South African E-Cigarette Tax Proposal Sparks Controversy

Sep.21.2022
South African E-Cigarette Tax Proposal Sparks Controversy
Proposed equal tax on all e-cigarette products in South Africa to ensure fair competition, warns tobacco company. Prices will more than double otherwise.

British American Tobacco South Africa has stated that any proposed consumption tax on electronic cigarette products should be uniformly applied to all "participants" to ensure fair competition and an equal competitive environment for all participants. Otherwise, electronic cigarette prices could double or more.


Tobacco giants, represented by Dianne Moyses, stated at the Financial Standing Committee that according to their own data, e-cigarette products account for less than 0.5% of the nicotine products market in South Africa.


However, there are too many retailers creating their own e-cigarette liquids.


According to Mouyis, many individuals are "DIY-ing" imported liters of nicotine liquid just to turn it into more small pod bottles, a tax-free product.


The National Treasury department has proposed an average consumption tax of R2.91 per milliliter for electronic cigarettes, with a 70:30 ratio between nicotine and non-nicotine elements.


Representatives have stated that in order to ensure taxation from this transaction, they worked with the Oxford Economics Research Institute and found that a tax rate of R1.45/ml should be the absolute ceiling for tariffs.


The representative stated that, taking South Africa's capacity into consideration, a tariff of 70 cents would be more appropriate.


Representing manufacturers and retailers, the South African Vapour Product Association's Asanda Gcoyi has issued a warning that taxes will drive up prices, resulting in a potential average price increase of 138% for e-cigarette products and a 36% decrease in consumption of e-cigarette oil.


The British American Tobacco Company emphasizes that a radical increase in consumption taxes will push consumers towards a growing illegal market.


The tobacco company has proposed the following changes to the country's electronic cigarette products:


It is necessary to introduce a consumer tax registration system for manufacturers and retailers – opening up the market to the South African Revenue Service (SARS).


Manufacturers will be required to label their e-cigarette products with nicotine volume measurements on their packaging. Currently, e-cigarettes are measured by the number of puffs they provide, but tracking should be based on the volume of nicotine in milliliters.


Implement a tracking system with a unique identification code for every product from day one.


Gcoyi added that the proposed tax raises concerns as there are flaws in the underlying rationale.


She stated that the scientific basis for taxation is inaccurate because the national Ministry of Finance believes that the electronic cigarette industry is attempting to undermine global tobacco efforts, while many international studies have actually shown that e-cigarettes are a less harmful alternative to traditional smoking.


She added that the purpose of the consumption tax is still unclear, as the Ministry of Finance has provided very few details on how it will benefit public health, and there is also insufficient research on the effects it will have on youth consumption.


Gcoyi argues that imposing a consumption tax would have significant unexpected and irrational consequences. One such consequence is that the proposed tariffs would make electronic cigarettes more expensive than traditional cigarettes, leading to illegal trade and going against the principle of harm reduction.


Subsequently, the Steam Products Association has called on businesses to oppose the consumption tax and has urged the Ministry of Finance to conduct further market research on their proposal's impact.


Statement:


This article is a compilation of third-party information intended for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and we cannot confirm the accuracy or truthfulness of its content. The compilation of this article is solely intended for discussion and research within the industry.


Due to the limitations of the translation ability, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS aligns completely with the Chinese government's views and positions on any matters concerning domestic issues, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign affairs.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Texas Extends Tobacco Tax Interpretation to a 6-Methylnicotine Product, Citing VELO Ruling
Texas Extends Tobacco Tax Interpretation to a 6-Methylnicotine Product, Citing VELO Ruling
The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts ruled in September 2026 that a combustible product made with non-tobacco plant material and 6-methylnicotine (6-MN), a synthetic nicotine analog, qualifies as a taxable tobacco product. The applicant said the product contained neither tobacco leaf nor measurable conventional nicotine. The determination applies reasoning from a May Texas Supreme Court decision involving VELO nicotine pouches, finding that the plant material and 6-MN together perform the functions of tobacco in a conventional smoking product. The ruling carries applicable tax, licensing and reporting obligations but is limited to the facts submitted by the taxpayer. It does not establish a blanket tax classification for all 6-MN products or extend the same conclusion to e-cigarettes.
Regulations
Nov.06
PMI Launches Fourth IQOS Convenience-Store Discount of 2026 for Black Friday in Japan, Cutting ILUMA i ONE to About $19 After Ploom AURA Fell to About $9
PMI Launches Fourth IQOS Convenience-Store Discount of 2026 for Black Friday in Japan, Cutting ILUMA i ONE to About $19 After Ploom AURA Fell to About $9
Philip Morris Japan launched its fourth confirmed nationwide convenience-store discount campaign for IQOS ILUMA i devices in 2026 on October 26, cutting three models by as much as ¥2,000, or about $12.70. The campaign began one day after JT ended a promotion that reduced Ploom AURA to ¥1,480, or about $9.40. JT says Ploom's share of Japan's heated-products category rose from 10.9% in January 2024 to 18.3% in June 2026, a gain of 7.4 percentage points, while PMI says IQOS still held about 68% category share in the third quarter. At the same time, Japan's two-stage heated-tobacco tax adjustment has pushed stick prices higher, leaving device discounts as an increasingly important tool for lowering the upfront cost of customer acquisition.
Market
Oct.28
Sweden Threatens EU Tobacco Tax Deal as Nicotine Pouch Duty Dispute Looms Over November 9 Meeting
Sweden Threatens EU Tobacco Tax Deal as Nicotine Pouch Duty Dispute Looms Over November 9 Meeting
Sweden is expected to oppose a European Union proposal to raise minimum tobacco excise duties, Law360 reported on October 26, 2026, citing an EU official. A provisional Council agenda dated October 23 confirms that the tobacco taxation package is scheduled for discussion at the November 9 finance ministers' meeting, where member states will seek a general approach. The proposed reforms would raise minimum taxes on conventional tobacco products and establish EU-wide excise rules for vaping liquids, heated tobacco and nicotine pouches. Sweden supports harmonising tobacco taxation rules but objects to requiring nicotine pouches to bear the same minimum tax burden as certain smoking tobacco products. As EU indirect tax legislation requires unanimous Council approval, Swedish opposition could block the proposal in its current form.
Regulations
Oct.29
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Philip Morris Malaysia Again Meets Religious Authority Over Cigarette Alternatives as Perlis Mufti Responds on Halal Criteria
Philip Morris Malaysia Again Meets Religious Authority Over Cigarette Alternatives as Perlis Mufti Responds on Halal Criteria
Philip Morris Malaysia Managing Director Naeem Shahab Khan met Perlis Mufti Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin on September 17 and presented the company's shift from conventional cigarettes toward alternative products. The mufti said a product could be considered halal if it is clean, its side effects are not harmful or can be controlled, and it does not involve excessive waste. His remarks did not mention IQOS or any other specific PMI product and did not amount to a new product-specific religious ruling. It was at least the second publicly reported engagement between Philip Morris Malaysia and a Malaysian religious institution over cigarette alternatives within six months.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
German prosecutors and customs authorities are conducting a criminal investigation into an alleged cross-border organised vape network. Authorities say that between January 2024 and March 2025, four employees of an unnamed Chinese e-cigarette manufacturer allegedly built a network of sales agents and wholesalers that brought more than 7.6 million nicotine disposable vapes into Germany, causing an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses. The manufacturer has not been named. Some products visible in enforcement images have packaging resembling products from FUMOT’s portfolio. European regulatory records from 2024, FUMOT’s public overseas-sales materials and records involving German vape importer and distribution company Zamu-Pro GmbH also show FUMOT/RandM products and German distribution activity during the period covered by the investigation.
Sep.21