South Korean E-cigarette Association sues government for economic damages.

Oct.17.2022
South Korean E-cigarette Association sues government for economic damages.
South Korea's electronic cigarette association has sued the government for causing economic losses to small e-cigarette businesses with incorrect information.

The Korean e-cigarette association has filed a lawsuit against the government, accusing it of causing economic losses to small business owners involved in the e-cigarette industry by providing incorrect information.


The Korea E-cigarette Association (KECA) has accused the government's health agency, the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW), of damaging the reputation of small e-cigarette businesses and causing financial problems by urging the public to stop using liquid e-cigarettes in a press release dated February 23, 2019. KECA claimed that the basis for MOHW's decision was a notice from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prohibiting the sale of liquid e-cigarettes due to the use of tetrahydrocannabinol, a main culprit in the US outbreak of severe lung illness associated with vaping that claimed eight lives and resulted in a ban on vaping products by the FDA in 2019. The South Korean Health Ministry, however, confirmed only one suspected case of lung injury related to e-cigarettes at the time of the press release and said that even that case was suspected to be from a smoker. According to a study published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science in December 2021, there have been no cases of severe pneumonia or lung injuries among users of liquid e-cigarettes. Despite these findings, KECA criticized the Health Ministry for not withdrawing its strong recommendation to suspend the use of liquid e-cigarettes and accused them of neglecting their duty. KECA also took issue with a press release issued by the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) on July 21, titled "Liquid E-cigarettes Disperse More and Farther Fine Dust than Cigarettes," saying that the measurements of fine dust by the KDCA were unavoidably higher in areas of higher humidity due to the method used in measuring them. KECA further argued that the comparison of liquid e-cigarettes and tobacco in the same environment is an inappropriate research method that fails to consider the unique characteristics of liquid e-cigarettes. KECA maintained that the government has already acknowledged that e-cigarettes are safer than tobacco, citing a 2017 test by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) that found harmful substances in liquid e-cigarettes to be much lower than those in tobacco. KECA also pointed out that no tar or carbon monoxide was detected in liquid e-cigarettes, and the levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were 1/20th and 1/500th those in cigarettes, respectively. Despite the significant differences in harmful substance contents, KECA protested that the Health Ministry's anti-smoking campaign has created a false perception that liquid e-cigarettes are as harmful as tobacco, causing great economic and psychological harm to e-cigarette business owners. KECA's Vice President Kim Du-hwan stated that KECA would do its utmost to win a legal battle against the government by preparing all scientific evidence and logical arguments to address the unfair treatment of small e-cigarette business owners who are unable to voice their concerns. A spokesperson for the Health Ministry responded to the lawsuit by stating that the relevant authorities would thoroughly examine the details of the complaint and work with other agencies such as KDCA and MFDS to address the issues.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only for industry-related communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, this article may not accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original version for precise information.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government in its positions and statements regarding domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues.


The ownership of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there are any copyright infringements, please contact us for removal.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Virginia Attorney General Backs Vape Enforcement Act Limiting Sales to FDA-Authorized or Pending Products
Virginia Attorney General Backs Vape Enforcement Act Limiting Sales to FDA-Authorized or Pending Products
Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones is backing new vape enforcement legislation that he said would do more than warn people about the dangers of vaping. The proposal would tighten rules on which products can be sold and increase enforcement aimed at keeping vapes out of the hands of young people.
Mar.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report | Breeze and Glas Seek White House Review as FDA Advances Flavored ENDS Guidance
Special Report | Breeze and Glas Seek White House Review as FDA Advances Flavored ENDS Guidance
Breeze Smoke and Glas, Inc. have separately requested White House review under Executive Order 12866 as the FDA advances draft guidance on flavored ENDS (RIN 0910-ZC78). The guidance aims to clarify evidentiary standards under the statutory “appropriate for the protection of public health” (APPH) framework. The parallel filings highlight industry concern over regulatory predictability, particularly as Glas’s PMTA review status has recently drawn market attention.
Special Report
Mar.03
UK OPSS launches vape safety campaign focusing on use, charging and disposal
UK OPSS launches vape safety campaign focusing on use, charging and disposal
The UK Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) published information on March 4, 2026, launching a new campaign to raise awareness among young people about safety issues linked to using, charging and disposing of vapes.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Pennsylvania to Publish Vape Manufacturer Directory by June 20
Pennsylvania to Publish Vape Manufacturer Directory by June 20
Now that Act 57 of 2025 is in effect, every manufacturer of nicotine-containing electronic cigarettes sold or offered for retail sale in Pennsylvania must be certified by the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General.
Apr.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMI Sells Stake in Swedish Match Brazil Business, Including Fiat Lux Brand
PMI Sells Stake in Swedish Match Brazil Business, Including Fiat Lux Brand
Philip Morris International said it is selling its stake in Swedish Match do Brasil, which controls the Brazilian household goods brand Fiat Lux. The buyer is Ignis FIP, a Brazilian private investment vehicle backed by businessman Marcos Fernando Garms. The transaction also includes Swedish Match da Amazônia, but the value of the deal was not disclosed. PMI said the sale is aligned with its vision of a smoke-free future.
Mar.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Poland to Discuss Revised E-Cigarette Definitions With Focus on Induction Technology
Poland to Discuss Revised E-Cigarette Definitions With Focus on Induction Technology
According to the agenda published by Poland’s Council of Ministers on Monday, the government is set to consider a draft amendment to the Excise Tax Act on Tuesday.
Apr.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai