Key Takeaways
• Iowa’s 2024 law penalizes sales of e-cigarette products not listed on a state directory
• Listing is tied to FDCA premarket requirements for the product
• Chief U.S. District Judge Stephanie Rose preliminarily blocked enforcement based on FDCA exclusive enforcement language
• Iowa Deputy Solicitor General Patrick Valencia argued the law includes independent state-law requirements
• Attorney James Fraser argued the statute effectively enforces the FDCA and would not “make any sense” without it
• Case: Iowans for Alternatives v. Mary Mosiman, No. 25-2087
2Firsts, January 19, 2025 – According to LAW, an attorney for Iowa urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of a challenged state law restricting the sale of e-cigarette products, arguing that federal law does not override the state regulations.
At issue is a 2024 Iowa law that penalizes manufacturers that sell e-cigarette products not listed on a state-run directory. The report says products are included on the list only when the manufacturer or retailer follows certain premarket requirements for the product established under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
Chief U.S. District Judge Stephanie Rose of the Southern District of Iowa preliminarily blocked the law, saying it conflicts with an FDCA provision stating that “all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this [Act] shall be by and in the name of the United States,” which the court read as granting the federal government exclusive enforcement authority.
Iowa Deputy Solicitor General Patrick Valencia argued that state laws incorporating federal standards — but not relying solely on them — do not create an obstacle to federal enforcement. He said Iowa’s statute contains independent state-law requirements separate from any reliance on the FDCA or the Tobacco Control Act (TCA).
The panel, consisting of Judges James Loken, Raymond Gruender and L. Steven Grasz, pressed Valencia on whether the Eighth Circuit’s 2023 decision in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco v. City of Edina, Minnesota governs the dispute. Valencia argued Edina recognized that the TCA includes a “savings clause” preserving state regulation of tobacco product sales, and said the court should apply that clause to uphold Iowa’s law.
James Fraser, representing an Iowa trade association of e-cigarette sellers, argued the district court correctly held the Iowa law is likely preempted by Section 337 of the FDCA. He said the statute would not “make any sense” without the FDCA and amounts to the state trying to enforce the FDCA, which only the federal government may do. Fraser also argued Edina addressed the TCA savings clause rather than the FDCA’s Section 337 preemption language.
Image source: LAW
We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.
Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn
Notice
1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.
2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.
4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.
Copyright
This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.
For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.
We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com
