South African E-Cigarette Tax Proposal Sparks Controversy

Sep.21.2022
South African E-Cigarette Tax Proposal Sparks Controversy
Proposed equal tax on all e-cigarette products in South Africa to ensure fair competition, warns tobacco company. Prices will more than double otherwise.

British American Tobacco South Africa has stated that any proposed consumption tax on electronic cigarette products should be uniformly applied to all "participants" to ensure fair competition and an equal competitive environment for all participants. Otherwise, electronic cigarette prices could double or more.


Tobacco giants, represented by Dianne Moyses, stated at the Financial Standing Committee that according to their own data, e-cigarette products account for less than 0.5% of the nicotine products market in South Africa.


However, there are too many retailers creating their own e-cigarette liquids.


According to Mouyis, many individuals are "DIY-ing" imported liters of nicotine liquid just to turn it into more small pod bottles, a tax-free product.


The National Treasury department has proposed an average consumption tax of R2.91 per milliliter for electronic cigarettes, with a 70:30 ratio between nicotine and non-nicotine elements.


Representatives have stated that in order to ensure taxation from this transaction, they worked with the Oxford Economics Research Institute and found that a tax rate of R1.45/ml should be the absolute ceiling for tariffs.


The representative stated that, taking South Africa's capacity into consideration, a tariff of 70 cents would be more appropriate.


Representing manufacturers and retailers, the South African Vapour Product Association's Asanda Gcoyi has issued a warning that taxes will drive up prices, resulting in a potential average price increase of 138% for e-cigarette products and a 36% decrease in consumption of e-cigarette oil.


The British American Tobacco Company emphasizes that a radical increase in consumption taxes will push consumers towards a growing illegal market.


The tobacco company has proposed the following changes to the country's electronic cigarette products:


It is necessary to introduce a consumer tax registration system for manufacturers and retailers – opening up the market to the South African Revenue Service (SARS).


Manufacturers will be required to label their e-cigarette products with nicotine volume measurements on their packaging. Currently, e-cigarettes are measured by the number of puffs they provide, but tracking should be based on the volume of nicotine in milliliters.


Implement a tracking system with a unique identification code for every product from day one.


Gcoyi added that the proposed tax raises concerns as there are flaws in the underlying rationale.


She stated that the scientific basis for taxation is inaccurate because the national Ministry of Finance believes that the electronic cigarette industry is attempting to undermine global tobacco efforts, while many international studies have actually shown that e-cigarettes are a less harmful alternative to traditional smoking.


She added that the purpose of the consumption tax is still unclear, as the Ministry of Finance has provided very few details on how it will benefit public health, and there is also insufficient research on the effects it will have on youth consumption.


Gcoyi argues that imposing a consumption tax would have significant unexpected and irrational consequences. One such consequence is that the proposed tariffs would make electronic cigarettes more expensive than traditional cigarettes, leading to illegal trade and going against the principle of harm reduction.


Subsequently, the Steam Products Association has called on businesses to oppose the consumption tax and has urged the Ministry of Finance to conduct further market research on their proposal's impact.


Statement:


This article is a compilation of third-party information intended for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and we cannot confirm the accuracy or truthfulness of its content. The compilation of this article is solely intended for discussion and research within the industry.


Due to the limitations of the translation ability, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS aligns completely with the Chinese government's views and positions on any matters concerning domestic issues, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign affairs.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company has begun selling four flavored Vuse Pro pods — Peach, Berry, Watermelon and Fresh Mint — in Ohio and selected other U.S. markets. According to the Vuse U.S. FAQ, Vuse Pro contains approximately 5.0% nicotine by weight, and Vuse Pro pre-filled pods are intended for use with Vuse Alto devices. Reynolds told 2Firsts that product labeling lists an e-liquid capacity of 2.0 mL per pod. The Vuse Alto Power Unit received FDA marketing authorization in 2024, while the new Vuse Pro pods themselves have not received marketing granted orders. The rollout follows the FDA’s May 2026 revision of enforcement priorities for certain unauthorized vaping products with qualifying pending applications.
BAT
Sep.10
On-Site Report | After FDA Announces Review of PMTA Framework, CTP Director Details Reform Priorities
On-Site Report | After FDA Announces Review of PMTA Framework, CTP Director Details Reform Priorities
FDA CTP Director Bret Koplow used his FDLI keynote in Washington to outline how the agency is rethinking the PMTA framework. He discussed category-specific review, nicotine pouch and sPMTA pilots, AI-assisted review, a 70% reduction in pending applications, and a major staffing constraint: CTP currently has only nine scientific review teams. He also reaffirmed tobacco harm reduction while stressing youth protection, flavored products, risk communication, and the challenge of unauthorized e-cigarettes.
Regulations
Oct.06
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Capital is reassessing the global tobacco and modern nicotine industry as heated tobacco, vaping and nicotine pouches reshape demand, profitability and regulation. At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, investors and analysts examined whether smoke-free growth can sustain earnings, how regulation shapes startup value, and whether shareholder engagement can be more effective than divestment. The debate points to a broader shift: tobacco transition is increasingly becoming a capital-allocation, governance and valuation question.
Capital Markets
Oct.05
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
HM Revenue & Customs put the UK's Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme into effect on October 1. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK are now subject to duty at £2.20 per 10ml, regardless of nicotine content. The stamp regime will introduce digital functionality designed to provide traceability throughout the supply chain, with approved manufacturers, importers and warehousekeepers required to report product movements and retailers and consumers eventually able to scan stamps to verify authenticity. China exported $177 million of vape-related products to the UK in August, up 51.4% year over year, increasing the significance of the new compliance regime for China's Shenzhen-centered vape supply chain.
Regulations
Oct.04
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products detailed new PMTA review data and process changes at the 2026 FDLI conference. Pending PMTAs fell from about 450,000 at the start of 2025 to 135,000 by September 2026. CTP also discussed its 180-day review goal, current sPMTA pilot, alternate-supplier planning, more than 50,300 pending SE reports, and lessons from the nicotine pouch pilot already being applied to ENDS review.
Regulations
Oct.07