Santa Cruz County Bans Sale of Filtered Cigarettes in Unincorporated Areas

Oct.12.2024
Santa Cruz County Bans Sale of Filtered Cigarettes in Unincorporated Areas
Santa Cruz County Supervisors unanimously passed a bill banning the sale of filtered cigarettes in unincorporated areas to reduce pollution.

According to Ksbw recent report, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a bill on (8th) banning the sale of filtered cigarettes in unincorporated areas of the county. The measure aims to reduce pollution caused by cigarette butts and promote human health by restricting plastic use.


Chairman of the Supervisory Committee Justin Cummings stated,


This is a significant day, built upon the work of protecting our community and establishing Santa Cruz County as a leader in the global environmental movement. While we are the first county to take this step, we will not be the last. We look forward to collaborating with local cities and other jurisdictions to collectively protect our coastline, environment, and people.


In addition, the sale of unfiltered cigarettes, cigars, loose leaf tobacco, chewing tobacco, unflavored e-cigarettes, and other tobacco products will continue to be allowed. The new regulation will take effect on January 1, 2027.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Special Report|Russia scales back anti-vaping drive, limits ban to single-region trial
Special Report|Russia scales back anti-vaping drive, limits ban to single-region trial
After months of debate, Russian lawmakers have retreated from plans for a nationwide vaping ban, opting instead for a single-region pilot. The shift reflects pressure from business groups and fiscal authorities, amid warnings that sweeping prohibitions could fuel illegal trade while undermining efforts to regulate the market.
Jan.22
Russia’s Federation Council Approves Law Allowing Extrajudicial Blocking of Online Tobacco Sales
Russia’s Federation Council Approves Law Allowing Extrajudicial Blocking of Online Tobacco Sales
Russia’s Federation Council has approved legislation allowing authorities to block websites offering online sales of tobacco, nicotine-containing products, heated tobacco devices and hookahs without a court order.
Dec.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippine BIR Will Destroys Nearly 450,000 Illicit Vape Products Over Unpaid Taxes
Philippine BIR Will Destroys Nearly 450,000 Illicit Vape Products Over Unpaid Taxes
The Philippine Bureau of Internal Revenue has led a nationwide destruction of illicit vape products, citing unpaid excise taxes and penalties amounting to 1.34 billion pesos(approximately US$22 million). Nearly 450,000 units are scheduled for destruction over three days across multiple revenue regions. The seized products violated excise tax laws due to non-payment of taxes, lack of internal revenue stamps, and non-registration of vape brands.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Indiana SB 185 Advances: Foreign-Made Vapes Would Be Barred, With Focus on China
Indiana SB 185 Advances: Foreign-Made Vapes Would Be Barred, With Focus on China
Indiana State Sen. Ron Alting is backing Senate Bill 185, which would ban vape shops in Indiana from selling any foreign-made vaping products and restrict retail shelves to U.S.-made items. Alting has framed the proposal as a consumer-safety measure and has singled out China, citing industry reporting that China produces more than 90% of the world’s vape hardware.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Illegal Disposable Vapes Still Sold in Nottingham Six Months After UK Ban: LBC Investigation
Illegal Disposable Vapes Still Sold in Nottingham Six Months After UK Ban: LBC Investigation
According to LBC, a follow-up investigation in Nottingham found that four out of 14 shops visited still sold illegal disposable vapes, six months after the UK Government’s ban took effect. Although fewer retailers appeared to be offering banned products compared with an earlier visit, illegal vapes remain available despite ongoing enforcement efforts.
Dec.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
5th Circuit Reviews FDA’s Compliance on Small-Business Impact of Vape Rule
5th Circuit Reviews FDA’s Compliance on Small-Business Impact of Vape Rule
A Fifth Circuit panel expressed doubts about whether the U.S. Food and Drug Administration complied with the Regulatory Flexibility Act when issuing its 2021 final rule on premarket tobacco product applications. Vape companies argued the FDA relied on outdated and inaccurate economic data, while the government said the challenged requirements stem from the Tobacco Control Act.
Dec.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai