Potential Risks of Long-Term E-Cigarette Use

Dec.06.2022

Studies on the potential dangers of long-term e-cigarette use vary, with some suggesting a 5% risk of potential harm.

Some studies have not quantified the potential risks of long-term use of electronic cigarettes. Others believe that while the dangers of e-cigarettes are 95% lower than traditional cigarettes, the remaining 5% represents a conservative estimate of potential risks from flavorings and ingredients over the long term. Some still insist that it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions today. According to one study, most tested models showed low levels of toxicity, and therefore do not pose a danger to users.

However, the author explains that this is not a reliable measure as the number of models and amounts of e-liquid in the market continue to increase without testing [4]. Ultimately, for the World Health Organization, the toxicity of e-cigarettes may be lower than tobacco, but according to them, there is no evidence to suggest the effectiveness of e-cigarettes in quitting smoking [5]. The view that conflicts with the Cochrane organization's point of view is that e-cigarettes are almost twice as effective as other nicotine replacement products (patches, gum, etc.) in quitting smoking.

In the end, the results from these different studies may vary and have different interpretations, but almost all the research agrees on one point: the current results are encouraging.

2FIRSTS will continue to report on this topic, with further updates available on the "2FIRSTS APP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.

#Europe #Legislation #France #E-cigarette #E-cigarettes and Tobacco

This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Opinion | Samrat Chowdhery: Tobacco Price Elasticity—A Convenient Myth?

This opinion piece, submitted by Samrat Chowdhery to 2Firsts, challenges the logic of tobacco price elasticity. It argues that high taxes often harm vulnerable populations and fuel illicit markets rather than reducing smoking.

Oct.21

2FIRSTS Data Insight｜China’s Vape Exports to the U.S. Hit a Record $590 Million: A Peak Driven by Enforcement Cycles, Not Real Demand

China’s vape exports to the U.S. surged to a record $590 million in October 2025—nearly double the usual monthly level and pushing the U.S. share above 50% of China’s global shipments.But the spike was not driven by demand. Instead, it reflected a temporary release created by tightened U.S. enforcement, a collapsed logistics pathway, and a bullwhip-style surge in replenishment.The peak signals more volatility ahead, not recovery.

Special Report

Nov.24

Uruguay Weighs Ban on Nicotine Pouches as Health Ministry Warns of Growing Use

Nicotine pouches, promoted as flavored, smoke-free alternatives, are spreading in Uruguay despite the absence of a formal market. The Ministry of Public Health is considering banning them by decree and has raised the issue within Mercosur and at COP11. Health Minister Cristina Lustemberg warns that the industry is pushing new nicotine products to normalize consumption among youth.

Nov.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai

EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia

The EUIPO has ruled that Imiracle failed to demonstrate actual commercial use of its “Elfbar Crystal” brand in Slovakia, and therefore rejected in full the company’s opposition to Shenzhen SKE Technology’s application to register the “Crystal” trademark. The EUIPO noted that the sales records submitted by Imiracle were limited in scope and that the product packaging was in Ukrainian, which it found insufficient to prove that the products had been placed on the Slovak market.