South Korean E-cigarette Association sues government for economic damages.

Oct.17.2022
South Korean E-cigarette Association sues government for economic damages.
South Korea's electronic cigarette association has sued the government for causing economic losses to small e-cigarette businesses with incorrect information.

The Korean e-cigarette association has filed a lawsuit against the government, accusing it of causing economic losses to small business owners involved in the e-cigarette industry by providing incorrect information.


The Korea E-cigarette Association (KECA) has accused the government's health agency, the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW), of damaging the reputation of small e-cigarette businesses and causing financial problems by urging the public to stop using liquid e-cigarettes in a press release dated February 23, 2019. KECA claimed that the basis for MOHW's decision was a notice from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prohibiting the sale of liquid e-cigarettes due to the use of tetrahydrocannabinol, a main culprit in the US outbreak of severe lung illness associated with vaping that claimed eight lives and resulted in a ban on vaping products by the FDA in 2019. The South Korean Health Ministry, however, confirmed only one suspected case of lung injury related to e-cigarettes at the time of the press release and said that even that case was suspected to be from a smoker. According to a study published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science in December 2021, there have been no cases of severe pneumonia or lung injuries among users of liquid e-cigarettes. Despite these findings, KECA criticized the Health Ministry for not withdrawing its strong recommendation to suspend the use of liquid e-cigarettes and accused them of neglecting their duty. KECA also took issue with a press release issued by the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) on July 21, titled "Liquid E-cigarettes Disperse More and Farther Fine Dust than Cigarettes," saying that the measurements of fine dust by the KDCA were unavoidably higher in areas of higher humidity due to the method used in measuring them. KECA further argued that the comparison of liquid e-cigarettes and tobacco in the same environment is an inappropriate research method that fails to consider the unique characteristics of liquid e-cigarettes. KECA maintained that the government has already acknowledged that e-cigarettes are safer than tobacco, citing a 2017 test by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) that found harmful substances in liquid e-cigarettes to be much lower than those in tobacco. KECA also pointed out that no tar or carbon monoxide was detected in liquid e-cigarettes, and the levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were 1/20th and 1/500th those in cigarettes, respectively. Despite the significant differences in harmful substance contents, KECA protested that the Health Ministry's anti-smoking campaign has created a false perception that liquid e-cigarettes are as harmful as tobacco, causing great economic and psychological harm to e-cigarette business owners. KECA's Vice President Kim Du-hwan stated that KECA would do its utmost to win a legal battle against the government by preparing all scientific evidence and logical arguments to address the unfair treatment of small e-cigarette business owners who are unable to voice their concerns. A spokesperson for the Health Ministry responded to the lawsuit by stating that the relevant authorities would thoroughly examine the details of the complaint and work with other agencies such as KDCA and MFDS to address the issues.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only for industry-related communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, this article may not accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original version for precise information.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government in its positions and statements regarding domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues.


The ownership of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there are any copyright infringements, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Namibia Moves to Tighten Laws on E-Cigarettes and Emerging Nicotine Products
Namibia Moves to Tighten Laws on E-Cigarettes and Emerging Nicotine Products
Namibia is moving to tighten regulation of e-cigarettes and other emerging nicotine products as part of broader tobacco control efforts. Deputy health minister Susan Ndjaleka said the government is reviewing the Tobacco Products Control Act to close regulatory gaps and address emerging tobacco products. Namibia is also working toward joining the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products in order to curb the black market and protect public revenue.
Apr.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Alberta Seeks to Add New Vape Restrictions on Top of Existing Tobacco Framework
Alberta Seeks to Add New Vape Restrictions on Top of Existing Tobacco Framework
A new Alberta bill aimed at reducing vaping rates, especially among young people, is moving into the legislative process. Bill 208, the Vaping Reduction Act, was introduced by United Conservative Party MLA Chelsae Petrovic and appears to build on the province’s existing Tobacco, Smoking and Vaping Reduction Act. Early reporting suggests the bill could focus on disposable vapes and impose further limits on youth access to vaping products.
Apr.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jeju Health Center to Apply Conventional Tobacco Rules to Liquid E-Cigarettes From April 24
Jeju Health Center to Apply Conventional Tobacco Rules to Liquid E-Cigarettes From April 24
Jeju Health Center said it will apply the same regulations used for conventional tobacco products to all tobacco products, including liquid e-cigarettes, from April 24, while also strengthening public guidance and smoke-free zone management.
Apr.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris Says Its Smoke-Free Transition in Spain Now Has Economic Impact Above EUR 3.3 Billion
Philip Morris Says Its Smoke-Free Transition in Spain Now Has Economic Impact Above EUR 3.3 Billion
Philip Morris said it is accelerating its transition toward smoke-free products in Spain and claimed that the related economic impact now exceeds EUR 3.3 billion. Philip Morris also said that more than 90% of nicotine consumption in Spain still comes from conventional cigarettes, leaving room for growth in smoke-free categories, while regulation and taxation remain major obstacles in its view.
Apr.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korea Set to Enforce Liquid Vape Ban in Smoke-Free Areas, but Welfare Ministry Abruptly Adds Two-Month Guidance Period
South Korea Set to Enforce Liquid Vape Ban in Smoke-Free Areas, but Welfare Ministry Abruptly Adds Two-Month Guidance Period
Local governments across South Korea recently issued press releases saying they would intensively crack down on the use of liquid e-cigarettes in smoke-free areas. Since the revised Tobacco Business Act, passed in December last year, included liquid e-cigarettes within the definition of tobacco and took effect on April 24, local authorities had prepared to begin enforcement immediately.
Apr.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report | China’s Tobacco Tax Debate Shifts Toward Tax Design as Policy Trade-offs Come Into Focus
Special Report | China’s Tobacco Tax Debate Shifts Toward Tax Design as Policy Trade-offs Come Into Focus
China’s tobacco tax debate is moving from whether to raise prices to how the tax system should be designed. At a Beijing forum on World No Tobacco Day, experts discussed higher specific excise taxes, minimum tax burdens and dynamic adjustments linked to income and inflation. The issue also connects to China’s broader consumption tax reform, health financing and chronic disease costs. Public reports did not mention e-cigarettes, heated tobacco, nicotine pouches or other new nicotine products.
Jun.11