion
A vape retail company in Kuching, Malaysia, was fined RM20,000 (about USD 4,921.86) by the Magistrates’ Court on January 19, 2026, after pleading guilty to an offence under Section 9(1) of the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852). The case concerned a poster displayed at the company’s premises on October 6, 2025, carrying the slogan “BEST VALUE FOR MONEY.”
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
The Unified Patent Court’s Court of Appeal declined on Dec. 29 to revive a European patent held by VMR Products LLC, upholding a finding that the patent is not inventive over earlier devices. The decision said adding a window in the vape’s outer shell to reveal the internal cartridge holding vape liquid was an obvious, routine adaptation based on an earlier U.S. patent and general knowledge.
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai