Russia's Proposed E-Cigarette Flavor Ban Passes in Parliament

Apr.12.2023
Russia's Proposed E-Cigarette Flavor Ban Passes in Parliament
Russian State Duma passes proposal to tighten e-cigarette regulations, banning flavor additives and underage usage.

On April 11th at 14:47 Moscow time, the Russian State Duma passed a proposal modifying certain legislative regulations with over 90% of the vote. The proposal aims to tighten regulations on e-cigarettes in Russia, including a ban on adding flavorings to e-cigarettes and addressing the issue of underage use.


After the proposal is passed, what are the following steps needed for the flavor ban to take effect? What is the next procedure? When does the flavor ban transition period end? In response to these questions, Liang Jiasen, a market researcher at 2FIRSTS focused on the Russian market, has reviewed and interpreted the proposal.


An Analysis of the Legislative Process in Russia:


According to Russian law, the Federal Assembly is the representative and legislative body of the Russian Federation. The Federal Assembly is composed of two chambers: the Federal Council (upper house) and the State Duma (lower house).


In the Russian legislative process, draft laws are submitted to the State Duma. Federal laws undergo a three-reading procedure in the State Duma, where a majority of votes from members is required for passage. After passage, the State Duma delivers the law to the Federation Council for review, which will approve the law if more than half of its members vote in favor or if the council fails to review it within 14 days.


In the event that the federal commission rejects a federal law, both houses can form a conciliation committee to resolve any differences that have arisen. Subsequently, the federal law should be re-evaluated by the State Duma. If the State Duma does not agree with the decision of the federal commission, and if at least two-thirds of the total number of State Duma members vote in favor during the review, the federal law will be passed.


Finally, the law that was approved by the State Duma and the Federal Assembly must be sent to the President for signing and enactment within five days. If the President rejects the law within 14 days of receiving it, the State Duma and the Federal Assembly may reconsider the law according to the prescribed procedure. If, upon reconsideration, the federal law is not amended and receives the support of no less than a two-thirds majority of both houses of representatives, the President must sign and enact the law within seven days. The diagram of the Russian legislative process is sourced from Perspective Russia.


What is the current progress of the ban on e-cigarette flavors and what are the necessary steps for it to become effective?


On April 11th, the bill regarding the regulation of electronic cigarettes was outlined. It includes provisions to ban the addition of flavorings and address the issue of preventing minors from using e-cigarettes.


According to the legislative process in Russia, the ban on this flavor has passed through three readings in the State Duma with a majority of over 90% of the votes. It will now be sent to the Federal Council (Upper House) for review within the next 5 days. If it passes the review, it will be submitted to the Presidential Administration for the signature of the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin. Once signed, the bill will be returned to the State Duma for public notice and will officially become national law.


It is known that in the legislative history of the Russian Federation, it is extremely rare for a legislative proposal to go through all three readings in the State Duma in one day. Additionally, there is no precedent where a law was approved by over 90% of the votes in the State Duma and subsequently rejected by the Federal Council.


The current proposal in legislation states that the ban on flavor additives will take effect on September 1st, with only a six-month transition period.


Topic: Updates on the Russian Ban on Electronic Cigarette Flavors and Expert Opinions (Click on the picture below to be redirected)


Further reading:


Timeline and Background of Russian Flavor Ban Bill, Passed in Three Readings within One Day


Article 2: Ban on flavored additives for e-cigarettes in Russia will take effect on September 1st; full details of the proposal attached. Article 3: Proposal in Russia to ban flavored e-cigarettes will be discussed for the first time on April 11th.


Russia has proposed a fine of up to 500,000 rubles for those selling e-cigarettes to minors.


Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin is considering a ban on electronic cigarettes.


In One Day, Three-Reading Passed Bill: A Timeline and Background of the Russian Taste Ban.


Expert Analysis Series:


Expert interpretation 1: The Russian flavor ban applies to all e-cigarette products, and specific additive standards have yet to be disclosed.


Expert Analysis 2: Russia Sets Minimum Retail Price for E-Cigarette Products to Reduce Demand for Nicotine-Based Products.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Reynolds Puts Nearly 183,000 U.S. Contracted Outlets Under Age-Verification Rules, Covering 94% of Volume — Can It Shift an Unauthorized Vape Market?
Reynolds Puts Nearly 183,000 U.S. Contracted Outlets Under Age-Verification Rules, Covering 94% of Volume — Can It Shift an Unauthorized Vape Market?
Reynolds American says nearly 183,000 U.S. retail outlets are under contract, with its Retail Marketing Plan Contract covering about 94% of company volume and requiring point-of-sale age verification. The company combines those contracts with We Card, TruAge, NACS-linked infrastructure and POS integration, while enhanced Vuse Pro retail rules add ID scanning, purchase limits and stronger underage-sales accountability. The initial Vuse Pro rollout targets about 50,000 stores. The system is taking shape as unauthorized vapor products remain dominant in parts of the U.S. market: a 2026 study estimated they accounted for 69.4% of tracked brick-and-mortar e-cigarette dollar sales in December 2025.
Special Report
Oct.15
EU Tobacco Tax Reform Targets November Push as Sweden Holds Nicotine-Pouch Minimum at €20 per Kilogram
EU Tobacco Tax Reform Targets November Push as Sweden Holds Nicotine-Pouch Minimum at €20 per Kilogram
The Irish presidency of the Council of the European Union is using bilateral talks to push the bloc’s Tobacco Taxation Directive toward a political agreement in November. According to Law360, citing an EU official, Sweden is unwilling to accept a minimum excise threshold above €20 per kilogram for nicotine pouches. Council negotiations have already lowered the European Commission’s original proposal, but a May 2026 presidency compromise still set the minimum at 10% of the tax-inclusive retail price or €30 per kilogram in 2028-29, with higher levels later.
Market
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
According to Free Malaysia Today on August 26, 2026, Malaysia’s Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Health Ministry would explain the government’s decision to withdraw its appeal against a High Court ruling involving the exemption of liquid nicotine used in vape products from the Poisons List. The High Court previously ruled that the exemption decision was irrational. Dzulkefly said withdrawing the appeal did not mean the government would stop regulating vaping, and that future regulatory approaches would continue under existing legal frameworks.
Aug.28
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
China STMA Deputy Administrator Meets KT&G COO as Heated Cigarette Rules Advance
China STMA Deputy Administrator Meets KT&G COO as Heated Cigarette Rules Advance
Wang Gongcheng, deputy administrator of China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, met KT&G Chief Operating Officer Lee Sang-hak in Shanghai on September 1, according to Oriental Tobacco News. The meeting comes as China seeks public comment on a draft mandatory national standard for heated cigarettes. The report did not disclose the subjects discussed or indicate whether heated tobacco products or market access were addressed.
News
Sep.02