South Korean E-cigarette Association sues government for economic damages.

Oct.17.2022
South Korean E-cigarette Association sues government for economic damages.
South Korea's electronic cigarette association has sued the government for causing economic losses to small e-cigarette businesses with incorrect information.

The Korean e-cigarette association has filed a lawsuit against the government, accusing it of causing economic losses to small business owners involved in the e-cigarette industry by providing incorrect information.


The Korea E-cigarette Association (KECA) has accused the government's health agency, the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW), of damaging the reputation of small e-cigarette businesses and causing financial problems by urging the public to stop using liquid e-cigarettes in a press release dated February 23, 2019. KECA claimed that the basis for MOHW's decision was a notice from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prohibiting the sale of liquid e-cigarettes due to the use of tetrahydrocannabinol, a main culprit in the US outbreak of severe lung illness associated with vaping that claimed eight lives and resulted in a ban on vaping products by the FDA in 2019. The South Korean Health Ministry, however, confirmed only one suspected case of lung injury related to e-cigarettes at the time of the press release and said that even that case was suspected to be from a smoker. According to a study published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science in December 2021, there have been no cases of severe pneumonia or lung injuries among users of liquid e-cigarettes. Despite these findings, KECA criticized the Health Ministry for not withdrawing its strong recommendation to suspend the use of liquid e-cigarettes and accused them of neglecting their duty. KECA also took issue with a press release issued by the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) on July 21, titled "Liquid E-cigarettes Disperse More and Farther Fine Dust than Cigarettes," saying that the measurements of fine dust by the KDCA were unavoidably higher in areas of higher humidity due to the method used in measuring them. KECA further argued that the comparison of liquid e-cigarettes and tobacco in the same environment is an inappropriate research method that fails to consider the unique characteristics of liquid e-cigarettes. KECA maintained that the government has already acknowledged that e-cigarettes are safer than tobacco, citing a 2017 test by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) that found harmful substances in liquid e-cigarettes to be much lower than those in tobacco. KECA also pointed out that no tar or carbon monoxide was detected in liquid e-cigarettes, and the levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were 1/20th and 1/500th those in cigarettes, respectively. Despite the significant differences in harmful substance contents, KECA protested that the Health Ministry's anti-smoking campaign has created a false perception that liquid e-cigarettes are as harmful as tobacco, causing great economic and psychological harm to e-cigarette business owners. KECA's Vice President Kim Du-hwan stated that KECA would do its utmost to win a legal battle against the government by preparing all scientific evidence and logical arguments to address the unfair treatment of small e-cigarette business owners who are unable to voice their concerns. A spokesperson for the Health Ministry responded to the lawsuit by stating that the relevant authorities would thoroughly examine the details of the complaint and work with other agencies such as KDCA and MFDS to address the issues.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only for industry-related communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, this article may not accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original version for precise information.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government in its positions and statements regarding domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues.


The ownership of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there are any copyright infringements, please contact us for removal.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
Law360 reports that a Fifth Circuit panel expressed skepticism about the FDA’s claim that it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarette products, noting that only six applications had been approved out of hundreds of thousands and that near-100% denials look like a ban.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
According to Law360, VPR Brands and iMiracle have filed a joint notice in federal court in Florida stating that they have signed a settlement term sheet and plan to finalize a global settlement within 30 days that would resolve multiple lawsuits. The dispute, which began in 2022 and centers on the “Elf” trademark, has involved injunctions, counterclaims and a key ruling by the Federal Circuit overturning a lower court’s order.
Dec.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report | Belarus to centralize vaping market under state supervision
Special Report | Belarus to centralize vaping market under state supervision
Belarus is preparing to overhaul its vaping market under tight state control — from monopolizing imports to banning online sales and restricting retail licenses. Officials say nearly 77% of the disposable e-cigarette market is supplied illegally, prompting sweeping regulatory measures that have already sparked strong pushback from consumers and vape retailers.
Dec.03
France’s Top Administrative Court Suspends Nicotine Pouch Decree
France’s Top Administrative Court Suspends Nicotine Pouch Decree
France’s Council of State has suspended a government decree that was set to ban the manufacture, production and export of nicotine pouches from April 2026. The court ruled that companies were not given sufficient time to reorganise their operations. A final decision on the legality of the decree is expected by June 2026. The court noted that the commercial sale of nicotine pouches is already restricted under existing public health laws.
Dec.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
China Further Tightens E-Cigarette Capacity and Investment Controls, Supply Chain Faces Stronger Regulation and Accelerated Shakeout
China Further Tightens E-Cigarette Capacity and Investment Controls, Supply Chain Faces Stronger Regulation and Accelerated Shakeout
China is tightening controls over e-cigarette production capacity and investment as regulators move to curb disorderly competition and address oversupply risks, a new policy framework released on December 25 shows, signaling stronger oversight and a faster shakeout across the country’s e-cigarette supply chain, according to first-hand reporting by 2Firsts.
Dec.25
Former Malaysian Health Minister Allegedly Rejected RM50 Million Bribe Over GEG
Former Malaysian Health Minister Allegedly Rejected RM50 Million Bribe Over GEG
A former political aide has alleged that a RM50 million bribe was offered to Malaysia’s then health minister to abandon the tobacco generational end game (GEG) policy. The claim was published in an opinion article and on social media. No report was made to anti-corruption authorities. Despite the alleged rejection, the GEG provision was later removed from the tobacco bill tabled in Parliament in 2023.
Dec.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai