Pressure Mounts on BAT to Move Primary Listing to US

Mar.22.2023
Pressure Mounts on BAT to Move Primary Listing to US
British American Tobacco may quit London stock market for US due to growing US focus.

According to reports, British American Tobacco (BAT) is facing pressure from at least one major shareholder to abandon its listing on the UK stock exchange and make the US its primary listing location. Losing BAT would be a significant blow to the capital markets, causing the FTSE 100 Index to lose a key player worth $80 billion.


The reasons for agreeing are simple. London-based British American Tobacco is increasingly centering itself around the United States. From 2017 to present, revenue from its largest single market has risen from 21.3% to 45.7%. The company's European and North African markets, including the UK, make up 22.9%, down from 31.2% five years ago. At this stage, a more appropriate name might be American British Tobacco. Due to being overlooked by domestic investors, British American Tobacco's trading volume has declined, creating a discrepancy in valuation compared to PMI, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.


Last year, British American Tobacco (BAT), the company behind the Pall Mall and Lucky Strike brands, generated higher revenue and operating profits than Philip Morris International (PMI), but its stock value lags far behind PMI. As of last Friday's close, PMI had a market capitalization of $149 billion, up over 80% from the previous year. Moving its main listing to New York will bring BAT closer to its largest shareholder, make it easier to access larger liquidity pools, and potentially help narrow the valuation gap. According to Rajiv Jain, the Chairman of BAT shareholder GQG, staying on the UK stock market no longer makes sense for tobacco manufacturers.


It is worth doubting whether the valuation gap is truly related to the listing location of BAT. PMI is listed in the United States, but its operations are overseas. The company was separated from its former parent company Altria Group Inc. in 2008, with Altria retaining its US operations. BAT's price-to-earnings ratio remains consistent with that of Altria. This makes sense because both companies are US-based enterprises.


In fact, the relationship between fundamental factors of a business and valuation differences may be more significant than geographical location. Altria suffered losses due to its $12.8 billion investment in Juul, an e-cigarette manufacturer accused of targeting underage users, five years ago. This year, Altria divested its stake in Juul and obtained Juul's heated non-burning patent technology in return.


Meanwhile, Philip Morris International (PMI) has been developing reduced-harm alternatives to traditional cigarettes at a faster pace, which is what large tobacco companies are relying on for their future success. The company is a leader in the tobacco industry and has achieved significant success in Japan through its IQOS heat-not-burn product. Last year, PMI acquired Swedish Match, a manufacturer of nicotine pouches, for approximately $16 billion, adding another non-combustible tobacco business to its portfolio. Furthermore, through distribution in the US, PMI has been able to re-establish itself in the largest tobacco alternatives market, 14 years after it was split from Altria. It also reached an agreement with Altria Group to sell IQOS in the US last year.


Last year, smoke-free revenue accounted for one-third of PMI's total revenue, with the company aiming to increase this to over 50% by 2025. Meanwhile, BAT's smoke-free revenue proportion for 2022 is just 15%, although the company has been catching up by launching products such as Vuse e-cigarettes, glo "heat-not-burn" products, and Velo nicotine pouches. However, BAT also faces other challenges, such as the proposed ban on menthol cigarettes by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Bloomberg analyst Duncan Fox estimates that these products account for about 35% of BAT's revenue in the US and 16%-17% of total sales. As PMI does not sell cigarettes in the US, it is not at risk from this potential regulation, but it is putting pressure on BAT's stock price.


Delaying the initial public offering (IPO) of BAT comes with costs and risks. It would mean that BAT would lose its position as a constituent of the FTSE 100 index, and there is no guarantee that it will be included in equivalent benchmark indices in the US. If BAT withdraws from London, some UK funds that hold domestic business authorizations may have to divest. The impact on relative investment flows and tax treatment must be considered. Listing in the US requires the approval of 75% of BAT shareholders, making it unlikely without strong support from GQG. American investors can already purchase BAT shares through American depositary receipts (the company is also undergoing a secondary listing in Johannesburg).


Preparing for a world without smoking takes time and investment, and regulatory challenges are never far away. For investors, seeking a quick fix to boost BAT stocks may be tempting, and New York may not provide it.


Reference:


Leaving London may not significantly improve the financial performance of BAT's stock.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

DOJ Trade Fraud Task Force Tops $1 Billion in Cases, Putting Vape Supply Chains at Risk of Fraud Enforcement
DOJ Trade Fraud Task Force Tops $1 Billion in Cases, Putting Vape Supply Chains at Risk of Fraud Enforcement
According to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Fox News and other reports, the DOJ’s Trade Fraud Task Force (TFTF) has been linked to more than $1 billion in recoveries, penalties, forfeitures and publicly charged losses in less than one year. The task force focuses on trade fraud issues including country-of-origin fraud, illegal transshipment, false declarations and tariff evasion. While vape products are not the main source of the $1 billion figure, the industry’s reliance on global manufacturing and cross-border supply chains places it within broader U.S. trade enforcement scrutiny. The development suggests that U.S. oversight of cross-border vape products may increasingly extend beyond product authorization into import compliance, supply-chain transparency and corporate accountability.
Jul.23
Nicotine Pouches Gain Ground in U.S. Convenience Stores as Vape Unit Sales Fall 14%
Nicotine Pouches Gain Ground in U.S. Convenience Stores as Vape Unit Sales Fall 14%
According to convenience retail publication CStore Decisions, U.S. convenience store tobacco categories are undergoing a structural shift. Based on Circana OmniMarket Total U.S. Convenience data for the 52 weeks ending June 14, 2026, cigarettes remained the largest category with $50.8 billion in sales, but unit sales declined 5.3%. Electronic smoking devices and vaping products also declined, while modern oral nicotine products continued to grow, with nicotine pouch sales rising 29% in dollars and 17% in units. Retailers said changing consumer preferences are reshaping tobacco product assortments at convenience stores.
Regulations
Aug.07
Senate Democrat Wyden Probes Trump Administration Vape Policy Shift, Seeks Records From HHS and Reynolds American
Senate Democrat Wyden Probes Trump Administration Vape Policy Shift, Seeks Records From HHS and Reynolds American
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, the Democratic ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, has launched an investigation into flavored vape policy changes and requested records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Reynolds American and Botanic Tonics. The investigation focuses on a timeline involving Reynolds American’s $5 million donation to MAGA Inc. in April 2026 and subsequent vape policy developments. Wyden said the review aims to examine potential links between political donations, corporate communications and government decisions. The investigation does not represent a finding of wrongdoing.
Innovation
Aug.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Adani’s Mumbai Airport Duty-Free Shops Face Scrutiny Over Nicotine Pouch Sales in India
Adani’s Mumbai Airport Duty-Free Shops Face Scrutiny Over Nicotine Pouch Sales in India
An Indian investigation found that duty-free shops at Mumbai international airport operated by billionaire Gautam Adani’s business group sold nicotine pouches in breach of the law, Reuters reported, in a case that could shape how India regulates sales of new nicotine products at airport retail outlets.
Jul.08
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
A consumer survey by Japanese heated tobacco information platform RELAZO found that rising tobacco prices and planned heated tobacco tax changes may influence smoking decisions among Japanese consumers. The survey covered 49,879 men and women aged 20 to 69 nationwide. It found that around 40% of respondents cumulatively indicated they may consider quitting when a pack reaches ¥600 (approximately US$4.1), while nearly 90% expressed potential quitting intentions at a ¥1,000 (approximately US$6.8) price level. The survey also found significant differences by income level, with lower-income respondents showing greater sensitivity to price increases.
Jul.24
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
A Quebec Superior Court has allowed a class action lawsuit against Juul Labs and Altria Group related to vaping products to proceed, involving allegations concerning marketing practices, youth exposure and corporate responsibility. The ruling only allows the case to move forward and does not represent a finding that Juul or Altria are legally liable. The case highlights continued legal risks facing vape companies regarding product marketing, youth protection and corporate accountability.
Jul.28