Russia's Proposed E-Cigarette Flavor Ban Passes in Parliament

Apr.12.2023
Russia's Proposed E-Cigarette Flavor Ban Passes in Parliament
Russian State Duma passes proposal to tighten e-cigarette regulations, banning flavor additives and underage usage.

On April 11th at 14:47 Moscow time, the Russian State Duma passed a proposal modifying certain legislative regulations with over 90% of the vote. The proposal aims to tighten regulations on e-cigarettes in Russia, including a ban on adding flavorings to e-cigarettes and addressing the issue of underage use.


After the proposal is passed, what are the following steps needed for the flavor ban to take effect? What is the next procedure? When does the flavor ban transition period end? In response to these questions, Liang Jiasen, a market researcher at 2FIRSTS focused on the Russian market, has reviewed and interpreted the proposal.


An Analysis of the Legislative Process in Russia:


According to Russian law, the Federal Assembly is the representative and legislative body of the Russian Federation. The Federal Assembly is composed of two chambers: the Federal Council (upper house) and the State Duma (lower house).


In the Russian legislative process, draft laws are submitted to the State Duma. Federal laws undergo a three-reading procedure in the State Duma, where a majority of votes from members is required for passage. After passage, the State Duma delivers the law to the Federation Council for review, which will approve the law if more than half of its members vote in favor or if the council fails to review it within 14 days.


In the event that the federal commission rejects a federal law, both houses can form a conciliation committee to resolve any differences that have arisen. Subsequently, the federal law should be re-evaluated by the State Duma. If the State Duma does not agree with the decision of the federal commission, and if at least two-thirds of the total number of State Duma members vote in favor during the review, the federal law will be passed.


Finally, the law that was approved by the State Duma and the Federal Assembly must be sent to the President for signing and enactment within five days. If the President rejects the law within 14 days of receiving it, the State Duma and the Federal Assembly may reconsider the law according to the prescribed procedure. If, upon reconsideration, the federal law is not amended and receives the support of no less than a two-thirds majority of both houses of representatives, the President must sign and enact the law within seven days. The diagram of the Russian legislative process is sourced from Perspective Russia.


What is the current progress of the ban on e-cigarette flavors and what are the necessary steps for it to become effective?


On April 11th, the bill regarding the regulation of electronic cigarettes was outlined. It includes provisions to ban the addition of flavorings and address the issue of preventing minors from using e-cigarettes.


According to the legislative process in Russia, the ban on this flavor has passed through three readings in the State Duma with a majority of over 90% of the votes. It will now be sent to the Federal Council (Upper House) for review within the next 5 days. If it passes the review, it will be submitted to the Presidential Administration for the signature of the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin. Once signed, the bill will be returned to the State Duma for public notice and will officially become national law.


It is known that in the legislative history of the Russian Federation, it is extremely rare for a legislative proposal to go through all three readings in the State Duma in one day. Additionally, there is no precedent where a law was approved by over 90% of the votes in the State Duma and subsequently rejected by the Federal Council.


The current proposal in legislation states that the ban on flavor additives will take effect on September 1st, with only a six-month transition period.


Topic: Updates on the Russian Ban on Electronic Cigarette Flavors and Expert Opinions (Click on the picture below to be redirected)


Further reading:


Timeline and Background of Russian Flavor Ban Bill, Passed in Three Readings within One Day


Article 2: Ban on flavored additives for e-cigarettes in Russia will take effect on September 1st; full details of the proposal attached. Article 3: Proposal in Russia to ban flavored e-cigarettes will be discussed for the first time on April 11th.


Russia has proposed a fine of up to 500,000 rubles for those selling e-cigarettes to minors.


Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin is considering a ban on electronic cigarettes.


In One Day, Three-Reading Passed Bill: A Timeline and Background of the Russian Taste Ban.


Expert Analysis Series:


Expert interpretation 1: The Russian flavor ban applies to all e-cigarette products, and specific additive standards have yet to be disclosed.


Expert Analysis 2: Russia Sets Minimum Retail Price for E-Cigarette Products to Reduce Demand for Nicotine-Based Products.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
Product | BAT Launches VELO WRKS Nicotine Pouches in Sweden, Introducing Dual-Compartment Cans With Two Flavours
Product | BAT Launches VELO WRKS Nicotine Pouches in Sweden, Introducing Dual-Compartment Cans With Two Flavours
British American Tobacco (BAT)'s VELO brand launched the VELO WRKS nicotine pouch range in Sweden on November 2, 2026. The initial release features three Dual Can variants, each containing two separate flavours in a dual-compartment container. Each can holds 20 slim pouches with 8mg of nicotine per pouch and retails for SEK 52.99. According to VELO, the first release, Drop 1, is limited to 75,000 cans and will remain available until February 2027 or while stocks last. VELO positions WRKS as a platform for testing new product concepts and has introduced an online consumer feedback survey. EU trademark records show BAT applied to register VELO WRKS in March 2026 under Class 34, covering nicotine pouches, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products and other tobacco-related goods.
product
Nov.03
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Three R.J. Reynolds companies are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY challenging the FDA's 2021 PMTA final rule. The companies dispute how the agency uses Acceptance and Filing reviews and completeness determinations to establish when the Tobacco Control Act's 180-day decision period begins. Reynolds has also linked prolonged PMTA reviews to competition from unauthorized vaping products. The FDA, meanwhile, has been accelerating reviews and reducing its backlog.
Sep.14
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
A federal judge in Texas on Oct. 8 granted a joint request by the FDA and plaintiffs including Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY to stay litigation challenging the agency's 2021 PMTA rule. The court cited FDA's anticipated rulemaking concerning the regulation at issue. FDA announced on Sept. 28 that it intends to reassess the PMTA framework and could initiate new rulemaking to replace it. The parties must file a joint status report within 45 days and every 45 days thereafter. A motion by three Reynolds American companies to intervene remains pending.
Regulations
Oct.10
South Korea Extends Vape Rules to Unmanned Stores After Bringing Synthetic Nicotine Under Tobacco Law
South Korea Extends Vape Rules to Unmanned Stores After Bringing Synthetic Nicotine Under Tobacco Law
South Korea's Ministry of Gender Equality and Family said on September 14 that it plans to designate unmanned e-cigarette stores as businesses where minors are prohibited from entering or working. Operators would be required to verify customers' ages and display notices restricting access by minors. The proposal is open for public comment through October 6. The move follows an April expansion of South Korea's statutory tobacco definition that brought products made with natural or synthetic nicotine under the Tobacco Business Act. Nicotine-free liquids and products using nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine, however, remain an emerging regulatory issue.
Sep.21
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
The UK Insolvency Service said YSK Enterprises imported large quantities of vapes from China in 2023, with a shipment addressed to the company declared as medical nebulizers before Border Force found 352,688 vaping products. HMRC calculated nearly £15 million ($20.3 million) in unpaid VAT and customs duty, alongside about £437,000 in corporation tax. Two directors were disqualified for nine years. The case predates the UK's Vaping Products Duty, which will introduce vape-specific excise and duty-stamp requirements from October 2026.
Regulations
Sep.11