South African E-Cigarette Tax Proposal Sparks Controversy

Sep.21.2022
South African E-Cigarette Tax Proposal Sparks Controversy
Proposed equal tax on all e-cigarette products in South Africa to ensure fair competition, warns tobacco company. Prices will more than double otherwise.

British American Tobacco South Africa has stated that any proposed consumption tax on electronic cigarette products should be uniformly applied to all "participants" to ensure fair competition and an equal competitive environment for all participants. Otherwise, electronic cigarette prices could double or more.


Tobacco giants, represented by Dianne Moyses, stated at the Financial Standing Committee that according to their own data, e-cigarette products account for less than 0.5% of the nicotine products market in South Africa.


However, there are too many retailers creating their own e-cigarette liquids.


According to Mouyis, many individuals are "DIY-ing" imported liters of nicotine liquid just to turn it into more small pod bottles, a tax-free product.


The National Treasury department has proposed an average consumption tax of R2.91 per milliliter for electronic cigarettes, with a 70:30 ratio between nicotine and non-nicotine elements.


Representatives have stated that in order to ensure taxation from this transaction, they worked with the Oxford Economics Research Institute and found that a tax rate of R1.45/ml should be the absolute ceiling for tariffs.


The representative stated that, taking South Africa's capacity into consideration, a tariff of 70 cents would be more appropriate.


Representing manufacturers and retailers, the South African Vapour Product Association's Asanda Gcoyi has issued a warning that taxes will drive up prices, resulting in a potential average price increase of 138% for e-cigarette products and a 36% decrease in consumption of e-cigarette oil.


The British American Tobacco Company emphasizes that a radical increase in consumption taxes will push consumers towards a growing illegal market.


The tobacco company has proposed the following changes to the country's electronic cigarette products:


It is necessary to introduce a consumer tax registration system for manufacturers and retailers – opening up the market to the South African Revenue Service (SARS).


Manufacturers will be required to label their e-cigarette products with nicotine volume measurements on their packaging. Currently, e-cigarettes are measured by the number of puffs they provide, but tracking should be based on the volume of nicotine in milliliters.


Implement a tracking system with a unique identification code for every product from day one.


Gcoyi added that the proposed tax raises concerns as there are flaws in the underlying rationale.


She stated that the scientific basis for taxation is inaccurate because the national Ministry of Finance believes that the electronic cigarette industry is attempting to undermine global tobacco efforts, while many international studies have actually shown that e-cigarettes are a less harmful alternative to traditional smoking.


She added that the purpose of the consumption tax is still unclear, as the Ministry of Finance has provided very few details on how it will benefit public health, and there is also insufficient research on the effects it will have on youth consumption.


Gcoyi argues that imposing a consumption tax would have significant unexpected and irrational consequences. One such consequence is that the proposed tariffs would make electronic cigarettes more expensive than traditional cigarettes, leading to illegal trade and going against the principle of harm reduction.


Subsequently, the Steam Products Association has called on businesses to oppose the consumption tax and has urged the Ministry of Finance to conduct further market research on their proposal's impact.


Statement:


This article is a compilation of third-party information intended for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and we cannot confirm the accuracy or truthfulness of its content. The compilation of this article is solely intended for discussion and research within the industry.


Due to the limitations of the translation ability, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS aligns completely with the Chinese government's views and positions on any matters concerning domestic issues, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign affairs.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canadian Health Minister Marjorie Michel says she is not considering loosening retail restrictions on nicotine pouches. Canada regulates pouches containing 4 mg or less of nicotine per unit as non-prescription nicotine replacement therapy and requires newer NRT formats such as pouches to be sold from behind pharmacy counters. Meanwhile, Unsmoke Canada, linked to Philip Morris International's Canadian business, is pushing to allow pouches in convenience stores and other general retail outlets. Health Canada also acknowledges continued unauthorized sales, while recent research shows rising pouch use among Canadian youth aged 16 to 19.
Sep.24
Product | OXVA Introduces XLIM PRO 4 With Liquid-Level Anti-Burn Technology and Dedicated Pods
Product | OXVA Introduces XLIM PRO 4 With Liquid-Level Anti-Burn Technology and Dedicated Pods
Vaping brand OXVA introduced the XLIM PRO 4 refillable pod system in October 2026, featuring Anti-Burn Tech (ABT) based on smart e-liquid-level detection. The system can issue refill alerts and stop power output when e-liquid levels become too low. ABT requires the XLIM PRO 4 device and a dedicated XLIM ABT cartridge. Standard XLIM pods remain compatible but do not support ABT protection. OXVA previously introduced temperature-based anti-burn technology in the XLIM Pro 2 DNA, developed with Evolv. The new device features a 1,800mAh battery, 5–30W output and a 0.98-inch HD color screen. OXVA's official store lists the device at $37.90 and dedicated ABT replacement cartridges at $12.99. Independent testing confirmed the low-liquid protection response but recorded varying cartridge lifespans.
product
Oct.30
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona's First Things First is pushing for an excise tax equal to 50% of the retail price of vaping products, estimating that the measure could generate about $100 million annually. The agency says its tobacco-tax revenue has fallen 47% from 2008 levels. Arizona has attempted to broaden its nicotine tax base in each of the past two years: a 2025 bill proposed a 50% wholesale-price tax, while a 2026 measure shifted to a 50% retail-price tax covering alternative nicotine products and vapor products. Separately, the state enacted HB 4001 this year to establish a new licensing and sales framework for alternative nicotine products.
Sep.21
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
American Vapor Manufacturers (AVM) and Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY filed separate motions on October 7, 2026, seeking to intervene on the FDA's side in a lawsuit challenging its enforcement guidance for certain e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with pending premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). Seven public health and tobacco-control organizations, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, sued the agency in July to overturn the policy. AVM argues that vacating the guidance could disrupt orders, inventory, retail distribution and investments in regulatory submissions.
Regulations
Oct.09