According to Taipei Times reported on August 21, the Tobacco Control Alliance is urging Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare not to hinder the proposed flavor ban and not to delay the implementation of the policy.
The alliance is asking the Department of Health and Welfare whether they oppose the resolution by lawmakers to completely ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.
On August 9th, the department released a recommendation to prohibit the use of 27 chemicals in cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and HNB tobacco products.
Wang Han-yang, Chairman of the National Alliance for Basic Education Action, stated that additives in flavored cigarettes reduce the harsh smell of smoke, which attracts young people and women to smoke.
He stated that according to Article 10 of the Tobacco Hazard Prevention Act, prohibited additives cannot be used in tobacco products, and lawmakers have agreed to completely ban the sale of all flavored tobacco products.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare recommended in March of last year to only ban four flavors: flower, fruit, chocolate, and mint. However, this suggestion was questioned because it did not cover the ten most common flavors.
However, after 16 months of delay, the department only proposed banning 27 additives, instead of all flavor additives, citing that this aligns with practices in the United States and the European Union.
Last Friday, the alliance submitted a petition signed by 173 civil society groups to representatives of the ruling party and opposition parties in Taiwan.
In the letter, it was asked:
Is the Department of Health and Welfare trying to veto the legislative proposal to ban the sale of flavored tobacco by only prohibiting 27 additives?
The letter also raised doubts about...
When most similar regulations in the United States and 27 countries of the European Union are aimed at tobacco flavors, does the statement of the Ministry of Health and Welfare hold up? Especially when the EU has already completely banned all flavored tobaccos that mask the taste of tobacco.
The group stated that the ban on flavored tobacco products should align with President William Lai's "Healthy China Taiwan" plan.
They asked,
Why is the Ministry of Health and Welfare only banning 27 additives, despite industry reports showing over 1200 different flavor additives? Will the Ministry of Health and Welfare also be able to ban concept flavors invented by tobacco companies by simply banning additives – such as "Arctic Chill" and "Tropical Breeze"?
The alliance points out that the FDA has staff responsible for inspecting and fining for "abnormal odors or flavors" in food, but the Health Promotion Bureau states that it cannot regulate the taste of tobacco products solely based on odor.
Why is the Ministry of Health's attitude towards tobacco companies so divergent?
Notice
1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.
2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.
Copyright
This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.
This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.
