Malaysia's Proposed Ban on E-cigarettes Criticized by Doctor Association

Aug.01.2022
Malaysia's Proposed Ban on E-cigarettes Criticized by Doctor Association
Malaysia doctors criticize government proposal to ban e-cigarettes as a harm reduction tool for smokers.

KUALA LUMPUR, AUGUST 1 - A medical association has criticized the government's proposal to ban the promotion of e-cigarettes as a tobacco harm reduction alternative.


The Federation of Private Medical Practitioners' Association Malaysia (FPMPAM) has highlighted New Zealand and Australia's Tobacco Harm Reduction (THR) plans. New Zealand's plan includes a generational tobacco ban for those born after 2009, but it exempts electronic cigarettes as they are promoted as a tool to help smokers quit. However, Malaysia's "Generational Endgame for Tobacco Products and Smoking" (GEG) proposed in the 2022 tobacco products and smoking bill prohibits the sale, possession, and consumption of tobacco products to anyone born after 2007 and also bans electronic cigarettes, regardless of whether the e-liquid contains nicotine or not.


Dr. Steven Chow, the President of FPMPAM, stated today in a release, "The bill appears to completely disregard the overwhelming scientific data that shows THR can work within an appropriate regulatory framework.


Dr. Steven Chow, Chairman of the Federation of Private Medical Practitioners' Associations Malaysia (FPMPAM)


This was extensively documented in the Royal College of Physicians' 2016 report titled "Nicotine Without Smoke: Reducing the Harm of Tobacco".


According to a report released by the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) in the UK, electronic cigarettes seem to be effective as a smoking cessation aid when used by smokers. The report suggests that the long-term health risks associated with inhaling e-cigarette vapour are unlikely to exceed 5% of the risks associated with smoking.


The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) has stated that it is necessary to regulate the use of electronic cigarettes in order to reduce their direct and indirect harmful effects. However, the RCP warns against significantly restricting the use of harm-reducing products by smokers through such regulations.


However, for public health, it is important to promote as widely as possible the use of electronic cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and other non-tobacco nicotine products as substitutes for smoking.


Dr. Zhou pointed out that section 9(1) of the 2022 Tobacco Products and Smoking Control Bill will prohibit the promotion or sponsorship of electronic cigarette products as smoking cessation aids. This will effectively prevent the dissemination of information regarding tobacco harm reduction, such as discussions on the UK's RCP report.


Individuals who fail to comply with Section 9(1) may face a fine of up to RM20,000, a maximum sentence of one year imprisonment, or both, upon first conviction. Corporate entities may be fined between RM20,000 to RM100,000, face imprisonment for a maximum of two years, or face a fine upon the first offence after conviction.


Dr. Zhou stated, "The legislators from both sides of the House should carefully review this authoritative document and consider implementing policies that have already proven effective before starting to enforce GEG.


Pushing GEG without this preparation work would be a risky social experiment.


The Malaysian Medical Association (FPMPAM) has criticized the proposal to criminalize the possession and consumption of cigarettes, tobacco or electronic cigarettes by individuals born after January 1, 2007. FPMPAM describes this as a key provision in the Tobacco Control Bill.


Once convicted, these crimes may result in fines of up to RM 5000. If the Global E-cigarette and Tobacco Law is enforced starting from 2025, this means that adolescents and children aged 18 and below who are caught smoking, using e-cigarettes, or possessing tobacco or e-cigarette devices will face enforcement and prosecution.


Smoking, vaping, and using tobacco products have significant health consequences and are addictive diseases. Like all addicts, they require appropriate medical intervention and treatment from specially trained professionals, rather than being convicted as criminals, said FPMPAM.


The medical association has pointed out that their experience in community-based treatment for opioid addiction shows that a network of specially trained national general practitioners (GPs) and family doctors is best suited to manage this issue.


For children caught attempting to smoke or use e-cigarettes, they are also the best care points. However, the bill lacks provisions to promote and authorize healthcare professionals to complete this task.


I'm sorry, but without context or a specific text to refer to, I cannot provide a translation. Please provide more information or the original text.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
A Scottish government impact assessment estimates that proposed vape display and packaging rules could create up to £61 million ($82 million) in compliance costs for businesses, affecting more than 11,000 retail outlets. The estimated costs are mainly linked to inventory adjustments, retail storage changes and the resources required for businesses to understand and implement the new requirements. The measures form part of the UK’s broader efforts to tighten vape regulation, particularly around product displays, packaging and sales practices.
Aug.10
From Nicotine Salts to Cocrystals: China’s Shenzhen Huabao institute explores a more stable form for sustained nicotine release
From Nicotine Salts to Cocrystals: China’s Shenzhen Huabao institute explores a more stable form for sustained nicotine release
China-based Shenzhen Huabao Collaborative Innovation Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for a nicotine-ascorbic acid cocrystal, exploring a new solid-state form of nicotine. The patent proposes applications across e-liquids, heated tobacco sticks, oral tobacco, chewing tobacco and snuff. In nicotine pouch tests disclosed in the filing, cocrystal formulations showed less than a 6% decline in nicotine content after three months of accelerated storage and a release profile combining early-stage release with sustained delivery over 60 minutes. The filing reflects exploration of nicotine forms beyond conventional nicotine base and nicotine salts.
Aug.13
EU ‘TPD3’ Enters Next Phase on Aug. 14 as Fragmented Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules Push the Single Market Toward Regulatory Overhaul
EU ‘TPD3’ Enters Next Phase on Aug. 14 as Fragmented Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules Push the Single Market Toward Regulatory Overhaul
A 12-week European Commission consultation on revising the Tobacco Products Directive and Tobacco Advertising Directive is due to close on Aug. 14, 2026. The Commission has identified e-cigarette flavours, disposable vapes, tobacco heating devices, nicotine pouches, nicotine-free e-cigarettes, packaging and digital marketing among areas for possible new EU rules. National regulations already vary significantly across the bloc, a fragmentation the Commission says creates internal-market barriers and distorts competition. No formal revised TPD/TAD legislative text has yet been published, with the Commission currently indicating December 2026 for the legislative initiative.
Aug.14
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme will take effect on October 1, 2026. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK will face a flat excise duty of £2.20 per 10ml, whether or not they contain nicotine. Newly manufactured or imported products released onto the UK market from October 1 will require a valid duty stamp, while eligible existing unstamped inventory can continue to be sold through March 31, 2027. From April 1, 2027, all vaping products outside duty suspension must carry a valid stamp.
Sep.03
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28
FDA Unifies Tobacco Registration and Product Listing Form Across Product Categories
FDA Unifies Tobacco Registration and Product Listing Form Across Product Categories
The U.S. FDA has consolidated two tobacco establishment registration and product listing forms into a redesigned Form FDA 3741 covering all regulated product categories, including e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products and nicotine pouches. The current requirements remain limited to domestic establishments. Separately, the FDA has proposed extending registration and product listing requirements to foreign manufacturers, signaling greater regulatory attention to manufacturing entities and product-level information across the tobacco and nicotine supply chain.
FDA
Sep.30