MVIA Responds to 2Firsts:The e-liquid capacity for closed pod products will be reduced to 2ml two years from now

Sep.27.2024
MVIA Responds to 2Firsts:The e-liquid capacity for closed pod products will be reduced to 2ml two years from now
Malaysian Health Ministry to implement Tobacco Control Act on Oct 1, incl. e-cigarette restrictions. Industry expresses concerns.

Recently, the Ministry of Health in Malaysia announced that the "2024 Public Health Smoking Product Control Act" (Act 852) will officially be implemented on October 1. This act covers regulations regarding tobacco registration, sales, packaging, labeling, and smoking bans in public places, and also includes e-cigarettes under its regulatory scope. Many media outlets have reported that the new regulations will prohibit the display of e-cigarettes in stores and impose new capacity limits on e-cigarette liquids. The maximum capacity for disposable pods, replaceable e-liquid cartridges, and disposable products will be 3ml, while bottled e-liquid will have a maximum capacity of 15ml.

 

In response, 2Firsts contacted Rizani bin Zakaria, the Chairman of the Malaysian Vaping Industry Advocacy (MVIA), for more information.

 

In response to questions about 2Firsts, Razani stated that there will be more restrictions on e-liquid content in two years, with open pod systems, disposables, and closed pod systems decreasing from 3ml to 2ml. These clauses regarding e-cigarette e-liquid content restrictions currently do not have an official draft or document, and the Malaysian e-cigarette industry is currently awaiting the latest guidelines from the Ministry of Health.

 

The following is a conversation between 2Firsts and Rizani.

 

2Firsts:Could you outline the specific provisions of the new act (Act 852) regarding e-cigarette products? Does the act impose any restrictions on the capacity of e-cigarettes?

 

Rizani: Latest, Ministry Of Health announced the new act of 852 / new policy for vape & tobacco to start on 1st October. 

Here is a few draft by MOH (Ministry of Health) on vape.

  • Ejuice bottle limited to 15ml.
  • Open Pod Cartridge from 3ml to 2ml only after 2 years start from 1st Oct. 
  • Disposable/Closed Pod limited for 2ml after 2 years start from 1st Oct. 

Its also including to control by MOH, registatation of product, advertising, packaging, selling and buying, etc involved smoking of tobacco.

  • Restricted to sell online, open market, vending machine and all similiar style. 
  • Vape can only sell at specialized vape shop with terms and condition. 

Industry now waiting for proper draft and proper guideline from MOH yet still have many things to clear with the industry.

 

 

2Firsts:If the bill explicitly states restrictions on the capacity of pods and e-cigarette liquid, how will these restrictions be enforced? What specific impact will these new regulations have on the local e-cigarette industry?

 

Rizani: The most pressing issue for the e-cigarette industry in Malaysia is currently the need to address the ban on retail displays. The government should realize that this ban severely limits consumers' access to legitimate products and may push them towards illegal products.

 

 

2Firsts:The "banning the display of vape products at shop counters, reducing the maximum volume of vape liquids in disposable pods and cartridges to 3ml and to 15ml for bottles" circulating in the Malaysian market currently, we could not find relevant provisions in The Control Of Smoking Products For Public Health Act (Act 852) , Is there any other official document clarifying this point?

 

Rizani: The display ban poses the most immediate and significant threat to the survival of the vape ecosystem. For a niche product like vape, the ability to display and explain products is crucial.

 

Coupled with the low ML cap, which will force retailers to dispose of stock, the situation becomes even more dire. Many of these stores, especially smaller and independent operators, could be forced to close their doors permanently. Many retailers operate on thin margins, and the sudden need to dispose of unsellable stock, combined with new compliance costs, could push even more businesses to shutter. These closures would not only affect business owners but also lead to job losses and impact local economies.

 

 

2Firsts:If the act explicitly proposes restrictions on the capacity of pods and e-liquid, how will these restrictions be enforced?

 

Rizani: The most pressing need for the industry is to address the retail display ban. The government should recognise that this ban severely limits consumer access to regulated products, potentially driving them toward illegal products where unregulated and dangerous products are available. 

 

 

2Firsts:Could you provide the specific document or direct us to the relevant official website to obtain information?

 

Rizani: Tenporary, the industry also waiting for proper draft / document by MOH for vape regarding this new terms and conditions.

 

 

2Firsts:How do you think these new regulations will impact the development of the e-cigarette industry?

 

Rizani:  The government should consider postponing the enforcement of these new regulations and prioritise engaging with the vape industry to review and refine the proposed rules. A more collaborative approach would ensure that the regulations achieve public health goals while also safeguarding the livelihoods of the tens of thousands of Malaysians who depend on this industry.

 

The vape industry is not opposed to regulations. In fact, we welcome clear, sensible guidelines that ensure product safety and consumer protection. However, the current regulations may unintentionally stifle innovation and push responsible businesses out of the market, while doing little to control illegal products.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Special Report|Reynolds’ 337 Patent Case Ends, but a Harsher 337 Compliance Battle Now Targets the Entire Vape Supply Chain
Special Report|Reynolds’ 337 Patent Case Ends, but a Harsher 337 Compliance Battle Now Targets the Entire Vape Supply Chain
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has terminated Investigation 337-TA-1410 after invalidating key vape patent claims asserted by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, removing the immediate risk of import bans for dozens of companies. However, a new case—337-TA-1486—has already opened a more consequential legal front, shifting the focus from patent disputes to regulatory compliance across the vape supply chain, including PACT Act reporting, tax compliance, and FDA marketing authorization.
BAT
Mar.11
Kazakhstan: Over 131,000 vapes seized in Almaty and Pavlodar case; about $1.422 million cited
Kazakhstan: Over 131,000 vapes seized in Almaty and Pavlodar case; about $1.422 million cited
Kazakhstan’s financial monitoring authorities said a group is suspected of illicitly distributing vaping devices in Almaty and Pavlodar Region, using Telegram as a sales channel with courier delivery. During searches, investigators seized more than 131,000 vapes valued at 711 million tenge (about $1.422 million, using 1 tenge = $0.0020).
Mar.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK vape firm Plxsur sold for £76,500 after touting $1 billion revenue target
UK vape firm Plxsur sold for £76,500 after touting $1 billion revenue target
London-based vaping company Plxsur, which had claimed in fundraising materials it could reach $1 billion in annual revenue and capture about 10% of the global vaping market, has been sold out of administration for £76,500. Administrators said the figures were aspirational and depended on acquisitions that were never completed, as the company later ran out of cash and entered insolvency, with a shareholder ultimately buying the business.
Jan.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Singapore man, 21, assisting investigations after video allegedly shows him vaping on a bus
Singapore man, 21, assisting investigations after video allegedly shows him vaping on a bus
A 21-year-old man in Singapore is assisting with investigations after a video allegedly showing him vaping inside a bus went viral on social media. The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) said via its Instagram Stories that it had identified the man and seized e-vaporisers and 12 pods from his home on Feb 3. Vape-related penalties were strengthened from Sept 1, with first-time adult users liable to a $700 fine, and third-time offenders prosecuted and fined up to $2,000.
Feb.06
Philippines DOH reiterates: vaping is not safer than smoking, citing irreversible health risks
Philippines DOH reiterates: vaping is not safer than smoking, citing irreversible health risks
The Philippine Department of Health reiterated Saturday that vaping should not be promoted as an alternative to cigarette smoking, Health Secretary Teodoro “Ted” Herbosa said in a radio interview, according to the Tribune. Herbosa said both vaping and smoking pose irreversible health risks and cited E-cigarette or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI), claiming it led to the death of a 22-year-old male with no smoking history in 2025.
Feb.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Authorizes Glas Vape but Flavor Hopes Fall Short
FDA Authorizes Glas Vape but Flavor Hopes Fall Short
The FDA has added Glas products to its authorized electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) list, granting Marketing Granted Orders (MGOs) to the Glas G DEVICE and a BLONDE TOBACCO pod. The decision expands the number of FDA-authorized ENDS products to 41, marking the first new authorization since Juul’s approvals in July 2025. However, widely anticipated non-tobacco flavored products were not approved.
Mar.13