Study Links E-Cigarette Bans to Increased Cigarette Sales

Apr.08.2022
Study Links E-Cigarette Bans to Increased Cigarette Sales
A new study suggests that state-level e-cigarette bans are associated with increased cigarette sales.

According to foreign media reports, a new study suggests that a national ban on e-cigarettes is linked to an increase in cigarette sales. The study, published in the scientific journal "Health Affairs," adds to mounting evidence that banning the sale of e-cigarettes may lead more people to revert back to smoking, which is less safe than using nicotine alternatives.

 

During a three-month study, it was found that an additional 3.4 million cigarette packs were sold through convenience stores across three states.

 

Researchers have used state-level cigarette sales data to discover that Massachusetts, which has implemented a complete ban on nicotine e-cigarettes, has seen a 7.5% increase in per capita cigarette sales compared to expectations. Rhode Island and Washington, which have enacted bans on non-tobacco flavored nicotine e-cigarettes, have an average estimated increase of 4.6% in per capita cigarette sales compared to expectations. Based on actual and estimated cigarette sales, the researchers suggest that an additional 3.4 million cigarette packs were sold in convenience stores across the three states during the three-month study period following the implementation of their respective bans.

 

The study was sponsored by Juul Labs, but has had little impact thus far, possibly due to the belief among many in the tobacco control field that research funded by the industry is biased. This debate may stem from decades of data suppression by big tobacco companies, which has recently resurfaced. For example, the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT) now explicitly prohibits industry-sponsored speakers from presenting at its conferences, a move that has led to resignations and condemnation of current tobacco control as "anti-scientific".

 

Researchers examined data from the fall of 2019, when legislators began paying attention to a series of mysterious lung diseases referred to as EVALI, which were quickly associated with e-cigarettes by politicians. Although by November 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had attributed most cases to contaminated illegal THC cartridges, state governments still stirred up panic and sought emergency bans, which in some cases became permanent.

 

In response to the EVALI outbreak, Massachusetts instituted an emergency ban on all nicotine e-cigarettes starting on September 24, 2019. Rhode Island and Washington followed suit, implementing four-month emergency bans on non-tobacco flavored nicotine e-cigarettes on October 4, 2019, and October 10, 2019, respectively. Massachusetts has since permanently banned the sale of flavored e-cigarette products, including menthol, while Rhode Island and Washington's emergency bans have expired, though a permanent flavor ban remains on the table.

 

Previous research has found similar results to those presented in health value papers.

 

The use of nicotine has not been linked to any diagnosis of EVALI in the field of medicine, but misinformation continues to spread. Under the guidance of sensationalist reporting by policymakers and the media, concerns over the rates of youth vaping have directly sparked fears over deadly vaping products. Misleading information is simple: youth are using e-cigarettes and, in some cases, dying from them. Over two years have passed since the outbreak, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the US have yet to release any formal correction stating that nicotine e-cigarettes are not associated with lung injuries.

 

Previous research has yielded similar results to the findings of a health-focused paper. Co-authors from Boston University published an article in the Harm Reduction Journal indicating that misunderstandings surrounding EVALI (e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury) – which led to a ban in Massachusetts – appeared to have increased cigarette consumption across Boston. Moreover, Dr. Abigail Friedman from Yale University found in JAMA Pediatrics that after San Francisco banned flavored e-cigarettes and tobacco products, high schoolers in the city were more likely to smoke than their peers in other similar districts across the US.

 

(Source: Filter)

 

Restrictions on vaping products may have unintended consequences, including an increase in cigarette sales. While policymakers have focused on limiting access to e-cigarettes, they may inadvertently be pushing consumers back to traditional tobacco products. This is especially problematic given the well-documented health risks associated with smoking. It remains to be seen whether tighter regulations on vaping will have the intended impact of reducing nicotine addiction overall.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
The FDA has authorized four additional on! nicotine pouches, bringing the U.S. total to 30. The decision marks another outcome of the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot, whose communication and review practices are now being applied more broadly across the category. It also extends Helix’s authorized portfolio from on! PLUS to the earlier on! line. Yet all FDA-authorized nicotine pouches still come from subsidiaries of PMI or Altria, underscoring how concentrated U.S. regulatory access remains.
Aug.05
Product | JTI Philippines Expands Nordic Spirit Nicotine Pouch Portfolio With Dark Pop and Red Frost
Product | JTI Philippines Expands Nordic Spirit Nicotine Pouch Portfolio With Dark Pop and Red Frost
JTI Philippines has expanded the Nordic Spirit nicotine pouch portfolio in the Philippines with two new variants, Dark Pop and Red Frost. Both products maintain the brand’s tobacco-free nicotine pouch positioning, with Dark Pop featuring a fizzy cola profile with citrus and sweet notes, while Red Frost combines cool mint with sweet red berry flavors. The two variants are now available through Philippine online retail channels.
Aug.18
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Holdings said in its latest shareholder letter that it is moving to commercialize PACHA products and monetize its PMTA assets as the FDA changes enforcement priorities for unauthorized ENDS products. Thirty PACHA SKUs were previously tentatively identified for a proposed public list of products that the FDA generally does not intend to prioritize for enforcement. Charlie’s is also preparing test-market sales of age-gated flavored disposables and says it currently holds 678 PMTA-related product assets while seeking additional strategic transactions and partnerships.
Sep.11
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
HM Revenue & Customs is urging members of the public to report vape shops, barber shops and other high-street businesses suspected of tax fraud, money laundering or other illegal activity, with informants not required to provide personal details. HMRC plans more than 30,000 interventions in 2026-27 targeting tax fraud, organised crime and illicit activity, including the sale of illegal vapes and tobacco. The push forms part of a broader UK effort to tackle organised crime on high streets, backed by a £30 million government enforcement programme.
Regulations
Aug.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06