Philippine Smoke-Free Movement Calls for E-Cigarette Regulation Review

Aug.13.2024
Philippine Smoke-Free Movement Calls for E-Cigarette Regulation Review
Philippine Smoke-Free Movement urges lawmakers to review e-cigarette regulations following first related death case, reports Manila Times.

According to a report by the Manila Times on August 13, the Philippine Smoke-Free Movement (PSFM) is calling on lawmakers to review the e-cigarette regulation law following the first reported death related to e-cigarettes.


Rizal Duro, the national coordinator for PSFM, mentioned during a forum on Monday (12th) a recent report from the Ministry of Health. The report stated that a 22-year-old athlete died from lung damage associated with e-cigarette use (Evali).


Du Luo pointed out that the athlete is in good physical health, with no underlying medical conditions, but has been using e-cigarettes daily for the past two years.


The coordinator cited government data and expressed regret over the sharp increase in the number of teenagers addicted to e-cigarettes.


A recent global survey on tobacco use among teenagers revealed that one in eight children aged 13 to 15 are already smoking, with one in seven preferring e-cigarettes.


Ma. Aurora Quilala, Deputy Executive Director of the Philippine Legislators' Committee on Population and Development (PLCPD), stated that the same data also indicates a failure in "our society and the entire country" in fully protecting the rights and well-being of young people, especially in terms of their health.


Quilala and Duro are both calling for an immediate review of Republic Act 11900 and are requesting that the age limit for the sale and use of e-cigarettes be restored to 21 years old.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Product | Compatible with Terea Sticks and Supporting Dual Heating: HiTaste Unveils New Heated Tobacco Device
Product | Compatible with Terea Sticks and Supporting Dual Heating: HiTaste Unveils New Heated Tobacco Device
HiTaste has introduced its new HNB device, the F10, on social media, highlighting its wrap-around heating and dual-heating features. Similar “dual-heating” and “one-stick-two-sessions” designs were widely showcased at InterTabac 2025, signaling that this technical direction is emerging as a new competitive focus among HNB brands.
Nov.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK to Implement e-cigarette Product Tax and Stamp Plan from October 1, 2026
UK to Implement e-cigarette Product Tax and Stamp Plan from October 1, 2026
HMRC announces e-cigarette tax stamp plan to combat illicit trade starting October 1, 2026 alongside VPD policy enforcement.
Nov.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Coral Springs, Florida Moves to Extend Ban on New Vape Shops as Number of Existing Stores Reaches 23
Coral Springs, Florida Moves to Extend Ban on New Vape Shops as Number of Existing Stores Reaches 23
Coral Springs, Florida is considering extending its six-month moratorium on new smoke and vape shops as it works to finalize zoning rules and regulatory measures in response to a rapid increase in such retailers in recent years. The city is already home to 23 smoke and vape shops.
Dec.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
CNIPA Targets E-Cigarettes as Key Focus in Crackdown on Trademark Violations
CNIPA Targets E-Cigarettes as Key Focus in Crackdown on Trademark Violations
National Intellectual Property Office issued a notice to strengthen management of illegal use of trademarks, promoting fair competition.
Nov.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kentucky lawmaker proposes directing Juul settlement funds to youth vaping prevention
Kentucky lawmaker proposes directing Juul settlement funds to youth vaping prevention
A Kentucky state senator has filed Senate Bill 74 to steer settlement money the Commonwealth received from vaping manufacturer Juul Labs into youth vaping prevention and cessation efforts.
Jan.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai