South Korean E-cigarette Association sues government for economic damages.

Oct.17.2022
South Korean E-cigarette Association sues government for economic damages.
South Korea's electronic cigarette association has sued the government for causing economic losses to small e-cigarette businesses with incorrect information.

The Korean e-cigarette association has filed a lawsuit against the government, accusing it of causing economic losses to small business owners involved in the e-cigarette industry by providing incorrect information.


The Korea E-cigarette Association (KECA) has accused the government's health agency, the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW), of damaging the reputation of small e-cigarette businesses and causing financial problems by urging the public to stop using liquid e-cigarettes in a press release dated February 23, 2019. KECA claimed that the basis for MOHW's decision was a notice from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prohibiting the sale of liquid e-cigarettes due to the use of tetrahydrocannabinol, a main culprit in the US outbreak of severe lung illness associated with vaping that claimed eight lives and resulted in a ban on vaping products by the FDA in 2019. The South Korean Health Ministry, however, confirmed only one suspected case of lung injury related to e-cigarettes at the time of the press release and said that even that case was suspected to be from a smoker. According to a study published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science in December 2021, there have been no cases of severe pneumonia or lung injuries among users of liquid e-cigarettes. Despite these findings, KECA criticized the Health Ministry for not withdrawing its strong recommendation to suspend the use of liquid e-cigarettes and accused them of neglecting their duty. KECA also took issue with a press release issued by the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) on July 21, titled "Liquid E-cigarettes Disperse More and Farther Fine Dust than Cigarettes," saying that the measurements of fine dust by the KDCA were unavoidably higher in areas of higher humidity due to the method used in measuring them. KECA further argued that the comparison of liquid e-cigarettes and tobacco in the same environment is an inappropriate research method that fails to consider the unique characteristics of liquid e-cigarettes. KECA maintained that the government has already acknowledged that e-cigarettes are safer than tobacco, citing a 2017 test by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) that found harmful substances in liquid e-cigarettes to be much lower than those in tobacco. KECA also pointed out that no tar or carbon monoxide was detected in liquid e-cigarettes, and the levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were 1/20th and 1/500th those in cigarettes, respectively. Despite the significant differences in harmful substance contents, KECA protested that the Health Ministry's anti-smoking campaign has created a false perception that liquid e-cigarettes are as harmful as tobacco, causing great economic and psychological harm to e-cigarette business owners. KECA's Vice President Kim Du-hwan stated that KECA would do its utmost to win a legal battle against the government by preparing all scientific evidence and logical arguments to address the unfair treatment of small e-cigarette business owners who are unable to voice their concerns. A spokesperson for the Health Ministry responded to the lawsuit by stating that the relevant authorities would thoroughly examine the details of the complaint and work with other agencies such as KDCA and MFDS to address the issues.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only for industry-related communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, this article may not accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original version for precise information.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government in its positions and statements regarding domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues.


The ownership of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there are any copyright infringements, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As regulators pay closer attention to child safety in nicotine pouches, manufacturers face a practical challenge: how to strengthen child-resistant packaging without unnecessarily reworking products, production lines and regulatory submissions already in place. In a written interview with 2Firsts, Chemular detailed Safeguard’s external packaging approach, its customer-specific testing requirements and possible PMTA pathways. The model remains early-stage, but it offers a new way to think about an increasingly important regulatory and manufacturing issue.
Industry Insight
Sep.19
German Customs Seize 115,800 Vapes in €1.4 Million Tax Case
German Customs Seize 115,800 Vapes in €1.4 Million Tax Case
Germany's Magdeburg Main Customs Office seized 115,800 untaxed e-cigarettes containing a combined 4.366 million mL of e-liquid during four truck inspections between August 10 and September 4, 2026. The seizures prevented an estimated €1.397 million in tax losses and set a record for the customs office's jurisdiction. Criminal proceedings have been initiated against four truck drivers. The case follows a separate German investigation involving more than 7.6 million illicit vapes and an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses.
Enforcement
Oct.13
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
Ahead of the 2026 NACS Show, 2Firsts interviewed Chris Rapanick, NACS managing director of research, on changes reshaping the U.S. convenience-store tobacco and nicotine market. NACS data show cigarette sales declining while smokeless alternatives, including nicotine pouches, continue to grow. The interview also examines higher OTP margins, shifting backbar space, weaker store traffic, regulatory uncertainty and NACS’ outlook for 2027, offering a retailer-side view of one of the world’s largest nicotine markets.
Interview
Oct.03
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
American Vapor Manufacturers (AVM) and Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY filed separate motions on October 7, 2026, seeking to intervene on the FDA's side in a lawsuit challenging its enforcement guidance for certain e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with pending premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). Seven public health and tobacco-control organizations, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, sued the agency in July to overturn the policy. AVM argues that vacating the guidance could disrupt orders, inventory, retail distribution and investments in regulatory submissions.
Regulations
Oct.09